On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 15:41 -0500, Joe Dallago wrote:
> A paste wishlist would be great. I talked to a GSOC representative at
> PyCon, and it seems that the Pylons Project has not yet registered as
> a mentoring organization, just fyi.
Pylons will not register as a project; we'll register as a Py
On 2011-3-17 15:59, Dylan Jay wrote:
So I think it's compelling to describe traversal in the manual as an
advanced routing feature and make it more clear exactly what scenarios
traversal is good for and why it's a great solution for those. I don't
think that means moving traversal to the back bec
A paste wishlist would be great. I talked to a GSOC representative at
PyCon, and it seems that the Pylons Project has not yet registered as
a mentoring organization, just fyi.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
> No objections, although it's too early to commit to specific GSOC
> p
No objections, although it's too early to commit to specific GSOC
project yet. I was going to say that somebody just announced a project
to revamp PasteScript/PasteDeploy, but it looks like that somebody is
you. So maybe some of that could come under GSOC. BTW, I'm going to
post a wishlist of featu
I too would like to participate in GSOC. I have spoken to Whit
Morris, and he has has agreed to sponsor me. I was thinking that
re-factoring Paste(serve and create) could be my project. Any
objections?
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Joel Bohman wrote:
> Hello!
> Great news, I would very much
On 05/03/2011, at 7:00 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Peter Alexis
wrote:
I mentioned "unless there are new magical docs", because I think 99%
of the problems with pyramid right now are the docs. They're hard
to
sift through (rather dense) and easy to miss things in
