On 12/30/2012 04:30 PM, Ramin K wrote:
On 12/30/2012 6:47 AM, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
I've thought about that. This is a basically a service, but I can have
multiple instances of the process running with different
configurations. As I understand, I would need to create a new service
script for e
On 12/30/2012 6:47 AM, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
I've thought about that. This is a basically a service, but I can have
multiple instances of the process running with different
configurations. As I understand, I would need to create a new service
script for each instance.
Jason
We manage many i
On 12/30/2012 07:53 AM, Erik Dalén wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to use a service definition with the base provider
and supply your start, restart & status commands?
On 30 December 2012 03:27, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble with an exec type. I'm using an exec type to start a
Wouldn't it be easier to use a service definition with the base provider
and supply your start, restart & status commands?
On 30 December 2012 03:27, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble with an exec type. I'm using an exec type to start a
> buildbot slave. It's a long-running ps
Thanks, that worked!
On 12/29/2012 09:38 PM, Maarten Thibaut (mthibaut) wrote:
Hi,
I believe the onlyif "wins" in this case. Splitting it up into two statements
would be the right thing to do IMO.
It would also be cleaner, since they are in effect two different cases: stopped
(and in need o
Hi,
I believe the onlyif "wins" in this case. Splitting it up into two statements
would be the right thing to do IMO.
It would also be cleaner, since they are in effect two different cases: stopped
(and in need of starting), and running (but in need of restart).
The fact that these both run t
