Re: [Puppet Users] Trying to run a testbed on a new VM

2012-01-04 Thread Felix Frank
On 01/04/2012 04:18 AM, Dan White wrote: >> Have you tried importing that very file instead of *.pp? > I could, but I plan to add more node files. I'd still like you to try. Moreover, what does a 'grep -r ^node manifests/' yield? It appears as though your puppt apply was using an empty node defin

Re: [Puppet Users] Changing of the guard: Puppet Labs Open Source team changes...

2012-01-04 Thread Walter Heck
Good luck in your new position! I think the FOSS version of puppet is very important for the spreading of puppet technology (I know small shops like mine couldn't use it if it wasn't FOSS). Have fun with the Puppet Platform team! On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 20:41, Daniel Pittman wrote: > G'day. > > A

[Puppet Users] Mildly disconcerting problem with a 2.6.7 client and 2.7.9 master

2012-01-04 Thread John Hawkes-Reed
Hello. In testing a potential upgrade from 2.6.7 -> 2.7.9 I ran across the following 'interesting' behaviour: The relevant section of manifest (postfixconf::generic) looks like this: file { "/etc/aliases": mode => 444, source => [ "puppet:///modules/postfixconf

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet for patch management

2012-01-04 Thread Felix Frank
Hi, On 12/28/2011 02:26 PM, sanjiv singh wrote: > If i trigger puppet client, than i will fetches all from puppet > master and deploy on it. the complete catalog is fetched, that is true. However, the agent will only touch resources that *do* need a change due running in your development environ

Re: [Puppet Users] Help with some script

2012-01-04 Thread Felix Frank
Hi, On 12/29/2011 11:29 PM, Ola wrote: > Hello > So i used this guide > http://itand.me/using-puppet-to-manage-users-passwords-and-ss > to set it up similar. Now want to do small modification. What i want > is to have all the users defined in a speciall file or a folder where > all the users are

[Puppet Users] Re: Making a system user member of a Puppet managed group

2012-01-04 Thread jcbollinger
On Jan 4, 12:48 am, Gonzalo Servat wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a particular requirement where a Puppet managed group needs to have > several members that are either local and not managed by Puppet (e.g. > mysql) or they reside in LDAP. > > Apart from running an exec call to "groupmems", is there

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Making a system user member of a Puppet managed group

2012-01-04 Thread Gonzalo Servat
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:00 AM, jcbollinger wrote: > > It depends on the Group provider, which usually depends on operating > system. If you are using the default Group provider for AIX, OS X, or > Windows, then group membership is managed as an attribute of the group > instead of the user. In t

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Inventory Service

2012-01-04 Thread Christopher Johnston
Puppet dev can help? I modified auth.conf and it did not seem to help. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Christopher Johnston wrote: > I have multiple masters (40+) that reside in remote locations, I want to > have them send puppet inventory data to a central inventory with mysql. > Once the data

Re: [Puppet Users] Is it possible to conditionally replace a file ?

2012-01-04 Thread Thomas Bellman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-11-28 16:01, Dan White wrote: > In my users class, I want to be able to push out custom dot-files when > the user account is first created. > Unfortunately, if one sets user:managehome => true, the dotfiles are > created by default and the cus

Re: [Puppet Users] Mildly disconcerting problem with a 2.6.7 client and 2.7.9 master

2012-01-04 Thread Brice Figureau
Hi, On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:51 +, John Hawkes-Reed wrote: > Hello. > > In testing a potential upgrade from 2.6.7 -> 2.7.9 I ran across the following > 'interesting' behaviour: > > The relevant section of manifest (postfixconf::generic) looks like this: > > file { "/etc/aliases": >

Re: [Puppet Users] Mildly disconcerting problem with a 2.6.7 client and 2.7.9 master

2012-01-04 Thread John Hawkes-Reed
On 4 Jan 2012, at 16:31, Brice Figureau wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:51 +, John Hawkes-Reed wrote: >> Hello. >> >> In testing a potential upgrade from 2.6.7 -> 2.7.9 I ran across the >> following 'interesting' behaviour: >> >> The relevant section of manifest (postfixconf::ge

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Making a system user member of a Puppet managed group

2012-01-04 Thread Josh Cooper
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:00 AM, jcbollinger wrote: > If you are using the default Group provider for AIX, OS X, or > Windows, then group membership is managed as an attribute of the group > instead of the user. Windows can actually manage 'members' as an attribute of the group, or 'groups' as an

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Inventory Service

2012-01-04 Thread Nan Liu
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Christopher Johnston wrote: > I have multiple masters (40+) that reside in remote locations, I want to > have them send puppet inventory data to a central inventory with mysql. > Once the data is there I would like puppet dashboard installation use that > data.  I

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Dashboard: db:migrate failure (1.2.2 to 1.2.4)

2012-01-04 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 18:31, Russell Van Tassell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 16:01, Russell Van Tassell >> wrote: >> >> > For completeness sake, the subsequent error (with trace) is thus... I >> > think >> > at this point, I'm likely

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Inventory Service

2012-01-04 Thread Christopher Johnston
So in my auth.conf I have this currently (below), which I think is supposed to say allow any traffic in from any master I guess I could put those hostnames in for the puppet hosts with something like puppet*.company.com. Do I require SSL auth here? I am just sending inventory information to a des

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Inventory Service

2012-01-04 Thread Nan Liu
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Christopher Johnston wrote: > If it is a requirement that I have a signed CA, that could be an issue as I > have two puppet masters in each datacenter that has its own shared CA across > those two puppet masters only (certname = puppet).  I don't have one signed >

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Inventory Service

2012-01-04 Thread Christopher Johnston
My inventory server is a puppetmaster, but its master of itself and is only being using for inventory services. If I point new clients to it will work fine. So think of my setup like this: puppet1.company.com and puppet2.company.com are two dedicated servers in each datacenter that handle local

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Inventory Service

2012-01-04 Thread Nan Liu
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Christopher Johnston wrote: > My inventory server is a puppetmaster, but its master of itself and is only > being using for inventory services.  If I point new clients to it will work > fine. > > So think of my setup like this: > > puppet1.company.com and puppet2.c

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Inventory Service

2012-01-04 Thread Christopher Johnston
That could get ugly, so I would have to create one CA, sign it then distribute it to all of my masters. Then also delete my certs on the clients and re-issue new ones. Is my thinking correct here? -Chris On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Nan Liu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Christo

[Puppet Users] debuging dashboard - RH61 puppet agent shows changes, dashboard doesn't

2012-01-04 Thread Vince Taluskie
I'm trying to debug an issue I'm noticing on RHEL 6.1 puppet clients and reporting. I've got dashboard v1.1.0 running under apache passenger with 26 nodes.It's been pretty good for reporting status and this is the first time i've come across an issue. The issue appears to be cropping up on

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Inventory Service

2012-01-04 Thread Greg
The way I've done it in the past is that you have one Puppet instance dedicated to the initial Puppet run.. It handles the CA plus farms out a puppet.conf which contains the local server info. The main issue I found is that Puppet doesn't seem to change masters without a restart even though it say

[Puppet Users] Re: Agents seem to hang during updates, Run already in progress; skipping

2012-01-04 Thread Radek
Hi Vorik, Did you solve your problem? I'm having the same issue with the 2.7.9 on CentOS and Amazon Linux. Puppet agent stops polling for configs and it tells me it's in progress when I run it manually. -- Radek -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

[Puppet Users] Puppet Dashboard and Ruby 1.8.7 for EL5 systems HOWTO (draft)

2012-01-04 Thread Jo Rhett
NOTE: this is a draft document, just because there are some things here that I'd really like to improve. Please let me know if you have a better way to do these things. There's also a few issues with Puppet Dashboard that appear to be bugs that need either improved documentation or changes to

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet for patch management

2012-01-04 Thread Dan White
As far as control of software package versions, I would think you could use the "ensure" metaparameter for the "package" type package { "foo": ... ensure => "1.2.3.4.5-1", ... } as opposed to package { "foo": ... ensure => latest, ... } The first one would give you more

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Dashboard and Ruby 1.8.7 for EL5 systems HOWTO (draft)

2012-01-04 Thread Brian Gallew
Very nice write-up, Jo. Thanks. On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Jo Rhett wrote: > NOTE: this is a draft document, just because there are some things here > that I'd really like to improve. Please let me know if you have a better > way to do these things. There's also a few issues with Puppet

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Dashboard and Ruby 1.8.7 for EL5 systems HOWTO (draft)

2012-01-04 Thread Ohad Levy
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Jo Rhett wrote: First many thanks for your efforts! > 3. Foreman requires Ruby 1.8.7 > Just wanted to correct that, the upcoming version would, but we still maintain a supported version 0.4.x that works on RHEL5 with no issues. Thanks, Ohad -- You received t

Re: [SPAM] [Puppet Users] In CentOS 6, puppet Unresponsive

2012-01-04 Thread Nicolas Aizier
Got nearly 300 servers in RHEL 6.0, 6.1 and 6.2 all managed by puppet and 20 of them got that behavior. It's not related to the RHEL version neither the kernel version. Still digging on my side, if anyone find a solution please post. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to th

Re: [SPAM] [Puppet Users] In CentOS 6, puppet Unresponsive

2012-01-04 Thread Juan-Francisco Diez
I try to downgrade the puppet client and after that it still hang. All puppet software with the same version but the problem still there. 2012/1/5 Nicolas Aizier > Got nearly 300 servers in RHEL 6.0, 6.1 and 6.2 all managed by puppet and > 20 of them got that behavior. > It's not related to the