On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 08:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Matt Wallace
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're writing a few scripts at the moment that could really
> make use of
> Facter, however the vast majority of them team (
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 12:22 -0400, Darren Chamberlain wrote:
> * Richard Crowley [2010/10/22 08:57]:
> > > We're writing a few scripts at the moment that could really make
> > > use of Facter, however the vast majority of them team (including
> > > my self!) are not proficient in Ruby, however the
Any reason you can't use facter the command line?
E.g. call in python commands.getstatusoutput("facter")
On Oct 24, 2010, at 12:41 AM, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 08:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Matt Wallace
>> wrote:
>
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 14:57 -0700, Matt Wise wrote:
> Agreed... I use extlookup for our external arrays — but I cannot use it for
> hash's. Hashes are sometimes the only sane way to go, so I'm hoping to see
> more advanced hash support soon. Really we have a case where we're going to
> be pullin
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 00:44 -0700, Yushu Yao wrote:
> Any reason you can't use facter the command line?
> E.g. call in python commands.getstatusoutput("facter")
Because it's a dirty hack? ;)
We've inherited a system where loads of stuff that could be done with
shared libraries in various language
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace writes:
> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 00:44 -0700, Yushu Yao wrote:
>
>> Any reason you can't use facter the command line?
>> E.g. call in python commands.getstatusoutput("facter")
>
> Because it's a dirty hack? ;)
Internally facter does a lot of the same, FWIW. ;)
I think wh
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> Matthew Macdonald-Wallace writes:
>> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 00:44 -0700, Yushu Yao wrote:
>>
>>> Any reason you can't use facter the command line?
>>> E.g. call in python commands.getstatusoutput("facter")
>>
>> Because it's a dirty hack? ;)
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Daniel Pittman
> wrote:
> > Matthew Macdonald-Wallace writes:
> >> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 00:44 -0700, Yushu Yao wrote:
> >>
> >>> Any reason you can't use facter the command line?
> >>> E.g. call in python c
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jon Charette wrote:
> Trying to debug something simple that I'm sure I'm just missing.
>
> I create a module, mysql. Code is at http://www.pastie.org/1218470
>
> I try to apply it and I get the following error:
>
> err: No source module metadata provided for mysql
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Jeff McCune wrote:
> To save you some hassle in the future, I recommend not defining new
> fileserver mount points and instead use a module to distribute the
> files.
>
I wanted to reiterate this. I see a lot of people creating fileserver mount
points, and it rea
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
> I highly suggest you refrain from using Puppet to manage service-level
> applications.
What has led you to this viewpoint Scott?
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:19 AM, ajax wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I wanted to know can i deploy Applic
I know James has emailed about this before, but we have a lot of issue
prioritization to sort out in the very near future, so I wanted to make sure
the community is aware of ways you can communicate your own priorities to us
so we can take this into account.
This does require that you have an acco
+1
;-D
On Oct 24, 8:41 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> I know James has emailed about this before, but we have a lot of issue
> prioritization to sort out in the very near future, so I wanted to make sure
> the community is aware of ways you can communicate your own priorities to us
> so we can take
Nigel Kersten writes:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> Matthew Macdonald-Wallace writes:
>>> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 00:44 -0700, Yushu Yao wrote:
[...]
>> I think what you probably want is 'facter --yaml', which emits the data in
>> a format easily consumed by other a
Nigel Kersten writes:
> I know James has emailed about this before, but we have a lot of issue
> prioritization to sort out in the very near future, so I wanted to make sure
> the community is aware of ways you can communicate your own priorities to us
> so we can take this into account.
>
> This
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> Nigel Kersten writes:
>
> > I know James has emailed about this before, but we have a lot of issue
> > prioritization to sort out in the very near future, so I wanted to make
> sure
> > the community is aware of ways you can communicate yo
Hi,
So what do u thing is good and better than Puppet ?
thanks
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
>
>> I highly suggest you refrain from using Puppet to manage service-level
>> applications.
>
>
> What has led you to
17 matches
Mail list logo
