On 06/25/2012 09:25 AM, Kelsey Hightower wrote:
John you make a really good point. Rubygems support would be totally optional. One of my hopes is that once people are able to use rubygems for things like parser functions and report processors we start seeing more OS packages built from those gems.
More useful might be a good and easy way to create OS packages to do plugins like this.
That would solve some amount of the chicken and egg problem you see bootstrapping puppet clients that need certain plugins.
I suspect this change will allow that since it will suck plugin stuff from a system location, so we don't have to go trying to create packages to throw stuff in $libdir?
Thanks! Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
