This is a huge +1 from me
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Kevin Beckford wrote:
> This certainly explains a lot. A very good idea, IMO.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users
On 14 Mar 2011, at 22:52, Jonathan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering if anyone knows if work is still being done on this
> provider.
>
> At present, one is not able to ensure that a particular version is
> installed and this is crucial for a job that I need to do. Last
> activity on this seem
On 14-03-11 22:31, Brandon Metcalf wrote:
> I'm using the module https://github.com/sansnoc/puppet/tree/master/users
> but running into a problem where puppet can't find a class. In /etc/
> puppet/manifests/nodes.pp I have
>
> node basenode {
>include hosts
>include groups::namidev
>i
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Mikael Fridh wrote:
> First run of puppet performs a configsync and an attempt to load the
> downloaded plugins, the provider fails to be found by puppet in this
> first run, another re-run of puppet is needed for the provider to
> work, see debug output below.
>
>
> I''d wonder where you change the option though. In the environment level
> options on the master? Also, I'm thinking you'd also need a syntax that
> reverses it for looking at facts that might not exist for something like this:
> non_strict("cpuid")
> to replace the expression:
> $cpuid
> if
Thanks. This is what I thought and I tried moving that class to a
module named groups to no avail. I'll revisit to see what I did wrong.
On Mar 15, 2011, at 4:48, Martijn Grendelman wrote:
> On 14-03-11 22:31, Brandon Metcalf wrote:
>> I'm using the module https://github.com/sansnoc/puppet/tre
Hi,
I have a type named apt::package, that installs packages on Debian base
systems. By default, it sets the schedule to something I defined, to
prevent package updates from happening outside maintenance hours.
Now, in a specific class, I do this:
# This is normally a manual puppet run, so ignor
Hi Brian
The problem isn't the lack of output from the puppet custom function. I have
written some that return results.
I used puts statements in the example to show the absence of result from the
%x[] statement without having to write some convoluted manifest and puppet
output.
The %x[] state
On 03/15/2011 03:25 AM, David Kavanagh wrote:
> Has anyone come up with a preferred method of messing with grub? I need
> to install a hypervisor (like xen or kvm) and modify the grub.conf to
> make the machine boot from the new kernel.
> I might mess with Augeas. What do the experts say?
Hi,
don
We are using ruby-entreprise, instead of redhat's default ruby I
was trying to deploy the needed gem using:
/opt/ruby-enterprise/bin/gem install --no-rdoc --no-ri
/tmp/ruby-augeas-0.3.0.gem
But found out this would require gcc to be installed!
How can I preb-build this gem to remove the nee
Am 08.03.2011 23:37, schrieb Robin Bowes:
> I'd really like puppet to blow-up at this stage and tell me that I've
> used an variable without defining it first. Those familiar with perl
> will recognise this as "use strict;".
I would greatly appreciate such a feature.
Is there already a ticket to
Am 15.03.2011 03:25, schrieb David Kavanagh:
> Has anyone come up with a preferred method of messing with grub? I need to
> install a hypervisor (like xen or kvm) and modify the grub.conf to make the
> machine boot from the new kernel.
> I might mess with Augeas. What do the experts say?
We use Pu
On 15 March 2011 20:38, Mohamed Lrhazi wrote:
> We are using ruby-entreprise, instead of redhat's default ruby I
> was trying to deploy the needed gem using:
>
> /opt/ruby-enterprise/bin/gem install --no-rdoc --no-ri
> /tmp/ruby-augeas-0.3.0.gem
>
> But found out this would require gcc to be
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Martijn Grendelman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a type named apt::package, that installs packages on Debian base
> systems. By default, it sets the schedule to something I defined, to
> prevent package updates from happening outside maintenance hours.
>
> Now, in a spec
I was hoping for one magic command, like :
/opt/ruby-enterprise/bin/gem rebuild-gem --no-rdoc --no-ri
/tmp/ruby-augeas-0.3.0.gem
I guess I have to learn and do it myself. thanks a lot for the tips and refs.
Mohamed.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Naresh V wrote:
> On 15 March 2011 20:38,
In that case I've got nothing. Sorry.
On Mar 15, 2011, at 6:37 AM, duff wrote:
> Hi Brian
>
> The problem isn't the lack of output from the puppet custom function. I have
> written some that return results.
> I used puts statements in the example to show the absence of result from the
> %x[]
On 14/03/11 22:52, Jonathan wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone knows if work is still being done on this
> provider.
Yep, best to follow the ticket, that has the latest news and follow
puppet-dev for a little bit of discussion:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4258
It's feeling pretty solid a
Hello folks,
I am getting this error on one of the clients, here's all of the
output. It was working on this client and today it stopped working. I
cleaned the cert for this client puppetmaster by "puppetca --clean
host.domain.com" and I removed the "/var/lib/puppet/ssl" directory so
it would get n
ah, please disregard. It seems I found the problem, there is a
firewall that is blocking the port which I found when I tried to check
the cert
# openssl s_client -connect henson.lab.nbttech.com:8140
CONNECTED(0003)
14010:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake
failure:s23_lib.c:
I've got thousands of node definitions under manifests/nodes and don't
see any way to avoid documenting them when calling puppetdoc. Am I
missing something?
puppetdoc --all -m rdoc --modulepath modules --manifestdir manifests
manifests/site.pp
I've tried commenting out the lines in site.pp that i
On 15/03/11 22:14, windowsrefund wrote:
> I've got thousands of node definitions under manifests/nodes and don't
> see any way to avoid documenting them when calling puppetdoc. Am I
> missing something?
To my knowledge it's not possible directly.
> puppetdoc --all -m rdoc --modulepath modules --m
hello list!!
I have developed a custom apache module for my company that setups up
our own particular config of httpd and php in order to run our sites..
However, there is one wrinkle. It take two puppet runs to start the
httpd service with this module and we'd like to get that down to one
run!
On 3/15/2011 6:40 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
hello list!!
I have developed a custom apache module for my company that setups up
our own particular config of httpd and php in order to run our sites..
However, there is one wrinkle. It take two puppet runs to start the
httpd service with this module a
Hi,
May not be the best solution, but you could keep the ssl.conf file declaration
but it's source could be made harmless, ie, have a file called ssl.conf that
has the httpd directives hashed out.
That way the file can exist but not interfere.
There maybe better ways though.
Cheers,
On 16/
24 matches
Mail list logo
