Chris Phillips wrote:
On 10 June 2011 02:50, Jacob Helwig wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
>
> One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting is
> that it's difficult to create something r
On 10 Jun 2011 07:52, "Jacob Helwig" wrote:
>
> Chris Phillips wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10 June 2011 02:50, Jacob Helwig wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>>> >
>>> > https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
>>> >
>>> > One problem people producing modules t
Hi,
I've been upgrading from Debian Lenny to Squeeze and now many of my
puppet modules are failing with the message "Could not find
resource(s) X for overriding on node Y". I've isolated the problem case
and apparently properties of defined resources may not be overridden
anymore in recent version
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 18:50 -0700, Jacob Helwig wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> >
> > https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
> >
> > One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting is
> > that it's difficult to create something reu
On 10 June 2011 09:06, Brice Figureau wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 18:50 -0700, Jacob Helwig wrote:
> > On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> > >
> > > https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
> > >
> > > One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are
>
Hi again,
Am Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:00:28 +0200
schrieb Lorenz Schori :
> Debian Squeeze / Puppet 2.6.2
> [...]
> Could not find resource(s) M[test] for overriding on node
> puppet-squeeze
I've now verified that this problem was not present in the latest
legacy version 0.25.5 (install
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 10:00 +0200, Lorenz Schori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been upgrading from Debian Lenny to Squeeze and now many of my
> puppet modules are failing with the message "Could not find
> resource(s) X for overriding on node Y". I've isolated the problem case
> and apparently properties
On 08-06-11 16:29, Chris Phillips wrote:
> updated, and hopefully finished:
>
> Facter.add(:bp_nagios_hostgroups) do
> setcode do
>
> if FileTest.exists?("/var/lib/puppet/classes.txt")
> bp_nagios_hostgroups = ""
> File.open("/var/lib/puppet/classes.txt") { |fi
Puppet already has stage[ Main ] which is the only
stage it needs to define. All other stages
can be defined relative to main and each other, and should
be a matter of convention. So I think it would be more
fruitful to talk about the purpose of stages, along with
their proposed names.
For exam
Hi,
you need to do one of these:
a) create a DNS entry for "puppet" pointing to your master
b) create a hosts entry for "puppet" pointing to your master
c) specify the --server parameter with an address resolving to your master
d) add a server= entry to your puppet.conf
HTH,
Felix
On 05/27/2011
On Jun 10, 3:06 am, Brice Figureau
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 18:50 -0700, Jacob Helwig wrote:
> > On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> > >https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
>
> > > One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting
> >
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Jacob Helwig wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> >
> > https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
> >
> > One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting
> is
> > that it's difficult to create something reus
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Vagn Scott wrote:
> Puppet already has stage[ Main ] which is the only
> stage it needs to define. All other stages
> can be defined relative to main and each other, and should
> be a matter of convention.
This is true, but only if you don't care about sharing
On 06/10/2011 08:55 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
Maybe what is needed is an easier way to perform two or more
successive puppet runs in different environments.
It would be nice to have a puppet restart command.
Tell puppet that it should reinitialize and try again.
Then you could, as you say, ha
Am Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:08:28 +0200
schrieb Brice Figureau :
> [...]
> I think puppet is looking M in the scope of C, but not in the scope
> of P anymore.
> Can you rewrite it like this and test:
>
> class c inherits p {
>P::M["test"] {
> message => "overridden",
>}
>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
>
> One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting is
> that it's difficult to create something reusable that integrates seamlessly
> into existing setups.
>
> This feature
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Dan Bode wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>> https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
>>
>> One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting
>> is that it's difficult to create something reusable that i
On Jun 9, 10:20 am, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to enhance the classical package/configuration/service pattern
> with an additional stage: configuration syntax checking. The goal is to
> ensure a service won't be restarted with an invalid configuration first,
> but also to ensu
user {'username':
uid => 501,
gid => 'staff',
comment => 'comment',
ensure => present,
home => '/Users/sysop',
shell=>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:51 AM, vella1tj wrote:
> user {'username':
>uid => 501,
>gid => 'staff',
>comment => 'comment',
>ensure => present,
>home =
Helwig:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:29:12 -0500, Jennings, Jared L CTR USAF AFMC 46
> SK/CCI wrote:
> > pwck indeed behaves nicely with its exitcodes - the problem is I
want
> > the output to be an err, not a notice
>
> exec { 'pwck -r':
> path => '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin',
> log
Thanks going to try that right now sorry that the error wasn't more
helpful.
On Jun 10, 11:09 am, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:51 AM, vella1tj wrote:
> > user {'username':
> > uid => 501,
> > gid => 'staff',
> >
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:34 AM, vella1tj wrote:
> Thanks going to try that right now sorry that the error wasn't more
> helpful.
>
You're completely misunderstanding me :) The error not being helpful is
Puppet's fault, not yours at all :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
trying to get started and this doesn't seem to be working as intended - clearly
pebkac
# puppet agent --server ubuntu.ttinet --waitforcert 60 --test
info: Caching catalog for ubuntu.ttinet
info: Applying configuration version '1307724789'
notice: Finished catalog run in 0.01 seconds
# puppet cer
This is what I would like to do.
define normal_user($fullname, $groups) {
$username = $name
user { "$username" :
ensure => present,
allowdupe => false,
shell => '/bin/bash',
home=> "/home/${username}",
gid => $username,
On 10.6.2011 21:18, JoE wrote:
> This is what I would like to do.
>
> define normal_user($fullname, $groups) {
> $username = $name
> user { "$username" :
> ensure => present,
> allowdupe => false,
> shell => '/bin/bash',
> home=> "/home/
Any of you folks have any good tests that you use to make sure a module has
completed successfully? Any best practice suggestions?
I looked around on the www but didn't see anything about this. Please point
me in the right direction if I missed it.
thanks,
guy
--
You received this message bec
I have the same question.
I will need to verify if the services are up after the puppet catalog is
applied.
Currently I have to use a shell script to do it. It will be great if it can
be defined as puppet script and included in the module.
-Yushu
+---
Shouldn't your catalog apply any changes to the services then, and just
notify yourself on failures?
Or am I missing a bigger picture here?
From: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
[mailto:puppet-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Yushu Yao
Sent: F
Guy Matz wrote:
Any of you folks have any good tests that you use to make sure a module
has completed successfully? Any best practice suggestions?
I looked around on the www but didn't see anything about this. Please
point me in the right direction if I missed it.
thanks,
Have you had a loo
Hi,
What is the response of the following:
$ openssl s_client -connection ubuntu.ttinet:8140
Can you make the connection from the client?
Cheers,
Den
On 11/06/2011, at 3:40, Craig White wrote:
> trying to get started and this doesn't seem to be working as intended -
> clearly pebkac
>
> #
On Jun 10, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Denmat wrote:
> openssl s_client -connection ubuntu.ttinet:8140
-connection was a problem but -connect is valid
from ubuntu2 (intended puppet client system)
openssl s_client -connect ubuntu.ttinet:8140
connect: Connection refused
connect:errno=111
from ubuntu (
Dear all,
This is my script in the bash: how can I put it into puppet?
#!/usr/bin/env bash
CONF_DIR="/var/mom_priv"
CPU_COUNT=`cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep siblings | uniq | cut -d\ -f2`
ideal_load_var=$(echo "scale=2; ${CPU_COUNT}+0.5" | bc)
max_load_var=$(echo "scale=2; ${CPU_COUNT}*1.2" | bc)
On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Sans wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This is my script in the bash: how can I put it into puppet?
>
> #!/usr/bin/env bash
>
> CONF_DIR="/var/mom_priv"
> CPU_COUNT=`cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep siblings | uniq | cut -d\ -f2`
>
> ideal_load_var=$(echo "scale=2; ${CPU_COUNT}+0.
Sorry, phone using auto complete..
Okay, there is a connection issue between your client and server. Puppet
clients need to reach the server on that port.
Is there a firewall in between? Can you connect on the server with the external
ip address? Can you connect from the client using the serve
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Jacob Helwig wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> >
>> > https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
>> >
>> > One problem people producing modules that make use of stag
36 matches
Mail list logo
