A stock Solaris 10 syslog logs to /var/adm/messages.
Cheers Robert
On Nov 8, 3:01 pm, Erlend Leganger wrote:
> I set up puppet for the first time yesterday, on two Solaris 10
> machines, each running puppet v0.24.7. I made a modified version of
> the initial manifest described
> inhttp://reduc
Isaac Christoffersen schrieb:
> to validate the server configuration. The combination of TDD and BDD
> with server rollouts is very attractive.
I think the whole topic is really hot. :-)
It would probably a good idea to expand what the difference between TDD
and BDD in systems management actua
My understanding is that Test Driven Development hit the mainstream
(did smalltalk have a unit test framework?) with JUnit.[1] Junit
allowed developers to automate their unit tests. All the unit tests
for your project should run in seconds, if your codebase and tests are
loosely coupled.
e.g. t
On Nov 4, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Kenneth Holter wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I found this script to retrieve backed up puppet hosted files:
> http://markmail.org/message/nybqh3be7bcge33h
>
> ..and made some adjustsments. I've pasted the script below in case
> anyone else are in need of such a script:
>
> ---
Could it be related the files folder I have has sub directories??
drwxr-xr-x 5 puppet puppet 4096 Apr 21 2009 .
drwxr-x--- 4 puppet puppet 4096 Apr 7 2009 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Apr 7 2009 CentOS -> RedHat
drwxr-x--- 2 puppet puppet 4096 Apr 7 2009 Debian
drwxr-x--- 2 pupp
On 09/11/09 21:39, Larry Ludwig wrote:
>
> Could it be related the files folder I have has sub directories??
I don't think so.
IMHO, you should try to add some debug information to your master to see
why those requests are forbidden for you.
The code that checks if the file serving request is
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 6, 11:32 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>>> [..]
>>> I'm in the middle of testing 2.2.5 now, and hit this problem.
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/phusion-passenger
* Nigel Kersten [091109 22:22]:
>
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Nov 6, 11:32 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> >>> [..]
> >>> I'm in the middle of testing 2.2.5 now, and hit this problem.
> >
2009/11/6 Martin Englund :
>>
> It is indeed better to work on this jointly. You are much further
> along the way, so I'll clone your cucumber-nagios repository and work
> in integrating the stuff I've done into your code. You'll be hearing
> from me shortly...
So i've added some SSH steps to cuc
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
> * Nigel Kersten [091109 22:22]:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Nov 6, 11:32 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> >>> [..
So, I noticed that when adding a service to puppet, puppet is running
a chkconfig . However, as far as I can tell, puppet should be
running a chkconfig --add , otherwise the symlinks don't get
created from the service in /etc/rc.d/rc6.d back to the service in
/etc/init.d. As as a result, the servi
Hi all,
As promised in the spring[1], we're finally starting to execute on our
licensing and copyright strategy.
At this point, our plan is to convert Puppet and Facter to the Apache
license, release any further projects under the same license, and
require CLAs for any significant contribu
So, I noticed that when adding a service to puppet, puppet is running
a chkconfig . However, as far as I can tell, puppet should be
running a chkconfig --add , otherwise the symlinks don't get
created from the service in /etc/rc.d/rc6.d back to the service in
/etc/init.d. As as a result, the servi
On Nov 9, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
>
> So, I noticed that when adding a service to puppet, puppet is running
> a chkconfig . However, as far as I can tell, puppet should be
> running a chkconfig --add , otherwise the symlinks don't get
> created from the service in /etc/rc.d/rc6.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
>
> So, I noticed that when adding a service to puppet, puppet is running
> a chkconfig . However, as far as I can tell, puppet should be
> running a chkconfig --add , otherwise the symlinks don't get
> created from the service in /etc/rc.d/
Does anyone have a puppet recipe that would remove extraneous
permissions on files and directories without explicitly setting what
the permissions should be? I have an application that creates and
manipulates a bunch of temp files and directories under /tmp, and I'd
like to remove the unn
Well, that's interesting. Here's what happens WITHOUT puppet...
# Remove service jboss-tfel0.
gumby /etc/rc.d:# chkconfig --del jboss-tfel0
# No links remain.
gumby /etc/rc.d:# find . -name "*jboss-tfel0*"
./init.d/jboss-tfel0
# Add the jboss-tfel0 service.
gumby /etc/rc.d:# chkconfig --add jbo
I probably wouldn't post twice if it I wasn't waiting 4+ hours for my
posts to appear. For all I know the post disappeared. Posts not
appearing has occurred several times over the last couple of weeks.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
> On Nov 9, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Douglas Ga
Hi,
looking at the code I cant see the add, looking at the history, this was
removed at commit 83ef1b0.
based on the comments of #1219, add and remove should be done by the rpms,
while on and off should be done by puppet.
I guess that we can do chkconfig --add as it would be usually harmless and
Ohad,
Thanks for checking that. Wow, this REALLY sucks in the current
implementation then. Without the init scripts being called on
shutdown, lock files don't get cleaned up, and the services don't
start on the next boot. That's bad.
Running chkconfig on wouldn't fix the problem.
gumby /etc/rc
I guess an ugly workaround for this might be...
exec {
"chkconfig jboss-${name}":
command => "/sbin/chkconfig --add jboss-${name}",
onlyif => "! test -f /etc/rc3.d/S15jboss-${name}"
}
Service {
"foo":
requires => exec["chkconfig jboss-${name}"]
Hi Doug,
I am trying to wrap my head around this. Can I have a look at the
### BEGIN INIT INFO
section of your init script.
thanks,
Dan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To pos
Dan,
I don't think you need to see it. Take a look at this... This might
actually be a redhat bug.
Ie...
If the service isn’t registered...
gumby /etc/rc.d:# chkconfig --del jboss-tfel0
But then your an idiot and run ‘on’ without first running ‘--add’
gumby /etc/rc.d:# chkconfig jboss-tfel0 on
Dan,
And it's not just my badly written script either.
Here's what I get with an unmodified httpd startup script...
gumby /etc/rc.d:# chkconfig --del httpd
gumby /etc/rc.d:# chkconfig httpd on
gumby /etc/rc.d:# find . -name *httpd*
./rc3.d/S85httpd
./rc4.d/S85httpd
./init.d/httpd
./rc5.d/S85h
thats all clear, I see that it does not work with httpd, I wonder if it adds
it in the rpm post...
I did find one example where everything worked, this is why I was asking the
questions before. I am not sure what the difference is between these
services.
[r...@dansrh3 rc.d]# chkconfig --del yum-u
Dan,
Hmmm works for me with yum-updatesd too. Well, I'm confused. My
startup script has:
# chkconfig: 2345 15 97
ntp, which behaves the same, has:
# chkconfig: - 58 74
httpd, which also behaves the same, has:
# chkconfig: - 85 15
And, yum-updatesd, which seems to be ok, has:
# chkconfig:34
26 matches
Mail list logo
