On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:16 AM, Ryan Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something here, but how is that even possible since > the namevar is not unique? Puppet would produce an error when trying to > declare that second resource, since it has the same name as the first. > If this worked, I wouldn't be opposed to it, as it makes identification > of the user associated with the key much easier, but as I understand it, > that's not possible. And even if it were, I would think it would > certainly confuse people if "all resource identifiers in Puppet must be > unique, EXCEPT for ssh_authorized_key types". Additionally, the above
I may be missing the point here, but isn't there a similar exception already, in the case of exec's ? I think the solution here is to have the namevar be the key, as others have suggested. --Paul --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
