Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1-2

2009-05-22 Thread Andi Vajda
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Grant Ingersoll wrote: +1 And here is mine: +1 This vote now has passed and the PyLucene 2.4.1-2 refresher release should be made available shortly. Andi.. On May 16, 2009, at 5:35 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: Since the release of PyLucene 2.4.1-1 last month, some bugs

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1-2

2009-05-22 Thread Grant Ingersoll
+1 On May 16, 2009, at 5:35 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: Since the release of PyLucene 2.4.1-1 last month, some bugs and annoyances were fixed that make it worth doing a refresher release of PyLucene, version 2.4.1-2. Release candidate 1 of PyLucene 2.4.1-2 is available from: http://people.

[VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1-2

2009-05-16 Thread Andi Vajda
Since the release of PyLucene 2.4.1-1 last month, some bugs and annoyances were fixed that make it worth doing a refresher release of PyLucene, version 2.4.1-2. Release candidate 1 of PyLucene 2.4.1-2 is available from: http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/ The list of changes is

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-04-01 Thread Andi Vajda
On Apr 1, 2009, at 13:12, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Hey Andi, I think you now have the necessary votes such that this has passed. Feel free to finish out the release. If you need help on what that is, both the Solr and Lucene wiki's have info on making releases. Yep, I should get to this

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-04-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Hey Andi, I think you now have the necessary votes such that this has passed. Feel free to finish out the release. If you need help on what that is, both the Solr and Lucene wiki's have info on making releases. Cheers, Grant On Mar 26, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: +1 On Ma

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-31 Thread Erik Hatcher
I tried the install (for impatient users, nice!), and got this error on the install of JCC: Installed /Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/JCC-2.2-py2.5-macosx-10.5- i386.egg Processing dependencies for JCC==2.2 Searching for JCC==2.2 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/JCC/ No local packages

Fwd: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-25 Thread Michael McCandless
Ugh, forgot to CC pylucene-dev. Mike -- Forwarded message -- From: Michael McCandless Date: Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:40 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1 To: gene...@lucene.apache.org, Andi Vajda +1 to release RC7. I like your re-org of "For the Impatient/Re

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Chris Hostetter
: This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I : moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn I'm not advocating duplication -- and i agree HTML based docs tend to be

[VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Andi Vajda
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote: I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of the other subprojects do) PyLucene 2.1.4 RC7 received some documentation additions: - a local copy of the PyLucene we

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Michael McCandless
I was afraid you would say that! OK I'll work up a patch ;) Mike Andi Vajda wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: > >> But don't forget the "for the impatient..." instructions ;) > > Oh, I thought you were going to contribute them :) > > Andi.. >

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Andi Vajda
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: But don't forget the "for the impatient..." instructions ;) Oh, I thought you were going to contribute them :) Andi..

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Michael McCandless
But don't forget the "for the impatient..." instructions ;) Mike Andi Vajda wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote: > >> : This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by >> : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I >> : moved

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Andi Vajda
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote: : This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I : moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn I'm not advocating duplication

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Andi Vajda
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote: : This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I : moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn I'm not advocating duplication

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Andi Vajda
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote: My one comment is regarding the documentation: the README and INSTALL files included in the release... ./README ./INSTALL ./jcc/README ./jcc/INSTALL ...are all simple one line files pointing people to URLs for HTML based documentation on the website

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I uploaded RC6 with these fixes to the staging area: : http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/ : : Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.4.1. : Thanks ! +0 I attempted to review the release, but my complete lack of knowledge about python, and my computer's aparent la

Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-23 Thread Andi Vajda
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: I tested what happens when I fail to call initVM, and unfortunately I hit a SEGV (different from previous Bus Error): ... snip ... This is the code: import lucene #lucene.initVM(lucene.CLASSPATH) store = lucene.FSDirectory.getDirectory('/lu

[VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-22 Thread Andi Vajda
Last week's vote failed to get the 3 PMC votes to make an official release. Only one PMC vote was cast, a +1 from Mike McCandless. In the meantime, some bugs were fixed and PyLucene 2.4.1 RC5 was uploaded to the staging area: http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/ Please vote to

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1.y

2009-03-12 Thread Andi Vajda
On Mar 12, 2009, at 16:32, Christian Heimes wrote: Andi Vajda wrote: That's the problem. If I change my env or edit setup.py and config.py exists already because I already did a build, it is not going to be re-generated if I do 'python setup.py install' even though it should since 'install' c

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1.y

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Heimes
Andi Vajda wrote: > That's the problem. If I change my env or edit setup.py and config.py > exists already because I already did a build, it is not going to be > re-generated if I do 'python setup.py install' even though it should > since 'install' calls 'build' (and people expect it to) yet 'build

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Andi Vajda
On Mar 12, 2009, at 13:10, Christian Heimes wrote: Andi Vajda wrote: if not os.path.exists(self.jcc_config_file): create_config = 1 else: create_config = 0 for command in self.distribution.commands: if command.startswith(("build", "bdist")): create_config = 1 break if crea

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Andi Vajda
On Mar 12, 2009, at 13:07, Michael McCandless wrote: Michael McCandless wrote: A OK; this is quite confusing. Everyone seems to find it so. I advise Mac users at PARC to just use the system Python (unless and until they really know what they are doing). I will now do the same

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
Bill Janssen wrote: Michael McCandless wrote: Michael McCandless wrote: A OK; this is quite confusing. Everyone seems to find it so. I advise Mac users at PARC to just use the system Python (unless and until they really know what they are doing). I will now do the same to all M

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Bill Janssen
Michael McCandless wrote: > Michael McCandless wrote: > > >>> A OK; this is quite confusing. > >> > >> Everyone seems to find it so. I advise Mac users at PARC to just use > >> the system Python (unless and until they really know what they are > >> doing). > > > > I will now do the same to

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
jcc/jcc/config.py? Indeed it reflects my addition of -F/System/..., with this: LFLAGS=['-framework', 'JavaVM', '-F/System/Library/Frameworks', '- framework', 'Python'] But, weirdly, I don't then see that in the final linking step when running "make" in the pylucene dir. Here's the

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Heimes
Michael McCandless wrote: > Weird, that was not what I was seeing. > > I think I cd'd to jcc, added -F into setup.py, "rm -r build", python > (coming from the right framework) setup.py build (confirmed -F worked), > sudo python setup.py install, cd .., make clean, make, and I didn't see > the -F f

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
Andi Vajda wrote: On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:40, Michael McCandless > wrote: Andi Vajda wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: Anyway, finally, a little bruised from the whole process, and wondering what other Python things on my Mac may now be broken... I was able to run t

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Heimes
Andi Vajda wrote: >> if not os.path.exists(self.jcc_config_file): >>create_config = 1 >> else: >>create_config = 0 >> >> for command in self.distribution.commands: >>if command.startswith(("build", "bdist")): >>create_config = 1 >>break >> >> if create_config: >>self

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
Michael McCandless wrote: A OK; this is quite confusing. Everyone seems to find it so. I advise Mac users at PARC to just use the system Python (unless and until they really know what they are doing). I will now do the same to all Mac+Python people I know & meet ;) Though... It'd be

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Andi Vajda
On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:40, Michael McCandless wrote: Andi Vajda wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: Anyway, finally, a little bruised from the whole process, and wondering what other Python things on my Mac may now be broken... I was able to run the tests successfull

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
Bill Janssen wrote: Michael McCandless wrote: Bill Janssen wrote: Michael McCandless wrote: But why do I have two separate 2.5 Python installs, compiled w/ different options, in the first place? It's weird and I'd like to fix it, I think (outside of building PyLucene, for my own sanity

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Bill Janssen
Michael McCandless wrote: > Bill Janssen wrote: > > > Michael McCandless wrote: > > > >> But why do I have two separate 2.5 Python installs, compiled w/ > >> different options, in the first place? It's weird and I'd like to > >> fix > >> it, I think (outside of building PyLucene, for my own sa

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
Andi Vajda wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: Anyway, finally, a little bruised from the whole process, and wondering what other Python things on my Mac may now be broken... I was able to run the tests successfully! Do not pollute your env with soft links. Use -F instead

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
Bill Janssen wrote: Michael McCandless wrote: But why do I have two separate 2.5 Python installs, compiled w/ different options, in the first place? It's weird and I'd like to fix it, I think (outside of building PyLucene, for my own sanity). One (the one in /Library) is the Python.org

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Bill Janssen
Michael McCandless wrote: > But why do I have two separate 2.5 Python installs, compiled w/ > different options, in the first place? It's weird and I'd like to fix > it, I think (outside of building PyLucene, for my own sanity). One (the one in /Library) is the Python.org install, which I avoid

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
Andi Vajda wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: Anyway, finally, a little bruised from the whole process, and wondering what other Python things on my Mac may now be broken... I was able to run the tests successfully! Do not pollute your env with soft links. Use -F instead

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Andi Vajda
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: Anyway, finally, a little bruised from the whole process, and wondering what other Python things on my Mac may now be broken... I was able to run the tests successfully! Do not pollute your env with soft links. Use -F instead. Really. Maybe it'

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Andi Vajda
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: OK I was able to finally build (OS X 10.5.6) and run all tests successfully. I hit a few OS X issues that I think are my silliness/confused environment. I'll try to document them here, for future Google diggers, but note that I sort of desperatel

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
Anyway, finally, a little bruised from the whole process, and wondering what other Python things on my Mac may now be broken... I was able to run the tests successfully! Maybe it's ambitious... but I'd really love a "for the impatient...", in INSTALL, like this: pushd jcc python setup.py

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
OK I was able to finally build (OS X 10.5.6) and run all tests successfully. I hit a few OS X issues that I think are my silliness/confused environment. I'll try to document them here, for future Google diggers, but note that I sort of desperately rushed though things trying to get it to work s

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Andi Vajda
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Christian Heimes wrote: Andi Vajda wrote: In other words, you're fixing this with this patch by introducing another such inconvenience, both with a silent failure. It doesn't look like the trade off is worthwhile. This is not saying anything about the quality or clevernes

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Heimes
Andi Vajda wrote: > In other words, you're fixing this with this patch by introducing > another such inconvenience, both with a silent failure. It doesn't look > like the trade off is worthwhile. > > This is not saying anything about the quality or cleverness of the patch > itself. It taught me so

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Andi Vajda
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Christian Heimes wrote: I've attached a patch that hooks into the build process. With the patch the config file is created right before the .py files are copied into the build directory. Thanks for the patch. A few comments: def run(self): if (not os.path.ex

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Heimes
Christian Heimes wrote: [...] I forgot to include the changes in jcc/python.py. You have to rename SHARED to ENABLE_SHARED. Christian

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Heimes
Andi Vajda wrote: > Does 'install' without 'build' invoke 'build' ? > If that's the case, then yeah, there is a problem and this should be > backed out. If not, then where is the problem ? 'install' without a > prior 'build' would make no sense, no ? Yes, it does. Every step in the installation pr

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-12 Thread Michael McCandless
Andi, one small thing: when you upload a new RC, you should remove the old ones just to reduce chances for confusion... Mike Andi Vajda wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Aric Coady wrote: On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Andi Vajda wrote: With the recent release of Java Lucene 2.4.1, it's high t

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Andi Vajda
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Aric Coady wrote: On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Andi Vajda wrote: With the recent release of Java Lucene 2.4.1, it's high time PyLucene get its first release out as an Apache subproject. I hope I got all the steps right and all the things into the right place. Thanks.

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Aric Coady
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Andi Vajda wrote: With the recent release of Java Lucene 2.4.1, it's high time PyLucene get its first release out as an Apache subproject. I hope I got all the steps right and all the things into the right place. Thanks. Release candidate 1 of PyLucene 2.4.1 i

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Andi Vajda
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Christian Heimes wrote: Andi Vajda wrote: Fixed. config.py is not written when 'build' is not in the command line args anymore. I uploaded a new release candidate, rc2, to http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area. Thank you for the bug report. Your solution breaks a

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Christian Heimes
Andi Vajda wrote: > Fixed. config.py is not written when 'build' is not in the command line > args anymore. I uploaded a new release candidate, rc2, to > http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area. > > Thank you for the bug report. Your solution breaks an installation when a user doesn't call "

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Andi Vajda
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Andi Vajda wrote: Could you stop setup.py from overwriting config.py when the file already exists and "install" is used as distutils command? Not when the file already exists since that would prevent changes to setup.py from being reflected in config.py but it shouldn't

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Andi Vajda
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Christian Heimes wrote: Andi Vajda schrieb: With the recent release of Java Lucene 2.4.1, it's high time PyLucene get its first release out as an Apache subproject. I hope I got all the steps right and all the things into the right place. Release candidate 1 of PyLucene

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Christian Heimes
Andi Vajda schrieb: > > With the recent release of Java Lucene 2.4.1, it's high time PyLucene > get its first release out as an Apache subproject. I hope I got all the > steps right and all the things into the right place. > > Release candidate 1 of PyLucene 2.4.1 is available from: > > http

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Andi Vajda
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Grant Ingersoll wrote: 1. I think you need to upload your Key to a public server (i.e. pgp.mit.edu) How do I do that ? http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/ There's a place to submit a key there. Done. Andi..

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Mar 11, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Grant Ingersoll wrote: First off, I'm a total Python newbie, so bear with me... Couple of comments: 1. I think you need to upload your Key to a public server (i.e. pgp.mit.edu) How do I do that ? http://pgp.mit.edu:1

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Andi Vajda
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Grant Ingersoll wrote: First off, I'm a total Python newbie, so bear with me... Couple of comments: 1. I think you need to upload your Key to a public server (i.e. pgp.mit.edu) How do I do that ? Alternatively, it seems that you can import my key from the KEYS file in t

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Hi Andi, First off, I'm a total Python newbie, so bear with me... Couple of comments: 1. I think you need to upload your Key to a public server (i.e. pgp.mit.edu) See: @molly[1003]$ gpg --verify pylucene-2.4.1-rc1-src.tar.gz.asc gpg: Signature made Wed Mar 11 12:42:58 2009 EDT using DSA key

[VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

2009-03-11 Thread Andi Vajda
With the recent release of Java Lucene 2.4.1, it's high time PyLucene get its first release out as an Apache subproject. I hope I got all the steps right and all the things into the right place. Release candidate 1 of PyLucene 2.4.1 is available from: http://people.apache.org/~vajda/stag