--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
It's clear now :) My current implementation allows only for group
snapshots if the storage supports it, and regular sequential snapshots
otherwise. Due to the considerations around
application/crash-consistency, it would be best to let the user pick
(with a default s
On Wed Nov 20, 2024 at 5:10 PM CET, Ivaylo Markov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been caught up in other things and it's been a while, but as I was
> collating and testing my proposed changes, I came across this again and
> thought I'd clarify something.
>
> On 08/10/2024 13:50, Max Carrara wrote:
> >>
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
I've been caught up in other things and it's been a while, but as I was
collating and testing my proposed changes, I came across this again and
thought I'd clarify something.
On 08/10/2024 13:50, Max Carrara wrote:
I was directed here to discuss this proposal and
--- Begin Message ---
Hi
On 08/10/2024 13:50, Max Carrara wrote:
On Fri Oct 4, 2024 at 3:54 PM CEST, Ivaylo Markov wrote:
Greetings,
I am the maintainer of StorPool’s external storage plugin for PVE[0]
which integrates our storage solution as a backend for VM disks. Our
software has the abilit
On Fri Oct 4, 2024 at 3:54 PM CEST, Ivaylo Markov wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am the maintainer of StorPool’s external storage plugin for PVE[0]
> which integrates our storage solution as a backend for VM disks. Our
> software has the ability to create atomic (crash-consistent) snapshots
> of a gr
ox VE development discussion
À: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Cc: Ivaylo Markov
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] Proposal: support for atomic snapshot of all VM
disks at once
Date: 07/10/2024 09:27:09
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On 07/10/2024 09:12, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
Dietmar Maurer hat am 04.10.2024 17:13 CEST geschrieben:
I am the maintainer of StorPool’s external storage plugin for PVE[0]
which integrates our storage solution as a backend for VM disks. Our
software has the ability t
--- Begin Message ---
- Le 4 Oct 24, à 17:13, Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com a écrit :
> We already make sure that shaphots of a group of volumes are atomic at qemu
> level (VM is halted while snapshots are created), so I wonder
> if there is any real advantage here?
I think there could
> Dietmar Maurer hat am 04.10.2024 17:13 CEST geschrieben:
> > I am the maintainer of StorPool’s external storage plugin for PVE[0]
> > which integrates our storage solution as a backend for VM disks. Our
> > software has the ability to create atomic (crash-consistent) snapshots
> > of a group
> I am the maintainer of StorPool’s external storage plugin for PVE[0]
> which integrates our storage solution as a backend for VM disks. Our
> software has the ability to create atomic (crash-consistent) snapshots
> of a group of storage volumes.
We already make sure that shaphots of a group
--- Begin Message ---
Greetings,
I am the maintainer of StorPool’s external storage plugin for PVE[0]
which integrates our storage solution as a backend for VM disks. Our
software has the ability to create atomic (crash-consistent) snapshots
of a group of storage volumes. I’d like to use this
11 matches
Mail list logo
