Hi
We have on our systems old school software which is only installable
via tar. I have the tar in module/file/software.tar
How can I now access this file to untar it via an exec command. With
the file type I think it is not possible, otherwise the tar gets
downloaded every time puppet runs (bec
Hi Rene,
On 28 May 2009, at 09:20, Rene wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> We have on our systems old school software which is only installable
> via tar. I have the tar in module/file/software.tar
>
> How can I now access this file to untar it via an exec command. With
> the file type I think it is not possible
OK, I'll do that.
Thanks
On 28 Mai, 10:01, Pieter Barrezeele wrote:
> Hi Rene,
>
> On 28 May 2009, at 09:20, Rene wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi
>
> > We have on our systems old school software which is only installable
> > via tar. I have the tar in module/file/software.tar
>
> > How can I now access
Hi
> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects.
> Can't do it at
> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the
> system for this, because
> I'd like it as well...
hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a
require (or so
Hi,
I'm attempting to create a custom fact to tell me the day of the week ( to
be used as a file suffix for vmware snapshots). I've followed the wiki which
advises deploying facts via modules for releases >0.24. As I understand this
means :-
1. creating a plugins/facter directory under an exist
paul matthews wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm attempting to create a custom fact to tell me the day of the week
> ( to be used as a file suffix for vmware snapshots). I've followed the
> wiki which advises deploying facts via modules for releases >0.24. As
> I understand this means :-
>
>1. creating a p
Superb, thanks for that. I think my confusion was missing the point that you
need a specific module for facts pointed to by factpath rather than tacking
on a plugins/facter directory under an existing module
2009/5/28 Saurabh Verma
>
> paul matthews wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm attempting to create a
Hello
I have restart puppetmasterd with dbmigrate
but I still have the error : Could not store configs
May 28 14:37:18 puppetmasterd[19150]: Migrating
May 28 14:37:19 puppetmasterd[19150]: Could not store configs: undefined
method `environment=' for #
May 28 14:37:19 puppetmasterd[19150]: Com
I have recreate the DB ..
now it solved
Vincent
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Vincent Louviaux wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have restart puppetmasterd with dbmigrate
> but I still have the error : Could not store configs
>
>
> May 28 14:37:18 puppetmasterd[19150]: Migrating
> May 28 14:37:19 pupp
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote:
> Hi
>
> > Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects.
> > Can't do it at
> > class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the
> > system for this, because
> > I'd like it as well...
>
> hmm did I
Hi
> I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected:
> http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907
>
> Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch.
> I think I'll have to resubmit it.
yeah I objected because of changing the behaviour of include. B
Hi
> yeah I objected because of changing the behaviour of include. But I
> thought that it was implemented with a different keyword, which wouldn't
> change the behaviour of include.
>
> Something like a "stronger" include and I thought it have been called
> required.
>
> But maybe I'm wrong.
Thanks to Saurabh pointing me in the right direction, the solution I found
to getting basic custom facts to work were as follows:-
1. On the puppetmaster in your modules directory create a facts module with
subdirectory files. In this add any of your custom .rb scripts
# ls /etc/puppet/modules/f
Paul,
A custom fact is probably the wrong way to implement this, actually,
unless you have servers in multiple locations where the day of the
week differs from server to server.
Custom facts are intended for information that can only be computed at
the client end. For something like the day of t
I am in the Back Bay and as long as I am not too swamped I will go.
Paul Nasrat wrote:
> I'm going to be in Boston/Cambridge/Somerville at the start of June
>
> Anyone fancy meeting up for a few beers and talking about
> puppet/systems administration?
>
> Maybe somewhere like Cambridge Brewing Co
Hey, I live and work in Cambridge. Ill be there. Please let me know
when you decide on the details. Thanks.
-Tom
On May 28, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Joe McDonagh wrote:
>
> I am in the Back Bay and as long as I am not too swamped I will go.
>
> Paul Nasrat wrote:
>> I'm going to be in Boston/Cambridge
Hi,
>From initial reading Puppet looks very powerful tool, but I am looking
for a solution that support multiple OS including windows. Why can't I
use Puppet for Windows ? (Couldn't I simply run JRuby?)
Thanks in advance for your response!
Regards,
--~--~-~--~~~-
> From initial reading Puppet looks very powerful tool, but I am looking
> for a solution that support multiple OS including windows. Why can't I
> use Puppet for Windows ? (Couldn't I simply run JRuby?)
It's feasible just not yet implemented yet.
Mostly the providers have not been written yet
harry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From initial reading Puppet looks very powerful tool, but I am looking
> for a solution that support multiple OS including windows. Why can't I
> use Puppet for Windows ? (Couldn't I simply run JRuby?)
Puppet has to understand how to do things on target platforms, for
exa
Brice Figureau wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects.
>>> Can't do it at
>>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the
>>> system for this, because
>>> I'd like it as
I'm also in Boston! I'd love to meet up!
Sent from my iPhone
On May 28, 2009, at 5:15 PM, "Thomas A. McGonagle"
wrote:
>
> Hey, I live and work in Cambridge. Ill be there. Please let me know
> when you decide on the details. Thanks.
> -Tom
> On May 28, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Joe McDonagh wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I've been meaning to do this for ages In the Puppet tarball is a
directory called "ext" that contains some extras that aren't exactly
mainline but could be useful to people. You can see it's current
contents at:
http://github.com/reduct
Hi,
in this simplified example, I'm trying to create directories, and add
each directory name into a variable,
later on, generate a file which its content should be the directory
names, but it doesn't work
any help appreciated.
Thanks,
Ohad
node default {
include b
}
class a {
file{"/tmp/
I thought the following would work and allow me to access a nodes variables
from within a definition. It seems that classes and nodes, while similar,
are different from the point of view of qualified variables.
Can someone confirm this?
The obvious workaround is to define all variables within a c
I might be wrong Ohad but my understanding is that puppet configurations are
declarative and therefore have to be compiled. It probably helps to stop
thinking about your define as being a function, executed at run time, and
think of it as a macro that is substitued all over the place. It is not a
f
I think I'm going to try and do this with external types.
Joel
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Joel Heenan wrote:
> I thought the following would work and allow me to access a nodes variables
> from within a definition. It seems that classes and nodes, while similar,
> are different from the p
Junhao schrieb:
> Greg wrote:
>
>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects.
>> Can't do it at
>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the
>> system for this, because
>> I'd like it as well...
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On May 27, 9:56 pm, philipp Ha
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Joel Heenan wrote:
> I might be wrong Ohad but my understanding is that puppet configurations
> are declarative and therefore have to be compiled. It probably helps to stop
> thinking about your define as being a function, executed at run time, and
> think of it a
28 matches
Mail list logo
