On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 18:33 -0500, Joe McDonagh wrote: > I created a ticket about a pam type nearly a year ago and hopefully I > can have a working type with the parsedfile provider sometime within the > next week (I should have a real-live day off Friday). I did do some > planning for type features while on a plane ride but ended up falling > asleep... so that's as far as I am right now. I'll post to the list once > I have something that resembles a working pam type.
Have you thought about doing this based on Augeas rather than ParsedFile ? Depending on what exactly you want your type to do, you might even be able to write it as a 'define' in puppet, rather than having to drop to Ruby. If the logic in your type is complex enough, though, and you have to write it in Ruby, you can still use Augeas to access, query and modify the pam entries. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
