Hi all!
I have quation: how i may use nested variables/facts? For example, I
have variable $iface. It's variable declared in node brakets, and, use
with defenition. iface may be eth0, eth1(Linux), em0, ...
, ...
is fact:
facter | grep eth0 | grep mac
macaddress_eth0 => 54:52:00:3D:CB:40
We don'
I try to edit file app/views/hosts/_rrdreport.rhtml
<%= host.name %> Last puppet report on <%=
host.last_report.getlocal %>, which is <%= time_ago_in_words
(host.last_report) %> ago
<% url = "http://srv2-puppet:3000/#{SETTINGS
[:rrd_report_url]}/#{host.name}" -%>
Daily
>
>
weekly
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wouldn't this possibly have unintended consequences, or would the scope
of the overrides be restricted to the define in this case?
Trevor
On 12/22/2009 08:14 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
> hello,
>
> You can use the ability to set defaults for resources:
Have a look at the generate() and inline_template() functions, one of
which should provide you with a workaround to your problem. There may
be a more elegant solution though.
On 24 Dec 2009, at 09:33, sHaggY_caT wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have quation: how i may use nested variables/facts? For e
On 12/24/2009 5:16 AM, koliama wrote:
> I try to edit file app/views/hosts/_rrdreport.rhtml
>
> <%= host.name %> Last puppet report on<%=
> host.last_report.getlocal %>, which is<%= time_ago_in_words
> (host.last_report) %> ago
>
><% url = "http://srv2-puppet:3000/#{SETTINGS
> [:rrd_report_u
> Wouldn't this possibly have unintended consequences, or would the scope
> of the overrides be restricted to the define in this case?
afair it's restricted to the scope.
cheers pete
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to
I am trying to use the package class to manage a gem and I need to
specify the source. I tried doing the following:
package { "gateway_install_support":
ensure => installed,
provider => gem,
source => "http://gems.ublip.com:8808";,
require => Exec["ruby setup.rb"]
}
but this cau
