RE: [PyMOL] set sphere_transparency?

2004-04-13 Thread Warren DeLano
Jason, The problem is that your script is changing the setting for the specific object-state by passing it an explicit object name and state number. cmd.set( "sphere_transparency", str(val), spheres, 0, 1, 1 ) As an important compatibility consideration, I recommend for all API functions that

[PyMOL] set sphere_transparency?

2004-04-13 Thread Jason Vertrees
Hey folks, Is this a bug or my incorrect usage of PyMol? (Using 0.95 on a Dual 64-bit Opteron SuSe 9.0 system.) I used this script (http://vertrees.org/~tree/fade_out.py) to create some images for a my first super-simple movie (http://vertrees.org/~tree/output.mpeg). The image (http://vertree

RE: [PyMOL] picking atoms with latest version (0.95)

2004-04-13 Thread Warren DeLano
Ken's answer covers it...the following just provide a little more in-depth coverage: What has happened is that PyMOL now supports the picking of multiple atoms, so use of the lb and rb selections is less necessary. Picking and selecting are not the same thing in PyMOL. Selections are merely list

RE: [PyMOL] picking atoms with latest version (0.95)

2004-04-13 Thread Lind, Kenneth
The lb and rb selections have changed in version 0.95. Looks like the "new" way to do this is with pk1 and pk2. Use ctrl-middle-click, or double-right-click to pick each atom. The first atom you pick will be pk1, the second will be pk2, etc. (up to pk4). You can then use ctrl-x to get the dis

Re: [PyMOL] picking atoms with latest version (0.95)

2004-04-13 Thread Carina Lobley
Hi, I had that problem this weekend too. I've found that ctrl right click picks one atom and shift right double click picks a second atom. That seems to work for the 'dist' and 'bond' commands anyway! Regards, Carina On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Eksterowicz, John wrote: > > I am using the latest version