*** BLURB HERE ***
Achim Dreyer (1):
Fix numbering scheme detection for CentOS Stream releases.
Stream releases contain only the major version number.
src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.28.0
_
Signed-off-by: Achim Dreyer
---
src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm b/src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm
index 0825273..aab0488 100644
--- a/src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm
@@ -19,7 +19,
On 03.10.20 13:15, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm - will that actually work?
>>>
>>> My understanding was that for Proxmox you had to use the Proxmox-specific
>>> Ceph packages - just like there's a Proxmox-specific kernel etc.
>
> Proxmox don't have any extra patch on ceph package, so you
>>Why do you need 10s resulution? Isn't 1min good enough?
Well, if the 1min is an average of 10s metric, it's ok.
I'm currently using 1min average and 5min average, so it's not a problem
with current rrds.
Thanks for the informations !
(I'll resend a patch to add pressure to rrd, and also add v
On 12.10.20 17:34, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
>
> This patchset follows the fix in 609f117ff24d2cff6b155e1d4b1175ceebe5bd7b.
> Since several operations rely on values read from the remote target's
> LIO config (which is tainted), this patchset untaints the settings, which are
> actually needed (and stor
> BTW, I'm currently playing with reading the rrd files, and I have notice than
> lower precision is 1minute.
> as pvestatd send values around each 10s, is this 1minute precision an average
> of 6x10s values send by pvestatd ?
Yes (we also store the MAX)
> I'm currently working on a poc of vm b
