Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
pull_requests: -26023
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue4476>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
sorry about the noise, everyone. Missed an '6' in the end of the issue name
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +fbidu
nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0
pull_requests: +26026
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/27509
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
nosy: +fbidu
nosy_count: 5.0 -> 6.0
pull_requests: +26023
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/27509
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/iss
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
nosy: +fbidu
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44539>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
Hi all!
I'm seeing the same error that @pablogsal saw here, but I'm on Linux Mint 20.1
x86_64 (Kernel 5.4.0-77):
./python -m test test_os -R : -v
== CPython 3.11.0a0 (heads/pr_26964:d375c08c75, Jul 3 2021, 07:47:01) [GCC
9.3.0]
== Linux-5.4.0-
Felipe added the comment:
All yours! I'm tied up so won't be able to submit the PR
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 10:12, Stéphane Blondon
wrote:
>
> Stéphane Blondon added the comment:
>
> I add the same idea but later than you, so I'm interested by such feature.
>
New submission from Felipe Faria :
Consider the following:
```
import asyncio
import time
async def async_test():
while True:
await asyncio.sleep(1)
print("in here - async")
def sync_test():
while True:
time.sleep(1)
print("in here - sy
Felipe added the comment:
Here is an implementation of the safe repr for numbers if helpful:
```
def safe_repr_int(object):
sign = ''
if object < 0:
sign = '-'
object = -object
r = repr(object)
if len(r) <= 4:
return
New submission from Felipe :
It would be nice if pprint learned to insert underscores in long numbers
Current behavior:
>>> pprint.pprint(int(1e9))
10
Desired behavior
>>> pprint.pprint(int(1e9))
1_000_000_000
Wikipedia tells me that "groups of 3" is t
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
nosy: +fbidu
nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0
pull_requests: +21848
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22737
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
nosy: +fbidu
nosy_count: 5.0 -> 6.0
pull_requests: +21847
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22737
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +21701
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22738
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Felipe Rodrigues :
Hello all,
While testing some static analysis tools on HTTP/client.py, Pylint pointed
me to HTTPResponse.geturl() method with a "no-member" error for the `url`
attribute. I tried invoking the `geturl` method and reading the
`HTTPResponse.url`
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +21700
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22737
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Felipe Rodrigues :
Hi all!
I was testing some static analysis tool and decided to use the HTTP module as
testing ground. While running `bandit` at the client module, it detected 3
instances of using `assert` inside the code. Twice in the HTTPResponse class
and once in
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
@_savage, on the commit @xtreak referred, there's a note that "image/jpg" and
some other non-standard mimetypes are only supported if `strict=False`[1]
So, this:
>>> mimetypes.guess_extension("image/jpg"
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
Correction: (...) on the _caller_ to solve the hashing* issue (...)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
Hello all,
I love discussions about caching! While I do see the point of Itayazolay's
proposal, I think that it should be on the _caller_ to solve the caching issue,
and not on the _callee_ to provide a way to make it happen.
That is, I think that i
Change by Felipe A. Hernandez :
--
components: +Library (Lib)
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Felipe A. Hernandez added the comment:
import traceback
import multiprocessing.managers
class MyManager(multiprocessing.managers.SyncManager):
pass
class DictList(multiprocessing.managers.BaseProxy):
_method_to_typeid_ = {'__getitem__': 'dict'}
def _
New submission from Felipe Rodrigues :
Hi,
Can you elaborate on this?
Thanks!
--
nosy: +fbidu
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40042>
___
___
Felipe A. Hernandez added the comment:
After some tests, due the accumulating nature of fwalk, I've just realised it's
not very safe for big directories, so I'll be closing this issue.
Alternatively, using py37+ fd based scandir, and dir_fd unlink and rmdir calls
would re
New submission from Felipe A. Hernandez :
os.rmtree has fd-based symlink replacement protection when iterating with
scandir (after bpo-28564).
This logic could be greatly simplified simply by os.fwalk in supported
platforms, which already implements a similar (maybe safer) protection
New submission from Felipe :
The hex property of `UUID` is implemented as `'%032x' % self.int`
Is it specified that this will always be lowercase? If so, can we add a note to
the documentation indicating so?
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation, Library (Lib
Change by Felipe Manzano :
--
pull_requests: +11750, 11751
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19953>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by Felipe Manzano :
--
pull_requests: +11750
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19953>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Felipe Manzano :
--
pull_requests: +11750, 11751, 11752
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19953>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Felipe added the comment:
Please go ahead with the PR. I can't push this one through, but would be
great to have this finally land!
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 03:42, Karthikeyan Singaravelan <
rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
>
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
Ezio, I have issued a simple PR that adds just the two aliases cited in the
issue's initial message. I would like to implement tests but as I wrote in the
PR's message, I'm not really sure how to proceed with that. bpo-18624 is really
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
What about adding some more information in the exception message in addition to
the docs? I mean, if we're raising an issue because someone inserted Feb 29, we
add a note about leap year in the exception message
--
nosy: +
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
pull_requests: +9550
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue18624>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +9549
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
pull_requests: +9104
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26005>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +9103
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34576>
___
_
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
For reference in future discussions, Python's base64 module implements RFC 3548
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3548) whose section 2.3
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3548#section-2.3) discusses about
"Interpretation of non-alphabet characters
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
Actually, I'm not even sure if it makes sense to decode the 'first valid
substring'... IMHO, we should warn the user
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.pyt
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
I am not sure if simply ignoring the non-valid character is the best way to go.
Feels like silencing errors.
b64decode does accept the 'validate' flag - defaulted to False - that will halt
the execution and throw an error.
What might be a good
Felipe Rodrigues added the comment:
Well, even if we do fix some security issues in SimpleHTTPServer, it doesn't
change the fact that it shouldn't really be used for sensitive applications. I
like how Django docs handles a similar issue regarding their development serv
Change by Felipe Rodrigues :
--
nosy: +fbidu
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34728>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Felipe Filgueira Barral added the comment:
Tks Ronald, solve the problem! =)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32432>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Change by Felipe Filgueira Barral :
--
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32432>
___
___
Pyth
New submission from Felipe Filgueira Barral :
When i open the IDLE and try include ' or " in any script, the python closes
alone! Does anyone know what might be happening? I use mac, version high
sierra...
Process: Python [1048]
Path: /Applications/Python 3.6/IDLE.app/Contents/Ma
Change by Felipe :
--
nosy: -fov
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25144>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.pyth
Felipe added the comment:
Sure, will do!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31533>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Felipe added the comment:
Woops. Apologies -- I somehow deleted that part from the report. Thanks Antoine
for jumping in. If you are using the wiki url, make sure not to include the
question mark at the end :-)
--
___
Python tracker
<ht
New submission from Felipe:
The link to the `OpenSSL cipher list format` 404s. I don't know if it's where
the original meant to point, but the same information is available at
https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Manual:Ciphers(1)#CIPHER_LIST_FORMAT
--
assignee: docs@python
New submission from Felipe Cruz:
I'm using TimedRotatingFileHandler to rotate a log file *every* minute.
If I stop my program, in the middle of a minute, and start again, the next
rotation will happen at (currentTime + 60). The result of this behavior is that
I'll end up with fil
Felipe Volpone added the comment:
r.david.murray: I liked your way.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25432>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Felipe :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40492/Python 3.5.0
(32-bit)_20150916132422.log
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25144>
___
___
New submission from Felipe:
The 3.5 Windows installer fails with "The TARGETDIR variable must be provided
when invoking this installer"
Here are the steps I followed:
1. Initial screen:
- uncheck the add path and all users options
- select "Customize installation"
Felipe added the comment:
The attached patch implements these changes through _callable instead. This
patch also ensures that the underlying object that staticmethod and classmethod
wrap is a callable object as well.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40470/issue23078.patch
Felipe added the comment:
Not sure it's my place to comment here, but here are my 2 cents: I think
Robert's proposal to have module functions is the only way to have a
user-friendly and robust API, and it solves more than just the assert typo
problem. (And yes, it would require
Felipe added the comment:
Regarding Claudiu's comment about `staticmethod(x)` or `classmethod(x)` not
being callable, would it suffice to add a specific check of the form
`(isinstance(x, (classmethod, staticmethod)) and _callable(x.__func__))`?
Separately, would it be better to includ
Felipe added the comment:
Thanks for the clarification; sorry I misread issue #14718.
I agree with Ethan's point. Though I would say "Yield expressions are allowed
anywhere in try ... except ... finally constructs."
I'd also like to explicitly add a point about th
New submission from Felipe:
This bug report is the opposite of issue #14718. The interpreter did not raise
an error when it encountered a `yield` expression inside the `finally` part of
a `try/finally` statement.
My system's info: Python 3.4.2 (v3.4.2:ab2c023a9432, Oct 6 2014, 22:
Felipe Sateler added the comment:
I'm sorry but I definitely don't have time or knowledge about python
to propose a patch (simply removing pyconfig.h clearly doesn't work).
As to the question, please clarify. I have a python module, which
includes Python.h, which includes pyco
New submission from Felipe Sateler:
I reported the following in the debian bug tracker[1], and it was requested
that I report it here.
pyconfig.h has definitions like the following:
#define HAVE_DIRENT_H 1
#define HAVE_DLFCN_H 1
These are the general form feature test macros take in
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Looks good.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16105>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Looks like PyErr_WriteUnraisable can be a better choice. Exceptions at random
execution points looks a little bit dirty at least for this case.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Hi.. 2 comments related to Kqueue/OSX(16.8)
1 - In tulip/selectors.py L311 and L314 - is key.fd not fd
2 - In EventLoopTestsMixin::test_writer_callback if the writer socket isn't
non-blocking, the test hangs forever..
3 - Errors:
ERROR: testCreateSslTran
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Hi Antonie,
What you said also makes sense to me.
There is one problem(?) that _map_events() is called for every event(for Poll
and EPoll) and this can make things slower (I didn't tested it). Also, does it
needs to be thread
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
I think you have a point. Did you know about the tulip project?
http://code.google.com/p/tulip/source/browse/tulip/unix_events.py#76
It has a PollsterBase class and a SelectPollster(PollsterBase) so the idea is
to have a Poller(and you call poll()) but select
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Without debug backtrace
#0 sem_post () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sem_post.S:34
#1 0x004d456e in PyGILState_Release ()
#2 0x759b9cdc in notify_func_wrapper (arg=0x78c0) at
../sysdeps/pthread/aio_notify.c:45
#3
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Yes! 2.7.3 build with pydebug.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16565>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Running test_aio_read
[New Thread 0x77ff7700 (LWP 20681)]
[New Thread 0x761ff700 (LWP 20682)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x761ff700 (LWP 20682)]
sem_post () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Just confirmed that signals is not a viable option. Is too slow, as Antonie
already pointed. It's almost 5 times slower than with SIGEV_THREAD.
The problem now is:
If I use Py_AddPendingCall, the tests can hang sometimes. I can still follow
Amaury sugge
New submission from Felipe Cruz:
Current pending calls limit is too small and it can be easily reached in very
intensive async file io applications.
There is a little hack in pyaio[1] which sleeps if Py_AddPendingCall returns <
0 but It's not totally clear to me why the size of pendi
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
I've followed latest suggestions.
Test and code updated.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27598/issue16105_v4.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
This patch retries write() until success if errno == EINTR.
There is also a test.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27428/issue16105_v3.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
> Raising an error in case the signal can't be written to the FD
> (because the other end didn't drain the pipe/socket) seems reasonable.
> You should just retry on EINTR (although any sane implementation
> shouldn't return EINTR on
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
> Why limit to EBADF? You could also have EPIPE, EINVAL and many other errors.
> The only error you may not want to report is EAGAIN.
Charles,
You're right! If all errno cases get covered in the patch, will It looks
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Hello,
since Antonie mentioned Py_AddPendingCall I came up with a patch describing
what he proposed.
Let me know if this patch can be improved or discarded(if the problem requires
a more sophisticated solution). In case of improvement I can also submit
another
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Should I send patches for 3.2 and 2.7?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15897>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
I would not say that is a bug, but there is a write(wakeup_fd) call with
ignored return code and maybe this can be improved to an output to stderr, or
maybe a better solution.
--
___
Python tracker
<h
New submission from Felipe Cruz:
It's possible to set a read only FD to signal.set_wakeup_fd(fd)
Since write call[1] inside 'trip_signal' return code is ignored, no error will
be raised.
An untested solution is to call fcntl in this FD to check presence of write
f
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Hello!
Just sent the Contributor Agreement Form.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15897>
___
___
Python-bug
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Updated based on Pitrou comments
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27220/issue15744_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Add tests for {RawIO,BufferedIO,TextIO}.writelines()
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +felipecruz
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27200/issue15744_v1.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
I can submit patches..
Is there any problem to send 1 patch per module?
--
nosy: +felipecruz
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
v4 - inline fseek return code check - as Christian suggested
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27195/issue15897_v4.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
I've updated the patch changing fseek_error goto block error return from
PyErr_SetFromErrno to PyErr_Format(ZipImportError, "can't read Zip file: %R",
archive); (returning NULL after).
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27194
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Patch updated - fseek errors messges will be "can't read Zip file' and not
"can't Open Zip file"
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27192/issue15897_v1.patch
___
Python tr
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Hello!
This is one of my first patches.
Tests still OK! Let me know what you think!
Thanks!
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +felipecruz
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27191/issue15897_v1.patch
___
Python tracker
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
You're very kind David.
Hope I can contribute with something more relevant next time :)
best regards,
Felipe
2011/7/18 R. David Murray
>
> R. David Murray added the comment:
>
> Thank you both for your work on this. The patch I committed i
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Can anyone take a loot at those patches?
Do they need more tests?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
Changes by Felipe Cruz :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21652/issue7484-27_2.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7484>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
David..
I extracted quoteaddr code to _addrformat and now quoteaddr and _addronly call
_addrformat passing a format (<%s> or %s).
I've also created quoteaddr and _addronly test functions as well modified VRFY
and EXPN tests to make sure they call _a
Changes by Felipe Cruz :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21642/issue7484-27.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7484>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
I've rewrote those patches to 'default' and 2.7
--
nosy: +felipecruz
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21641/issue7484-py3k.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.py
Felipe Portella added the comment:
The same happens in Portuguese version ... the regex fails because ver
returns "Versão" ...
[]'s
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>
> Ezio Melotti added the comment:
>
> Won't that fail with Windows ver
New submission from Felipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
I have a problem with python 2.6, when i try to process strings with
triple-quoted string literal i get an error:
a='a''a' #1 double quoted Ok
a='a''''a' # 2 Ok
a= 'a''&
New submission from Felipe Portella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Using Vista in Portuguese platform.version is returning "32bits"
instead of "6.0.6001". This is because in file platform.py line 379
thee regular expression try to search for the word "Version"
93 matches
Mail list logo
