Hi Luke,
Sorry for not replying earlier. I missed your reply.
On Oct 13, 2008, at 5:05 pm Luke Kanies wrote:
> What are you going to be doing with the facts? Wouldn't you want to
> just declaratively manage the whole set of groups and volumes and such?
In this particular case I want to cre
Richard,
On Oct 16, 1:47 am, Richard Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a solaris package stored on a puppet server. I'd like
> to be able to maintain the package on a client system without
> having to also keep a copy of the package file on the client
> system. (think lots and lots of pa
Hi
> it is not very well known, but pkgadd can take an URL as dtastream,
> i.e.
> pkgadd -d http://yourserver.com/pkgs/SUNWxyz.pkg
>
> I haven't checked if puppet supports this, but it is worth
> investigating :)
for all other package providers I use, you can use the source param to
install pa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon J Mudd) writes:
> The only thing that surprises me is that I don't see recipes or archives
> which mention the use of LVM for configuring servers with puppet yet
> this seems to be such a basic task of building a server. And at least
> 2 platforms I know use LVM: Linux an
Hello!
I've got question - how to use ssh_autorized_key as a virtual resource?
I've got bunch of users and ssh_authorized_key virtual resources, but
only users gets to the target system - ssh keys not...
I write something like:
class admins {
@user { "username":
...
}
@ssh_authorized_key {
Hello!
My problem is - puppet is not creating users...
I've got class:
class admins {
@user { "graf0":
ensure => present,
uid => 1500,
comment => "Full name",
home => "/home/graf0",
managehome=> true,
shell => "/bin/bash",
password => 'SO
Hello.
I'm running RHEL 4, and have just installed Mongrel and Nginx.
I found and have tried this init script:
http://github.com/duritong/puppet-puppet/tree/master/files/cluster/init.d/puppetmaster.CentOS
Starting puppetmaster works fine, but when I try stopping it I get a "pidof:
invalid optio
I'm probably being dense here, but
Is if possible to include a class, onlyif a given file exists?
If not, can I put an onlyif in all the file/cron/service/etc
statements, so that they are only executed once that file is put in
place (I.e. only run phase 2 of the configging once a file is in p
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 07:16:39AM -0700, zoniguana wrote:
> Is if possible to include a class, onlyif a given file exists?
Currently not, this is bug
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/show/651 on which I'm going to
start work Really Soon Now (tm).
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hey Zoniguana,
zoniguana wrote:
> I'm probably being dense here, but
>
> Is if possible to include a class, onlyif a given file exists?
> If not, can I put an onlyif in all the file/cron/service/etc
> statements, so that they are only executed once that file is put in
> place (I.e. only run ph
Ok, silly me...
Users are there - defined in ldap... Sorry for nosie :)
>
---
Grzegorz Marszałek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send
That is perfect! Thank you!
So, if I have:
Class A for basic stuff
Class B for system specific stuff
and Class C for other stuff that has to happen after classes A & B,
then, if I have, say, file { "/foo/bar/snarfblatt": require => Class[" B"],
etc; } in class C
And then require File["/foo/bar/sn
Justin Williams wrote:
> That is perfect! Thank you!
>
> So, if I have:
> Class A for basic stuff
> Class B for system specific stuff
> and Class C for other stuff that has to happen after classes A & B,
> then, if I have, say, file { "/foo/bar/snarfblatt": require => Class["
> B"], etc; } in cla
>>> hmmm. looks like a patch from Marc Fournier attempts to address the same
>>> thing and I'm not sure both are necessary (and they conflict in some
>>> cases). I suppose it depends on what behavior is appropriate.
>>>
>>> Marc's patch will not perform the onlyif get/match if the node doesn't
>>
This is exactly the kind of info that I was once hunting for a month or two
ago. The ability to have one class depend upon another, or to have one
class depend upon an another type, is huge, and simplifies so much for me!
Thank you!!!
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Teyo Tyree <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks, that got it going for me. I don't know if there was a typo in my
block of code, but it didn't work for the first time around.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Andrew Shafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Gary,
>
> The templates are using standard ERB, which essentially gives you the
> abil
I think your original snippet doesn't work because the first if is inside an
<%= %> block. So the rest of the code probably doesn't parse right.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Gary Richardson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Thanks, that got it going for me. I don't know if there was a typo in my
>
Yes. Thanks a lot for the update, working nicely now. I've created my
own pkg's with createpackage.sh from the 0.24.6rc1 tarball and am
testing that.
On Oct 16, 1:11 am, "Nigel Kersten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should also add this has been committed upstream.
>
> http://projects.reductivel
Marc Fournier wrote:
hmmm. looks like a patch from Marc Fournier attempts to address the same
thing and I'm not sure both are necessary (and they conflict in some
cases). I suppose it depends on what behavior is appropriate.
Marc's patch will not perform the onlyif get/ma
>> The patch I sent indeed focused on the need for this workaround. The
>> behaviour of Joel's patch is definitely better.
>
>
> So.. to verify... you are good?
Sorry, I wasn't very clear. Yes Joel's patch works fine for me.
Marc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You receiv
20 matches
Mail list logo