Ah, yes, in this case putting it in a class wouldn't work. Well, obviously it
wouldn't apply to all variables but in case of paths what I often to is split
it, e.g. have $log_root = "/var/log" in the class and in the define do
${class::log_root}/${site}.
On Thursday 25 Mar 2010 13:42:13 Gustav
well, forget what I said.. It seems that I have misunderstood the variable
scope...
I will try to do as you suggest.
Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Gustavo Soares wrote:
> Hi, Michael, thank you for your reply.
>
> What I mean about "dynamic variables" is:
>
> let's say that I have
Hi, Michael, thank you for your reply.
What I mean about "dynamic variables" is:
let's say that I have a variable like *$log_path = "/var/log/$site" *to
specify the log path for different applications
that run on the same host. Thus, depending on the value of $site
variable, the $log_path varia
On Thursday 25 Mar 2010 11:48:44 Gustavo Soares wrote:
> I have thought of using qualified variables, but i think that won't work
> inside a tempalte, right? Or can I do <%= class::variable %> ?
It will but you have to use <%= scope.lookup('class::variable') %> (note,
typing from memory, to be su
I have thought of using qualified variables, but i think that won't work
inside a tempalte, right? Or can I do <%= class::variable %> ?
And I guess that if I am using dynamic variables, once I include the it
will be evaluated only once, right?
Gus
--- Original message ---
From: Michael
On Wednesday 24 Mar 2010 22:15:27 Michael DeHaan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Gustavo Soares
wrote:
> > Hi, Michael! thanks for your reply!
> >
> > actually it is the opposite.. :) i.e, I want to use the same variable,
> > but in different definitions...
>
> Ok, sorry for the confusi
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Gustavo Soares wrote:
> Hi, Michael! thanks for your reply!
>
> actually it is the opposite.. :) i.e, I want to use the same variable, but
> in different definitions...
>
Ok, sorry for the confusion.
I would have thought "$common_variables::x" would have worked
Hi, Michael! thanks for your reply!
actually it is the opposite.. :) i.e, I want to use the same variable, but
in different definitions...
Using classes, I can accomplish that using class inheritance, but with
definitions.. I have no clue...
Just to clarify the reason of that...
1) I have a cou
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Michael DeHaan
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Gustavo Soares
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody!
>>
>> I would like to share a group of variables between definitions and I don't
>> know what it is the best approach to do this...
>>
>> First, let me explain th
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Gustavo Soares wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I would like to share a group of variables between definitions and I don't
> know what it is the best approach to do this...
>
> First, let me explain the situation...
>
> I were using a class and defining those variables
10 matches
Mail list logo
