On 12-04-13 03:06 PM, Ashley Penney wrote: > I'm actually fairly nervous about this new move towards dragging > more and more out of the core into modules. It wouldn't be so bad if > Puppet had a proper > "packaging system" that handled dependencies and so forth, but as it > stands I'm just worried > about reaching a situation where we're constantly telling people in > #puppet "oh, well first > you need to get stdlib, nagios, yum, this, that, etc, that's why you > can't do this".
humm I must agree with this. Since the types by themselves are not a module per-se, could it be better to package them in the same manner as the core is packaged, and made available through the same resources? so then, people could install those with gem, apt or yum. (and easily require those automatically from actual modules) -- Gabriel Filion -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
