On Feb 5, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Crawford Kyle wrote:

>
>
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>>
>> So we've been tossing around the idea of rsyncing our puppet  
>> manifests
>> onto our laptop clients and always running puppet locally.
>>
>> This is primarily due to having conditional puppet manifests that
>> depend upon facts that may change when the clients are offline, so  
>> the
>> compiled catalog doesn't change until the clients can connect to the
>> puppetmaster(s) again.
>>
>> On the assumption that exposing the puppet manifests themselves to  
>> the
>> clients doesn't create any security issues, I'm interested in  
>> people's
>> thoughts on the advantages of having a puppetmaster for a laptop
>> client base.
>
> I'm thinking that you'll lose reporting and manifest delivery.

Reporting works fine when using 'puppet'.

>
> On the other hand, delivery isn't that hard.  And puppet reporting
> seems pretty bare-bones out of the box anyway.
>
> This may be a good way to more easily integrate puppet into an
> existing management solution that already handles delivery and
> reporting rather than integrate all that into puppet server.  So this
> sounds appealing to me.
>
> Will puppet standalone continue to be supported as a first class
> citizen?


Always.  I'm entirely committed to supporting both the client/server  
and the stand-alone architectures.

-- 
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the
results. -- Sir Winston Churchill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to