I would have no problem trying either one of these, but the PHB-objections I
face are that these do not come from Red Hat or a "reliable source". They
might trust them if they came from PuppetLabs' repository, but even that is no
guarantee. They are inconsistently paranoid about what they will
You might have the best luck going the route of "Well, my puppetmaster
needs RHEL6 and that's the only way it's supported" because then you get
1.8.7 from an "official source". I completely sympathise with your
situation, having been in it before.
Your understanding is right to the best of my kno
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 08:29, Dan White wrote:
> I would have no problem trying either one of these, but the PHB-objections I
> face are that these do not come from Red Hat or a "reliable source". They
> might trust them if they came from PuppetLabs' repository, but even that is
> no guarantee.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Ashley Penney wrote:
> I think that would be OK. I'm actually fairly nervous about this new move
> towards dragging
> more and more out of the core into modules. It wouldn't be so bad if
> Puppet had a proper
> "packaging system" that handled dependencies and s
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Chip Schweiss wrote:
> I'm in the process of scalling my puppet master to two server with a
> separate CA. My plan was to establish a new CA and reissue
> certificates. Part way through the process I noticed a behavior that
> seems a bit alarming.
>
> With one
On Apr 13, 10:49 am, Munna S <19.mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I followed your steps. now i am getting below error
>
> Apr 13 17:42:44 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[7899]: Could not find class
> dev_jboss_jeeva for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
...
> i have jeeva_base.pp file under /etc/puppet/manifests/no
On Apr 12, 4:01 pm, Michael Elsdörfer wrote:
> In general, the loading/import/namespacing mechanism is really something
> that I cannot wrap my head around, even after reading the relevant sections
> in the documentation.
>
> Specifically, I'm trying to put together a module. I believe I have the
On 12-04-13 03:06 PM, Ashley Penney wrote:
> I'm actually fairly nervous about this new move towards dragging
> more and more out of the core into modules. It wouldn't be so bad if
> Puppet had a proper
> "packaging system" that handled dependencies and so forth, but as it
> stands I'm just worrie
Well, i think there's a big difference between things that are
standard in a linux distro and modules that are 3rd party software
like nagios.
Besides I think this is all adressed by what Nigel just mentioned: the
moduel tool does dependency stuff starting with Telly.
cheers,
Walter
On Mon, Apr
On Friday, April 13, 2012 3:06:52 PM UTC-4, Ashley Penney wrote:
>
> I think that would be OK. I'm actually fairly nervous about this new move
> towards dragging
> more and more out of the core into modules. It wouldn't be so bad if
> Puppet had a proper
> "packaging system" that handled depend
10 matches
Mail list logo
