Re: [Puppet Users] Strange messages on 0.25.4.

2010-02-19 Thread Peter Meier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi > 2.When I ran puppetrun, Puppetmasterd showed message below. > Feb 19 11:04:23 puppetmasterd puppetmasterd[739]: [ID 702911 > daemon.warning] Host is missing hostname and/or domain: puppetd > > Every execution of puppetrun, Puppetmasterd showed

[Puppet Users] Puppet mounts CIFS file system every run

2010-02-19 Thread Kenneth Holter
Hi. I'm using the mount resource type to mount a CIFS file system. This is my configuration: -- code -- file {"/mnt/remote_file_system": ensure => directory } mount { "/mnt/remote_file_system/": device => "//$shares_server/share", fstype => cifs, ensure => mounted, remounts =>

Re: [Puppet Users] Rebuilding machines from foreman

2010-02-19 Thread Ohad Levy
the real error message is generated here: http://theforeman.org/repositories/entry/foreman/vendor/plugins/proxy/lib/proxy.rb#L80 which basically tests if the ca directory is available and puppetca can be found. I'm guessing one of these two are missing (or in a non standard location). cheers, Oha

Re: [Puppet Users] Rebuilding machines from foreman

2010-02-19 Thread LOhit
Hi Ohad, You are a genius..!!! I owe you a beer. :) My SSL directory is "/etc/puppet/ssl". I wasted one whole day trying to figure it out. Thanks a bunch. On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Ohad Levy wrote: > the real error message is generated here: > http://theforeman.org/repositories/entry/fo

[Puppet Users] Questions about the module areas "client" and "services"

2010-02-19 Thread Kenneth Holter
Hello all. I'm a little confused about the purpose of the modules defined under /services and /clients, as outlined in the Puppet best practice document. If I understand correctly these modules are meant for collecting general modules (found in /modules) to make up a infratructure services such a

[Puppet Users] Advanced templating for dummies

2010-02-19 Thread Dan
Forgive my ignorance, but puppet and ruby are both very new to me. I am trying to use puppet for (amongst other things) manage a custom backup script i use on all my machines. The script reads a configuration file that tells it where to backup from and to. Every machine is different, some only bac

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Israeli Puppet meetup?

2010-02-19 Thread Ohad Levy
Hi, Lets meet this Sunday 20:00 at the temple bar at the cinema city - http://www.rest.co.il/sites/Default.asp?txtRestID=5290&txtSR=1 See you there! Ohad On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Moty wrote: > > Count me in too > > > On Feb 10, 9:42 am, Ohad Levy wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > > > Won

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Israeli Puppet meetup?

2010-02-19 Thread юрка олейников
agreed 2010/2/19 Ohad Levy > Hi, > > Lets meet this Sunday 20:00 at the temple bar at the cinema city - > http://www.rest.co.il/sites/Default.asp?txtRestID=5290&txtSR=1 > > See you there! > Ohad > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Moty wrote: > >> >> Count me in too >> >> >> On Feb 10, 9

[Puppet Users] Value of 'preferred_serialization_format' (pson) is invalid for report, using default (b64_zlib_yaml)

2010-02-19 Thread Clif Smith
Should I be concerned of the following error? - Value of 'preferred_serialization_format' (pson) is invalid for report, using default (b64_zlib_yaml) I'm running 0.25.4 on both server and clients and all are running Red Hat 5.4. Thanks, Clif -- You received this message because you are subscr

Re: [Puppet Users] Value of 'preferred_serialization_format' (pson) is invalid for report, using default (b64_zlib_yaml)

2010-02-19 Thread Peter Meier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Should I be concerned of the following error? > - Value of 'preferred_serialization_format' (pson) is invalid for > report, using default (b64_zlib_yaml) it's a warning not an error and there is open ticket for that. so no it should go away with o

Re: [Puppet Users] Augeas pam.d argument checking

2010-02-19 Thread David Lutterkort
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 18:33 -0500, Joe McDonagh wrote: > I created a ticket about a pam type nearly a year ago and hopefully I > can have a working type with the parsedfile provider sometime within the > next week (I should have a real-live day off Friday). I did do some > planning for type feat