We're in the situation of dealing with multiple operating systems (and will
likely add another) and I'm quickly realizing that building logic in the
manifest to deal with the differences in Red Hat i386 vs Red Hat x86_64 vs
SuSE i586 vs SuSE x86_64 vs Mac is getting tedious. For instance, in the
ss
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Nan Liu wrote:
>
> >
> > I suspect I'm doing something incorrect or misunderstanding something.
>
> Puppet classes are singletons, even if you include a class multiple
> times it only realize the resources defined in the class once.
>
Ahhh - ok, makes sense.
>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> >
> > The class:
> > from rpm_gpg/manifests/init.pp
> > class rpm_gpg {
> > include
> > "rpm_gpg::keys::spacewalk2010",
> > "rpm_gpg::keys::jpackage"
> > }
>
>
>
> root@devlucid:/home/nigel/src/puppe
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Jeff Falgout
> wrote:
> > Group -
> >
> > I'm putting a presentation together for $work (a large .gov) and I want
> to
> > make sure I get my facts (pun intended) st
Group -
I'm putting a presentation together for $work (a large .gov) and I want to
make sure I get my facts (pun intended) straight ...
Are the following steps for Facter-Client-Server interaction correct (I have
a feeling not):
1. Client puppet run is initiated (via regular schedule, puppetrun,
Justin -
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:36 PM, wrote:
> I currently manage approximately 150 hosts with a handful of ZLM policies,
> but I've had one too many policies lost by the management server to keep
> using this solution.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has any experiences (good or bad) they'd be
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Jeff Falgout wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Ross McKerchar
> wrote:
>
>
>> As I'm not great at ruby, I find writing facts and distributing them to do a
>> really simple thing can be a bit painful. Along these lines what
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Ross McKerchar
wrote:
> As I'm not great at ruby, I find writing facts and distributing them to do a
> really simple thing can be a bit painful. Along these lines what about:
>
As Luke put it for python - ruby makes my eyes bleed - I struggle
with Ruby a lot
Hi John,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 8:56 AM, John Philips wrote:
>
> Anybody know of such a system, or are willing to share your home-brewed
> solution?
>
Check out MachDB ( http://www.machdb.org/ ) It's still in alpha
development but I've talked with Nathan and it still is an active
project. I'
