Kenton Brede wrote:
> I searched through old messages and didn't see that this had been
> addressed. I can see people wanting facter to report the minor
> version and others wanting just the major release number. The way it
> stands I'll need to change every operatingystemrelease variable, each
I posted a question about the lsb prefixed facts a few weeks ago.
lsbmaj may be what you're looking for.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Kenton Brede wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I for one, thinks that the operatingsystemrelease fact should con
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I for one, thinks that the operatingsystemrelease fact should contain only
> the major number of the operating system, e.g. for Centos/Rehat 5.4 it
> should return just 5.
>
> the reason behind it is that I rarely use the full release ver
Hi,
I for one, thinks that the operatingsystemrelease fact should contain only
the major number of the operating system, e.g. for Centos/Rehat 5.4 it
should return just 5.
the reason behind it is that I rarely use the full release version as a
variable, and if I do, I use the lsb facts.
this cha
