On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:16 AM, Ryan Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something here, but how is that even possible since
> the namevar is not unique? Puppet would produce an error when trying to
> declare that second resource, since it has the same name as the first.
> If t
Hey folks,
Before responding to the ticket below, I think I should provide a little
bit more qualifying information. I had a discussion with Luke Kanies
regarding the design of the ssh_authorized_keys type, and the agreement
we came to was that the key itself would be a good identifier becaus
Hi
> You're correct, let's move that discussion into the mailing-list
> instead of chatting in the tickets.
+1
> In #1644 you wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, the proper design would be to have ONE
>> ssh_authorized_key resource per user, and that you should be able
>> to provide an array for both t
Hi Ryan,
You're correct, let's move that discussion into the mailing-list instead
of chatting in the tickets.
In #1644 you wrote:
> In my opinion, the proper design would be to have ONE ssh_authorized_key
> resource per user, and that you should be able to provide an array for both
> the "tar
