Hello All,
So, I realize this is a common issue, but still can't identify
the problem here. Even after reading similar posts... Essentially,
I'm exporting / collecting hosts via stored configs..
Here's my export class:
class basic::export{
@@host { $fqdn: ip => $ipaddress, host_alias
Hi,
I have a couple of FreeBSD-servers that I try to manage using puppet.
I'm just trying it out at the moment and have just deployed 5 new
boxes (from PXE and scripted installation so supposedly they are all
identical except for the name and ip-addresses). On two of the servers
I get the error-mes
Additional information:
I have auto-sign turned on and the certificates are signed (at lease
they show up in "puppet cert --list --all").
/Freddie
On Sep 21, 4:19 pm, FreddieB wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a couple of FreeBSD-servers that I try to manage using puppet.
> I'm just trying it out at the mom
On Sep 21, 2010, at 7:04 AM, CraftyTech wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> So, I realize this is a common issue, but still can't identify
> the problem here. Even after reading similar posts... Essentially,
> I'm exporting / collecting hosts via stored configs..
> Here's my export class:
>
> class b
Thanks for your response, but host_aliases is part of the host type.
See below:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/references/0.25.5/type.html#host :
host
Installs and manages host entries. For most systems, these entries
will just be in /etc/hosts, but some systems (notably OS X) will have
different sol
Hi all,
I have a requirement and decided to test puppet on the win32 platform to see
if it would work for me.
I have facter running great ( gives all the system information / platform
etc etc ). Now the problem I see is if I use the github clone and try to
run anything I get
puppet/bin/puppet:3
HI all,
I have factor working ( gives good results ) .. is there a Windows
branch in github? cause right now the Wiki and clone does not match.
Any information would be appreciated
Thanks in Advance.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" g
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:04 AM, CraftyTech wrote:
[snip]
> Why am I getting exported resource conflict? fqdn is unique to each
> host, so there are no duplicates...
Are you absolutely sure? What host is complaining about the duplicate?
Do you have any "plain" host type declarations outside of
Nigel Sollars wrote:
HI all,
I have factor working ( gives good results ) .. is there a Windows
branch in github? cause right now the Wiki and clone does not match.
Any information would be appreciated
Thanks in Advance.
Nigel
Which wiki page and which clone?
Regards
James Turnbull
--
Y
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:35 AM, FreddieB wrote:
[snip[
>> debug: OpenSSL: Error(9): certificate is not yet valid
>> debug: OpenSSL: Cert: /CN=deploy01
>> /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/network/http_pool.rb:68:
>> [BUG] Bus Error
>> ruby 1.8.7 (2009-12-24 patchlevel 248) [amd64-freebsd8]
Hello Jeff,
This is the "only" class(s) I'm running on this host:
class basics{
include basics::collect
@@host { "$fqdn": ip => $ipaddress, host_aliases => $hostname,
tag => "${application}"}
class basics::collect {
require basics
Host<<| tag == "${application}" |>>
Hi
This Wiki:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Puppet_Windows
and the clone of puppet from there, trying ti run anything from in here
brings require errors and such puppet/util/command_line and
puppet/application/agent.
perhaps I missed something ( open to idea's )
Regards
Nige
Nigel Sollars wrote:
Hi
This Wiki:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Puppet_Windows
and the clone of puppet from there, trying ti run anything from in here
brings require errors and such puppet/util/command_line and
puppet/application/agent.
perhaps I missed something ( open to
Ok cool, I have the puppet gem installed already but have found issues and
was not 100% that was the right course of action.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
> Nigel Sollars wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> This Wiki:
>>
>> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Puppet_Windo
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:17 AM, CraftyTech wrote:
[snip]
> This is what the host file looks like:
> # HEADER: This file was autogenerated at Tue Sep 21 12:51:18 -0400
> 2010
> # HEADER: by puppet. While it can still be managed manually, it
> # HEADER: is definitely not recommended.
> 127.0.0.1
client ~ $ facter fqdn; facter hostname; facter ipaddress
client.dev.domain.com
client
172.20.19.191
server ad # facter fqdn; facter hostname; facter ipaddress
server.dev.domain.com
server
172.17.19.175
also very strange.. the collection goes through twice ! Even thought I
have it setup once..
i
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:54 AM, CraftyTech wrote:
[snip]
> also very strange.. the collection goes through twice ! Even thought I
> have it setup once..
> i.e,
> debug: Scope(Class[basics]): Collected 2 Host resources in 0.01
> seconds
> debug: Scope(Class[basics]): Collected 0 Host resources in
I see from my ticket that my issue is a replication of a previous bug
logged. Is this one likely to be fixed by the next release / any idea (
vague eta is good ) on when this one would be released around?.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Nigel Sollars wrote:
> Ok cool, I have the puppet gem i
Splendid!
The time was off by months. Apparently FreeBSD's ntpd doesn't handle
this to well (it just quits) so an initial "ntpdate -b" got it back on
track, and after that both nptd and puppet works fine.
I think this i a trap easy to fall in to, so I'll make a suggestion to
the developers to add
Hi,
Suppose I have 3 nodes, and I want puppet to perform a set of steps on
them in a different order:
Apply step A on each of them, then step B on each of them, then step C
on each of them, and so on.
I'm wondering if puppet supports this scenario. Thanks.
--
You received this message because yo
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:49 PM, 2ead3bcd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose I have 3 nodes, and I want puppet to perform a set of steps on
> them in a different order:
> Apply step A on each of them, then step B on each of them, then step C
> on each of them, and so on.
> I'm wondering if puppet supports
I'm seeing this sporadically. What does it mean?
Sep 21 14:48:35 solr01 puppet-agent[3423]:
(/Stage[main]/Openldap::Client/File[/etc/pam.d/sudo]) Could not evaluate:
certificate verify failed Could not retrieve file metadata for
puppet:///modules/openldap/client/etc/pam.d/sudo: certificate verify
Hi all
I started researching on puppet and decided I'll try it out on Vmware
Workstation using Ubuntu 10.04. So I'm trying to do the simplest
puppet install pattern as outlined in
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Simplest_Puppet_Install_Pattern.
For now, I'm trying to test puppe
> Suppose I have 3 nodes, and I want puppet to perform a set of steps on
> them in a different order:
> Apply step A on each of them, then step B on each of them, then step C
> on each of them, and so on.
> I'm wondering if puppet supports this scenario. Thanks.
In other words, you want to guarant
Hi all
Just after Puppet Camp we're holding a Puppet developer training. If
you want to extend, hack on or customize Puppet or write your own facts,
types/providers or reports this is the place to learn how to do that.
The details are:
Rare Puppet Master Developer training (only held 1-2 times a
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:52:23 -0700, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
> I'm seeing this sporadically. What does it mean?
>
> Sep 21 14:48:35 solr01 puppet-agent[3423]:
> (/Stage[main]/Openldap::Client/File[/etc/pam.d/sudo]) Could not evaluate:
> certificate verify failed Could not retrieve file metadata f
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:02 PM, James Cammarata wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:52:23 -0700, Douglas Garstang
> wrote:
> > I'm seeing this sporadically. What does it mean?
> >
> > Sep 21 14:48:35 solr01 puppet-agent[3423]:
> > (/Stage[main]/Openldap::Client/File[/etc/pam.d/sudo]) Could not ev
Nigel Sollars wrote:
> I see from my ticket that my issue is a replication of a previous bug
> logged. Is this one likely to be fixed by the next release / any idea (
> vague eta is good ) on when this one would be released around?.
It's targeted for 2.6.2 - which is the next maintenance release
Kikanny wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I started researching on puppet and decided I'll try it out on Vmware
> Workstation using Ubuntu 10.04. So I'm trying to do the simplest
> puppet install pattern as outlined in
> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Simplest_Puppet_Install_Pattern.
> For
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:49 PM, 2ead3bcd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose I have 3 nodes, and I want puppet to perform a set of steps on
> them in a different order:
> Apply step A on each of them, then step B on each of them, then step C
> on each of them, and so on.
> I'm wondering if puppet supports
On Sep 21, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Kikanny wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I started researching on puppet and decided I'll try it out on Vmware
> Workstation using Ubuntu 10.04. So I'm trying to do the simplest
> puppet install pattern as outlined in
> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Simples
Hi All
I am looking to report on all servers that are "Out of sync".
Currently we run puppet in noop mode hourly, and so we get reports saying
there are X resources Out of sync.
Unfortunately, because it is a noop, puppet reports those X resources out of
date as successfully applied, which makes
32 matches
Mail list logo
