On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Nigel Kersten <ni...@puppetlabs.com> wrote:
> https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697 > > One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting is > that it's difficult to create something reusable that integrates seamlessly > into existing setups. > > This feature request is to add several more implicit stages to Puppet so we > have: > > bootstrap > pre > main > post > > existing by default, making it easier for authors to specify stages in > their modules. > I agree it would be convenient to have implicit stages (and I opened the ticket :) ). Even with these implicit stages, it would still be hard to use them in a reusable way in modules b/c stages can only be applied to param classes. > Thoughts? > > -- > Nigel Kersten > Product, Puppet Labs > @nigelkersten > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
