John and Tim, thanks for your replies and patience.
In the end, the solution of Tim seems to work great! That was what I was
looking for: a relatively straight solution to a relatively straight
problem (at least, that was what I thought to improve the previous
situation).
As a novice to intermed
On Monday, November 5, 2012 2:17:11 PM UTC-6, Erwin Bogaard wrote:
>
> As I'm in over my head, let's supply you with (part of) the manifests in
> question:
>
> The define:
>
> define sugar::definitions_sug_wp (
> $template = 'sugar/etc/httpd/conf.d/sugar6x.conf.erb',
> $client_
In regard to: [Puppet Users] Re: Apply multiple defines in sequence, Erwin...:
Thanks again for you reply, but it seems like you don't fully understand
what I'm having problems with. So I'll try to clarify it a little more:
1. The current way of using two defines is working flawl
After my previous post, I did some more thinking and reasearch. What do you
think about:
- using an if/else-conditional. Would that work?
- using virtual resources? would that work?
On Monday, November 5, 2012 9:17:11 PM UTC+1, Erwin Bogaard wrote:
>
> As I'm in over my head, let's supply you wit
As I'm in over my head, let's supply you with (part of) the manifests in
question:
The define:
define sugar::definitions_sug_wp (
$template = 'sugar/etc/httpd/conf.d/sugar6x.conf.erb',
$client_domain = "$title",
$mysql_rootpwd = "$mysql_password",
$mysql_dbname,
On Monday, November 5, 2012 3:48:58 AM UTC-6, Erwin Bogaard wrote:
>
> Thanks again for you reply, but it seems like you don't fully understand
> what I'm having problems with. So I'll try to clarify it a little more:
> 1. The current way of using two defines is working flawlessly. So I (at
> l
Thanks again for you reply, but it seems like you don't fully understand
what I'm having problems with. So I'll try to clarify it a little more:
1. The current way of using two defines is working flawlessly. So I (at
least partly) understand the concepts surrounding those.
2. Because I have two t
On Friday, November 2, 2012 2:54:11 PM UTC-5, Erwin Bogaard wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply. Let me clarify things a little more.
> I use the following class to apply to a certain node:
>
> class sugar::instances {
>
> sugar::definitions_sugar {
> # SugarCRM - ECM2
> 'node1':
>
Thanks for your reply. Let me clarify things a little more.
I use the following class to apply to a certain node:
class sugar::instances {
sugar::definitions_sugar {
# SugarCRM - ECM2
'node1':
mysql_dbname => 'dbname1',
mysql_pwd=> 'password1';
sugar::definitions_
On Friday, November 2, 2012 7:14:14 AM UTC-5, Erwin Bogaard wrote:
>
> As there is no response, maybe some extra info:
> For classes I use 'inherits' to apply multiple classes to one resource.
> For defines I can't find a similar technique. Is there one?
>
Perhaps there are no responses becaus
As there is no response, maybe some extra info:
For classes I use 'inherits' to apply multiple classes to one resource. For
defines I can't find a similar technique. Is there one?
On Thursday, November 1, 2012 3:30:52 PM UTC+1, Erwin Bogaard wrote:
>
> In retrospect: a better subject would have b
In retrospect: a better subject would have been 'Apply multiple defines to
one resource'.
But as far as I can see, there is no way to change a subject
On Thursday, November 1, 2012 3:27:10 PM UTC+1, Erwin Bogaard wrote:
>
> I'm having trouble getting the following scenario to work:
> - I have two
12 matches
Mail list logo
