After upgrading to 0.1-4, I ran into the same problem. *"Failed to enable
hostname_here for installation"*
*
*
But, this time around, I don't see any messages/logs regarding the error.
Link gets created in the TFTP directory, but nothing else. I have gone
through the change log, I even tried chang
Offhand, does anyone know the difference between the 2
constructs below to manage secondary groups ?
This is the 'groupadd' provider I think (CentOS).
Think I'd prefer the former if the result is the same
(I create these users in a definition and it's simpler to not touch it).
group { "foo":
Hi,
I would assume that you cant execute puppetca (e.g. sudo permissions etc),
can you double check if there is nothing in the log files?
probably its best to continue this discussion at foreman users or
#theforeman on irc.
cheers,
Ohad
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:51 PM, LOhit wrote:
> After up
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:31:54AM +, Dick Davies wrote:
> Offhand, does anyone know the difference between the 2
> constructs below to manage secondary groups ?
> This is the 'groupadd' provider I think (CentOS).
> Think I'd prefer the former if the result is the same
The result will be the
Hello James,
Am Friday 12 March 2010 21:49:02 schrieb James Turnbull:
> > the reason for ignoring the different manifests was a setting
> > in /etc/sysconfig/puppetmaster. The settings name is
> > "PUPPETMASTER_MANIFEST" and was set to my "production" site.pp. Because
> > of my switch back to webb
Hi,
Sure, we can take it up on the irc channel. However, just for the record,
sudo permission is fine, it was a working setup prior to upgrade. And the
user the foreman runs as, can execute "puppetca", I tested it from the
command line to make sure.
Best regards,
-LOhit
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at
As we're pondering future enhancements to facter, it seems useful to
better understand things (other than Puppet) that are using facter.
Do you have a script/application that shells out to facter or uses it
from as a Ruby library to collect information? (I'm aware of
mcollective supporting facte
> that are very much procedural while Puppet manifest are more
> useful on a description of required software level.
Sort of.
The long story is that we don't have a really native feeling way to
model multinode deployments and workflow now, but we can think of
modeling it based on a set of checkpo
sorry for the late reply :)
but yes, I have switched to passenger.
Gus
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Chris Westin wrote:
>
> I'm getting similar messages about cacrl, even though I haven't set
> it. Did switching to passenger fix the problem? Or did you find
> another way to fix it?
>
> I
Yea right now I am not using environments, I would like to move to either
passenger or mongrel for a more scalable setup (although I have heard
mongrel has issue with memory leaks).
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Christopher Johnston
> w
I will keep that in mind, ideally I would like to keep SSL in place for
security purposes I was really looking for a quick hack/slash to disable SSL
for the time being just to get past some auth issues.
Longer term though from a scalability POV, I will in the end have over 24-30
puppetmasters acro
ssl has nothing to do with mongrel or passenger, as ssl is handled in apache
(or ngnix).
as far as it goes for SSL, you have two options:
1. a single CA
2. CA chain hierarchy.
the first option is simple, one of your puppetmasters will be your CA, and
every sign will run on it, you would require i
On 12.03.2010 22:34, Nigel Kersten wrote:
For those people following along at home on this issue, Lucas Nussbaum
chased it up on behalf of Debian and has just gotten a patch uploaded
to Debian that resolves this problem.
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2739
Kudos for Lucas and tha
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:11:26 +0100
Peter Meier wrote:
> have a look at the replace option of the file resource:
> http://docs.reductivelabs.com/references/stable/type.html#file
I've done similar things with custom facts sent from the client at
system build time. i.e. during the initial puppet
All I want to say is thanks, I found Trac and its searching to be such a
PITA.
This was such a pleasant surprise :)
--
---
Derek T. Yarnell
University of Maryland
Institute for Advanced Computer Studies
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Users
We keep getting a variety of these from a random set during each Puppet run:
Sat Mar 13 23:46:42 -0500 2010 //cups/File[/etc/cups] (err): Failed to
generate additional resources using 'eval_generate': end of file
reached
It seems like there is a 30% chance of a host providing this on any
given ma
I nearly forgot to write in that we removed the puppet client (EPEL)
and reinstalled, and the --verbose went away. We never did figure out
where it was coming from, though. Thanks for everyone's help.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Kent Rankin wrote:
>> [r...@ ~]#
'lo,
- "Michael DeHaan" wrote:
> Do you have a script/application that shells out to facter or uses it
> from as a Ruby library to collect information? (I'm aware of
> mcollective supporting facter, but that's about it).
my biggest hassle with it is that it's quite slow. Though I guess t
On 15 March 2010 17:26, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
> 'lo,
>
> - "Michael DeHaan" wrote:
>
>> Do you have a script/application that shells out to facter or uses it
>> from as a Ruby library to collect information? (I'm aware of
>> mcollective supporting facter, but that's about it).
>
> my biggest h
> Yeah that's certainly one of the things I want to do, as is if we're
> calling out to a command to parse it and can cache/process it in one
> time as opposed to calling a billion ifconfig/dmidecodes that'd be
> good too.
Yep, if you're shelling out or executing 'puppet' without the daemon,
in me
On Mar 15, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:
> ssl has nothing to do with mongrel or passenger, as ssl is handled in apache
> (or ngnix).
>
> as far as it goes for SSL, you have two options:
> 1. a single CA
> 2. CA chain hierarchy.
>
> the first option is simple, one of your puppetmasters wi
We updated our server last week to 25.4 and have updated a few clients.
I've got one now that is irritated:
info: Caching catalog for
/usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/yaml/rubytypes.rb:315: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.1 (2003-12-25) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
Any thoughts?
--
You received this message becaus
Len Rugen wrote:
> We updated our server last week to 25.4 and have updated a few clients.
> I've got one now that is irritated:
>
> info: Caching catalog for
> /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/yaml/rubytypes.rb:315: [BUG] Segmentation fault
> ruby 1.8.1 (2003-12-25) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
>
> Any thoughts?
Yuck.
Who tests on old rhel4 systems :-)
Thanks
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Len Rugen wrote:
> > We updated our server last week to 25.4 and have updated a few clients.
> > I've got one now that is irritated:
> >
> > info: Caching catalog for
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/yam
Hi Everyone,
I'm curious to see how many people are running puppetmasterd on OS X
Server. I'm trying to cement a recipe for my puppetmasters (10.5 Servers), and
I'm finding that many modules port over well but certain things fall short due
to the Mac's package providers.
Visiti
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Gary Larizza Jr. wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> I'm curious to see how many people are running puppetmasterd on OS X Server.
> I'm trying to cement a recipe for my puppetmasters (10.5 Servers), and I'm
> finding that many modules port over well but certain things fall sh
Will the fix be on the client or server side?
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Len Rugen wrote:
> Who tests on old rhel4 systems :-)
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> Len Rugen wrote:
>> > We updated our server last week to 25.4 and have updated a few
I think this might be a ruby problem due to that being such an ancient
version. There are Centos 4 packages for ruby 1.8.5 which might help.
$ ls /var/www/cobbler/localmirror/ruby/
ruby-1.8.5-5.el4.centos.1.i386.rpm
ruby-mode-1.8.5-5.el4.centos.1.i386.rpm
ruby-irb-1.8.5-5.el4.centos.1.i38
On Mar 15, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> We always create our own pkg installs. It's well worth it.
>
> Have you look at Luggage Gary? It's the open source project for our
> internal tool we use for Makefiles to build packages.
>
> http://luggage.apesseekingknowledge.net/
I've defin
I only had ruby, ruby-dev & ruby-libs, after installing those, pupport works
except it seems to have lost the ruby-shadow function:
info: /User[root]: Provider useradd does not support features
manages_passwords; not managing attribute password
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Trevor Hemsley wro
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Puppet_Red_Hat_Centos
Len Rugen wrote:
I only had ruby, ruby-dev & ruby-libs, after installing those, pupport
works except it seems to have lost the ruby-shadow function:
info: /User[root]: Provider useradd does not support features
manag
Yes, I am aware that by going with mongrel/passenger as it will be handled
by mod_ssl. I setup mongrel in my lab today, didn't take much to get going
(puppet wiki was VERY helpful). Unfortunately passenger doesn't look to be
packaged up other then in a gem (didn't investigate further then a quick
If you're using Red Hat/Fedora flavors of Linux, you can use Kanarip's
Repository to get mod_passenger and other rubygem rpm repackagings -
http://www.kanarip.com/custom/
On 3/15/10 6:14 PM, Christopher Johnston wrote:
Yes, I am aware that by going with mongrel/passenger as it will be
handled
this breaks because puppet still uses YAML for the local catalog cache.
the best way to solve it now is by upgrading your ruby (or installing a
newer ruby next to the old one).
I do it for RHE3 machines, seems like it also must be done for RHEL4 as its
seems low prio for RL.
cheers,
Ohad
On Tue
hello,guys
is there any body com from china ? i had just start a
chinese wiki for puppet. http://puppet.wikidot.com.
如果有兴趣,可以一起把wiki做起来,把puppet推荐给更多的中国的系统管理员.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, se
Hi everybody,
I just want to know what is the best web server between passenger and
mongrel.
I don't understand what are the benefits of each solution.
Do you have a part of the answer please?
Regards.
Grifith
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppe
36 matches
Mail list logo
