Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Extending Puppet using Rubygems

2012-06-27 Thread Michael Stahnke
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:19 AM, jcbollinger wrote: > > > On Saturday, June 23, 2012 7:38:20 PM UTC-5, Kelsey Hightower wrote: >> >> There is a pending pull request that adds the ability for Puppet to load >> Faces, parser functions, and report processors installed via Rubygems. >> >> https://gith

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Extending Puppet using Rubygems

2012-06-26 Thread llow...@oreillyauto.com
This sort of support would have saved me about 2-3 days of time here recently. It certainly has my support, and I have upvoted the pull the request. On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:55:50 AM UTC-5, Kelsey Hightower wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:41:00 AM UTC-4, jmslagle wrote: >> >> >> On 06

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Extending Puppet using Rubygems

2012-06-26 Thread Kelsey Hightower
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:41:00 AM UTC-4, jmslagle wrote: > > > On 06/25/2012 09:25 AM, Kelsey Hightower wrote: > > > > John you make a really good point. Rubygems support would be totally > > optional. One of my hopes is that once people are able to use rubygems > > for things like parser fu

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Extending Puppet using Rubygems

2012-06-26 Thread Eric Shamow
Jason, Packaging gems as OS packages is pretty easy to do. You can use gem2rpm on RHEL systems or fpm (https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm) in the more general case. -Eric On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Jason Slagle wrote: > > On 06/25/2012 09:25 AM, Kelsey Hightower wrote: > >> >> John you

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Extending Puppet using Rubygems

2012-06-26 Thread Jason Slagle
On 06/25/2012 09:25 AM, Kelsey Hightower wrote: John you make a really good point. Rubygems support would be totally optional. One of my hopes is that once people are able to use rubygems for things like parser functions and report processors we start seeing more OS packages built from those