Hey guys! I have hundreds of freebsd servers to manage, so i try to
deploy puppet on my servers. The version of puppet client i used is
0.25.4 , while puppetmaster uses the same version , which is a debian
system. The problems i encountered are as follows:
1. when i run "puppetd -t -d " on c
Now that cucumber-puppet is a Puppet Labs project, I guess it is time
to email questions about it here ;)
I'm in the process of adding RoR environment support into my module
tree, so instead of just having a single location for all modules, I
now have several environments. Logically to test my dif
Hi,
I'm using custom providers for installing pear and pecl package. But every time
I ran puppetd --test,
it says that pear provider is not recognized.
But when I remove the custom providers from /var/lib/puppet/lib/puppet/provider
(client server),
and ran puppetd --test once more, it downloa
Hi Oliver, try:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Using_Multiple_Environments
On Sep 14, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Oliver wrote:
> Now that cucumber-puppet is a Puppet Labs project, I guess it is time
> to email questions about it here ;)
>
> I'm in the process of adding RoR environment
Hi all,
I've been to a few conferences where puppet has been presented, but
would love to know if there's a more puppet specific meet-up planned
in the UK any time soon?
t.i.a.
Joel
--
$ echo "kpfmAdpoofdufevq/dp/vl" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'
--
You received this message because yo
- "Joel Merrick" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been to a few conferences where puppet has been presented, but
> would love to know if there's a more puppet specific meet-up planned
> in the UK any time soon?
Not that I am aware of, we have a london devops group (londondevops.org) that
meet re
On 14 September 2010 14:09, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
> - "Joel Merrick" wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been to a few conferences where puppet has been presented, but
>> would love to know if there's a more puppet specific meet-up planned
>> in the UK any time soon?
>
> Not that I am aware of, we
- "Gary Law" wrote:
> On 14 September 2010 14:09, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
> >
> > - "Joel Merrick" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've been to a few conferences where puppet has been presented,
> but
> >> would love to know if there's a more puppet specific meet-up
> planned
> >> in the
Alternatively you could just use a template /etc/system where you put most of
the logic into the ERB by putting if defined entries in.
--
Derek Yarnell
On Sep 14, 2010, at 1:25 AM, John Warburton wrote:
> I may not go down that path, but you've triggered something in my head - why
> don't I u
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:34:00AM -0400, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> Hi Oliver, try:
>
> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Using_Multiple_Environments
I've never been fond of the way RoR treats environments (or, at least,
the way RoR developers treat them). The thing I really don't like
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
> In the long Puppet tradition of fast releases and agile iteration comes
> the 2.6.1 release!
>
> 2.6.1 is a maintenance release in the 2.6.x branch.
>
> It contains a number of functional and performance enhancements
> including preliminary
On 09/14/2010 03:25 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
Doubt there's enough traction here for too focused events :(
A Europe-based Puppet Camp would probably go over well ; i mean, us
Europeans use Puppet, too. :)
--
Daniel Maher
"The Internet is completely over." -- Prince
--
You received this mess
- "Daniel Maher" wrote:
> On 09/14/2010 03:25 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
> > Doubt there's enough traction here for too focused events :(
>
> A Europe-based Puppet Camp would probably go over well ; i mean, us
> Europeans use Puppet, too. :)
Yeah the one held this may did go down well :P
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:34:00AM -0400, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>> Hi Oliver, try:
>>
>> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Using_Multiple_Environments
>
> I've never been fond of the way RoR treats environments (or, at least,
>
well
I upgraded to 2.6.1 and it works.. changed nothing!!
But thanks for the help and your time Nan!!
--
-ls
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscr
Hello
I just upgraded to 2.6.1 and now when I create a new account I can no longer
add the encrypted password added...
the message i see is
Provider useradd does not support features manages_passwords; not managing
attribute password
I presume I need to add something to tell the primitive 'use
Is there any built-in method for puppet to update its own configs and then
restart a puppetd run should they change? One of the (few) features of
cfengine I always liked was that you had your emergency configs, which
allowed you to update your primary cfengine configs even if you made a
mistake th
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:07 AM, James Cammarata wrote:
>
> Is there any built-in method for puppet to update its own configs and then
> restart a puppetd run should they change? One of the (few) features of
> cfengine I always liked was that you had your emergency configs, which
> allowed you to
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Maher wrote:
> On 09/14/2010 03:25 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>> Doubt there's enough traction here for too focused events :(
>
> A Europe-based Puppet Camp would probably go over well ; i mean, us
> Europeans use Puppet, too. :)
>
>
+1 !
As much as I'd love
Disconnect wrote:
The release candidate is available for download at:
http://puppetlabs.com/downloads/puppet/puppet-2.6.1.tar.gz
I take it you mean 'release', right? :)
Yes - that should be release.
Regards
James Turnbull
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
> We manage puppet.conf as a template.
>
> I've often wanted something similar to your feature request, where you
> could signify in a puppet manifest that the whole run should simply
> restart at that point. You should file it :)
>
> Have you thought about maybe using the pre-run hook? We use
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:24 AM, James Cammarata wrote:
>
>> We manage puppet.conf as a template.
>>
>> I've often wanted something similar to your feature request, where you
>> could signify in a puppet manifest that the whole run should simply
>> restart at that point. You should file it :)
>>
Joel Merrick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Maher wrote:
On 09/14/2010 03:25 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
Doubt there's enough traction here for too focused events :(
A Europe-based Puppet Camp would probably go over well ; i mean, us
Europeans use Puppet, too. :)
Luc Suryo wrote:
Hello
I just upgraded to 2.6.1 and now when I create a new account I can no
longer
add the encrypted password added...
the message i see is
Provider useradd does not support features manages_passwords; not
managing attribute password
I presume I need to add something to
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:19:24 +0200, Kenneth Holter wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
>
> Is it possible at the moment to set up access control for Puppet Dashboard?
> As of now anyone within our organization will have full access to the
> dashboard. I thought I'd set up regular Apache access control, but
I'm trying to use puppet with passenger as well. I'm running puppet 2.6.1
and I'm running into the issue mentioned under the troubleshooting section
of http://projects.reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Using_Passenger.
The instructions there are very vague. I've tried adding the ca_name
sett
James
its a CentOS 5.5. box, and it worked before I installed 2.6.1 this morning.
Do I need to add manages_passwords = true maybe?
thanks
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:34 AM, James Turnbull wrote:
> Luc Suryo wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I just upgraded to 2.6.1 and now when I create a new account I ca
Luc Suryo wrote:
James
its a CentOS 5.5. box, and it worked before I installed 2.6.1 this
morning.
Do I need to add manages_passwords = true maybe?
No - that will have no impact.
Can you confirm you have libshadow installed?
If you do it's a bug and can you please log it.
Regards
Jam
Hmm very odd and yes your are correct somehow ruby-shadow was removed...
I added it back and it works again.. not a bug.. sorry and thanks
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:45 AM, James Turnbull wrote:
>
>
> Luc Suryo wrote:
>
>> James
>>
>> its a CentOS 5.5. box, and it worked before I installed 2.6.1 t
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Jacob Helwig wrote:
> As far as getting access control right now, it's pretty much what you
> mentioned: Putting Dashboard behind something like Apache access
> controls. You should still be able to use the dashboard as an external
> node tool, but I'd imagine th
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM, M C wrote:
> I'm trying to use puppet with passenger as well. I'm running puppet 2.6.1
> and I'm running into the issue mentioned under the troubleshooting section
> of http://projects.reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Using_Passenger.
> The instructions the
Nan,
The puppet master is running on a machine called admin. We have a cname
that resolves puppet.bar.com to admin.baz.bar.com. I've checked the
certificate and it shows the following:
Subject: CN=admin.baz.bar.com
X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
DNS:puppet, DNS:admin.baz.bar.com, DNS:puppet.
I do have a really strange issue with exec a tar command with puppet
2.6.0. If I run it with puppetmasterd I get the following error
message:
(//my.domain.net//Stage[main]/Workerzone/Build::Install[top]/
Exec[extract-top]/returns) change from notrun to 0 failed: /bin/bash -
c '/usr/sbin/tar -xzvf
If I have...
$version_core = "t.1538-1"
$is_trunk_release = regsubst($version_core, '^(.*?)\.(.*?)$', '\1')
if $is_trunk_release == "t" {
notice ("here 1")
if $t >= 1583 {
notice ("here 2")
}
}
Puppet complains with:
comparison of String with 15
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
> If I have...
>
> $version_core = "t.1538-1"
> $is_trunk_release = regsubst($version_core, '^(.*?)\.(.*?)$', '\1')
> if $is_trunk_release == "t" {
> notice ("here 1")
> if $t >= 1583 {
> notice ("here 2")
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
> If I have...
>
> $version_core = "t.1538-1"
> $is_trunk_release = regsubst($version_core, '^(.*?)\.(.*?)$', '\1')
> if $is_trunk_release == "t" {
> notice ("here 1")
> if $t >= 1583 {
> notice ("here 2")
Yes, this does the trick. Thanks!
Erik
On Sep 13, 12:55 pm, Stefan Schulte
wrote:
> Put your provider in /etc/puppet/modules/mymodule/lib/
> puppet/provider/package/myprovider.rb
>
> Notice the provider/TYPE subfolder
>
> Hope this does the trick
>
> -Stefan
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:52:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Douglas Garstang
> wrote:
>> If I have...
>>
>> $version_core = "t.1538-1"
>> $is_trunk_release = regsubst($version_core, '^(.*?)\.(.*?)$', '\1')
>> if $is_trunk_release == "t" {
>> notic
Hello All,
I've been battling with issue all day to no avail. I'm exporting
all host entries this way:
class basics::host_export { @@host{ "$fqdn":
ip => $ipaddress,
host_aliases => $hostname,
tag => $group
Hi all
Many of you know we renamed ourselves from Reductive Labs to Puppet
Labs. We've slowly been removing the remnants of the old company name
from various places.
As part of this exercise we're also migrating our GitHub accounts.
We've set-up a new puppetlabs GitHub account and forked all ou
btw: I'm running puppet 0.25.5
On Sep 14, 3:53 pm, CraftyTech wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've been battling with issue all day to no avail. I'm exporting
> all host entries this way:
> class basics::host_export { @@host{ "$fqdn":
> ip => $ipaddress,
>
This is weird. I'm noticing that with 2.6rcx that puppet isn't running
on the nodes every 30 minutes. In fact, not even every few hours. Was
the default changed to some huge value in 2.6? I don't see errors in
the logs... I don't even see puppet starting a run.
Doug
--
You received this message
I've been banging my head on this all day, and I cannot seem to figure
out how to do it.
I have a package for Apache HTTPd. I want to be able to specify the
exact version of the package to use for a particular installation. And
it is also possible that I want to have two separate modules inst
Minor buglet: the *.spec file for linux needs to be updated for
2.6.1.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-use
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
> This is weird. I'm noticing that with 2.6rcx that puppet isn't running
> on the nodes every 30 minutes. In fact, not even every few hours. Was
> the default changed to some huge value in 2.6? I don't see errors in
> the logs... I don't eve
On 14.09.2010 23:12, Marc Zampetti wrote:
I've been banging my head on this all day, and I cannot seem to
figure out how to do it.
I have a package for Apache HTTPd. I want to be able to specify the
exact version of the package to use for a particular installation. And
it is also possible t
Check you environment path variable. Tar might not find something,
most probably, the gzip executable (not 100% sure on this part). Usually
if something doesn't work in specific cases, but it works in you bash
console, you can make a safe bet on environment variables and/or running
user.
Si
Basically, I'm trying to build modules that implement best practices
(the app-apache module), and then admins that need to build specific
apache instances just create a new module that inherits from the base
class and provides the information they need.
So, admin A wants to build apache serve
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM, M C wrote:
> Restarting the puppet master with the certdnsname option set did not change
> the certificate in /var/lib/puppet/ssl/certs/admin.baz.bar.com at all.
>
> My understanding from the documentation is that the issue was with ca.pem.
If that's the case,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Marc Zampetti wrote:
> I've been banging my head on this all day, and I cannot seem to figure out
> how to do it.
>
> I have a package for Apache HTTPd. I want to be able to specify the exact
> version of the package to use for a particular installation. And it is
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Marc Zampetti
> wrote:
>> I've been banging my head on this all day, and I cannot seem to figure out
>> how to do it.
>>
>> I have a package for Apache HTTPd. I want to be able to specify the exact
>> ve
Skipping the practices part, you can achieve the final objective by
adding another level of inheritance (apache-app-ver-2) and the two
classes in the end would inherit from, or include, this new class.
Logically if there is any reason for apache having the same version in
both application
I do this kind of thing in a few places, for things like different
or specific versions of mysql, tomcat, libraries, and so on. I use
a define to wrap this up, and the declare is called from within the
node defitions. A simplified example of our method:
define install ($version) {
package
Forrie wrote:
> Minor buglet: the *.spec file for linux needs to be updated for
> 2.6.1.
>
This is usually done by the packagers at some point. We only maintain
these specs for convenience.
Regards
James Turnbull
--
Puppet Labs - http://www.puppetlabs.com
C: 503-734-8571
--
You received t
On 09/14/2010 01:00 AM, daniel wrote:
>Hey guys! I have hundreds of freebsd servers to manage, so i try to
> deploy puppet on my servers. The version of puppet client i used is
> 0.25.4 , while puppetmaster uses the same version , which is a debian
> system. The problems i encountered are as
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
> Forrie wrote:
>> Minor buglet: the *.spec file for linux needs to be updated for
>> 2.6.1.
>>
>
> This is usually done by the packagers at some point. We only maintain
> these specs for convenience.
It seems like an inconvenience in it's
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
>> Forrie wrote:
>>> Minor buglet: the *.spec file for linux needs to be updated for
>>> 2.6.1.
>>>
>>
>> This is usually done by the packagers at some point. We only maintain
>> th
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Douglas Garstang
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
>>> Forrie wrote:
Minor buglet: the *.spec file for linux needs to be updated for
2.6.1.
>>>
>>> This is us
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Douglas Garstang
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, James Turnbull
>>> wrote:
Forrie wrote:
> Minor buglet: the *.spec file
We're pleased to announce the availability of Puppet Dashboard 1.0.4rc1!
The 1.0.4 release is a maintenance release, it fixes a number of bugs
and significantly improves performance.
Please try this release candidate and let us know about any issues on
the mailing list (http://groups.google.com/g
Has anyone used this feature?
On Sep 14, 4:08 pm, CraftyTech wrote:
> btw: I'm running puppet 0.25.5
>
> On Sep 14, 3:53 pm, CraftyTech wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello All,
>
> > I've been battling with issue all day to no avail. I'm exporting
> > all host entries this way:
> > class basics::host_e
Thanks for your tip! Path is set early in base inheritance class to:
Exec { path => "/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/
sbin:/sbin" }
But even if I set this path env var in the exec block it fails:
# here I always get an error
exec { "extract-$name":
cwd => "/usr/loca
62 matches
Mail list logo
