On Jan 20, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Mateusz Biliński wrote:
>> This sounds like a very interesting project, I have been thinking of
>> something like that for some time. But as you said it quickly becomes
>> too large. If this gets narrowed down it could be a solid candidate.
>> Something like a code-re
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 21:22, Jorge Vargas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
>> Maybe a fun/useful project would be working on a system to make the
>> documentation more useful or browsable? E.g., a comment system or a
>> system to suggest patches. Maybe even with so
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 05:08, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Mike Orr wrote:
>> - Three Pylons CMS projects were started but last time i looked they
>> were variously abandoned, undocumented, or didn't really seem like
>> CMS's.
>
> Creating new projects that are going to be maintained long-term isn't a
>
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
>
> Iain Duncan wrote:
Writing a series of recipes (that can be tested automatically, probably
with buildbot) might be a good addition? Figuring out how to write
testable recipes is tricky, but a doable tricky.
>>> This sound
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:16 -0600, Ian Bicking wrote:
>
> Iain Duncan wrote:
> >>> Writing a series of recipes (that can be tested automatically, probably
> >>> with buildbot) might be a good addition? Figuring out how to write
> >>> testable recipes is tricky, but a doable tricky.
> >>>
> >> Th
Iain Duncan wrote:
>>> Writing a series of recipes (that can be tested automatically, probably
>>> with buildbot) might be a good addition? Figuring out how to write
>>> testable recipes is tricky, but a doable tricky.
>>>
>> This sounds like a very interesting project, I have been thinking of
>>
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 16:22 -0400, Jorge Vargas wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
> >
> > Mike Orr wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:26 AM, vArDo wrote:
> > Maybe a fun/useful project would be working on a system to make the
> > documentation more useful or brows
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Graham Higgins wrote:
> ISTM that there's a loose area pertaining to the propagation of (what
> would otherwise be) application-specific user preferences to other
> apps that are sharing a WSGI-based single sign-on environment, e.g.
> synching user display name and
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
>
> Mike Orr wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:26 AM, vArDo wrote:
> Maybe a fun/useful project would be working on a system to make the
> documentation more useful or browsable? E.g., a comment system or a
> system to suggest patches. Maybe
Mike Orr wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:26 AM, vArDo wrote:
>> I'd like to know what are priorities for these projects. Are example
>> apps (blog, cms) important or maybe CRUD is the most-wanted
>> subproject?
>>
>
>> [3] http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/pylonsprojects/Home
>
> I deleted two
> On 6 Jan 2009, at 19:44, Mike Orr wrote:
>
> > - Some sites need specifically wiki features, a la MoinMoin. I've
> > heard MoinMoin is difficult to set up in a WSGI environment and
> > integrate into a larger site, so perhaps there's something there to
> > work on.
>
> Some time ago I had a pla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On 5 Jan 2009, at 12:00, vArDo wrote:
>> Is Pylons planning to apply for participation in GSoC 2
Good question but ...
> On 6 Jan 2009, at 20:19, Christopher Barker wrote:
>> Docs, tutorials, demos, etc. are not eligible for GSoC anyway.
Persona
Mike Orr wrote:
> Ben could use some help finishing the Pylons documentation for 0.9.7,
> although that's too short a timeframe for the Summer of Code.
Docs, tutorials, demos, etc. are not eligible for GSoC anyway.
Lot's of other good ideas, though.
I think it's very helpful to have a good list
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:26 AM, vArDo wrote:
> I'd like to know what are priorities for these projects. Are example
> apps (blog, cms) important or maybe CRUD is the most-wanted
> subproject?
>
> [3] http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/pylonsprojects/Home
I deleted two of the WebHelpers-related pr
On Jan 5, 8:15 pm, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Are there any students on the list who might be interested in
> participating? Things seem to be much more successful if the student
> already has some familiarity and interest in the software and community.
> (GSoC is supposed to be a learning opportun
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:00 AM, vArDo wrote:
>
> Hi all.
> Is Pylons planning to apply for participation in GSoC 2009 [1] as
> organization? Django [2] and Turbogears [3] did it in 2008. Working
> under umbrella of PSF (as many Python projects do that [4]) is also an
> option.
>
> [1] http://code
Are there any students on the list who might be interested in
participating? Things seem to be much more successful if the student
already has some familiarity and interest in the software and community.
(GSoC is supposed to be a learning opportunity for students, but of
course that can me
vArDo wrote:
> Hi all.
> Is Pylons planning to apply for participation in GSoC 2009 [1] as
> organization? Django [2] and Turbogears [3] did it in 2008. Working
> under umbrella of PSF (as many Python projects do that [4]) is also an
> option.
I think this is a great idea. I've been involved with
Hi all.
Is Pylons planning to apply for participation in GSoC 2009 [1] as
organization? Django [2] and Turbogears [3] did it in 2008. Working
under umbrella of PSF (as many Python projects do that [4]) is also an
option.
[1] http://code.google.com/soc/
[2] http://code.google.com/soc/2008/django/a
19 matches
Mail list logo
