[Puppet Users] Re: Testing puppet manifests

2009-02-08 Thread Ohad Levy
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Larry Ludwig wrote: > > Hmm some comments to this... > > This sounds like a bear to maintain, while I think it's important to > do in a complex environment like you have. > The structure itself is complicated, however the usage is quite simple if you understand t

[Puppet Users] Re: Are version 0.24.1 and 0.24.4 good enough?

2009-02-08 Thread Kyle Cordes
On Feb 7, 5:19 pm, Jon Stanley wrote: > Augeas support was introduced in 0.24.7 - but I'm not quite able to Thanks for the pointer - Augeas appears to be a very good thing (I encountered it a while back), far superior to manual scripting / sed hackery to adjust configuration files. Unless any

[Puppet Users] Re: Are version 0.24.1 and 0.24.4 good enough?

2009-02-08 Thread Mike Renfro
Kyle Cordes wrote: > Unless anyone else points out anything major though, it appears I can > safely go ahead with a variety of 0.24.x versions, get everything up > and running, then at that point (in an automated fashion) get the > latest deployed everywhere. I found I needed a custom repository

[Puppet Users] Re: Testing puppet manifests

2009-02-08 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Matt wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > I gather you run puppet --parseonly for each new file that svn is going to > commit. Do you have your pre-hook to share? It's actually perforce, not subversion... and is kind of integrated into some custom infrastructure here. Basical

[Puppet Users] Re: Testing puppet manifests

2009-02-08 Thread Larry Ludwig
> > The  structure itself is complicated, however the usage is quite simple if > you understand the structure. nevertheless, if you have any > better/simpler idea - I would really love to hear it.. I'm starting to look into what other users of Puppet are doing before I draw any conclusions/re

[Puppet Users] Re: Testing puppet manifests

2009-02-08 Thread Larry Ludwig
> > I would really love to have a public repo (and if I'm allowed, I would love > to publish our manifests) I know that there was a try to get a public repo - > is it still around? > I know about: http://projects.reductivelabs.com/projects/show/pcm But I haven't seen much action with this yet.

[Puppet Users] Re: Are version 0.24.1 and 0.24.4 good enough?

2009-02-08 Thread James Turnbull
Kyle Cordes wrote: > > On Feb 7, 5:19 pm, Jon Stanley wrote: > >> Augeas support was introduced in 0.24.7 - but I'm not quite able to The language was significantly expanded in 0.24.6 and 0.24.7 as you can read at http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/LanguageTutorial. Additionally, a numb

[Puppet Users] Re: Are version 0.24.1 and 0.24.4 good enough?

2009-02-08 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 06:19:06PM -0500, Jon Stanley wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Robin Lee Powell > wrote: > > > I'm not sure which version includes Augeas support, but I'm > > pretty hooked on that myself. > > Augeas support was introduced in 0.24.7 - but I'm not quite able >

[Puppet Users] Re: Thoughts: Advantages of having a puppetmaster ?

2009-02-08 Thread Luke Kanies
On Feb 5, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > So we've been tossing around the idea of rsyncing our puppet manifests > onto our laptop clients and always running puppet locally. > > This is primarily due to having conditional puppet manifests that > depend upon facts that may change when

[Puppet Users] Re: Thoughts: Advantages of having a puppetmaster ?

2009-02-08 Thread Luke Kanies
On Feb 5, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Crawford Kyle wrote: > > > On Feb 5, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > >> >> So we've been tossing around the idea of rsyncing our puppet >> manifests >> onto our laptop clients and always running puppet locally. >> >> This is primarily due to having conditi

[Puppet Users] Solaris SSL error

2009-02-08 Thread chakkerz
Hello there I'm having some issues and i'm not entirely sure where they are starting (I'm not generally a Solaris user). I gather that there are some discussions about the error messages, but if someone could tell me what rock to look under first i'd appreaciate it :) My solaris puppet (puppetsu

[Puppet Users] Re: Solaris SSL error

2009-02-08 Thread Andrew Shafer
I believe that means the cert on the master and the client weren't signed by the same CA. On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:29 PM, chakkerz wrote: > > Hello there > > I'm having some issues and i'm not entirely sure where they are > starting (I'm not generally a Solaris user). I gather that there are