On Sep 22, 2014 7:19 PM, "treydock" wrote:
> Error: /Stage[main]/R10k::Install/Package[r10k]/ensure: change from
["1.2.1"] to 1.3.4 failed: Could not update: Execution of '/usr/bin/gem
install -v 1.3.4 --no-rdoc --no-ri r10k ' returned 1: ERROR: Can't use
--version w/ multiple gems. Use name:ver
file { "/System/Library/User
Template/English.lproj/Library/Preferences/${source}" : # the source is
the file from the line directly below, this seems true as the correct files
copy when I have only
No its just not like that
$source would need to be defined in or passed to the scope your file
re
Hey John,
Thanks for the reply and comments to my questions. I understand what
you're saying and the ideas of include/inherit/contain make better sense
now.
Cheers,
Mike.
On Friday, September 19, 2014 4:01:28 PM UTC-7, Mike Reed wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have a question about class and sub
On 09/21/2014 05:59 PM, Justin Timberlake wrote:
> puppet:/etc/puppet/manifests # puppet apply -dv user-absent.pp
> Debug: Runtime environment: run_mode=user, ruby_version=1.8.7,
> puppet_version=3.7.0
> Debug: Executing '/usr/bin/env
> PUPPET_DASHBOARD_URL=http://puppet.novell.com:3000
> /usr/s
Oh, yes, that's *lovely*, thank you!
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:33:03AM -0400, Christopher Wood wrote:
> It's a bit unintuitively named (for my values of intuition), maybe this helps?
>
> https://docs.puppetlabs.com/references/latest/configuration.html#usecacheonfailure
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014
Hi Gabriel,
>From the recent PuppetConf talk on Puppet Server, the goal appears to be to
move this way. However, many things need to be worked out. Not the least of
which is how 'puppet apply' and msterless is going to work.
The speed improvements and smaller resource usage appear quite impressiv
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Gabriel Filion wrote:
> On 23/09/14 12:11 PM, Nate Wolfe wrote:
>> We are thrilled to announce the preview release of Puppet Server, our
>> newest open source project.
>> Puppet Server is a next-generation alternative to our current Puppet
>> master, which builds o
On 23/09/14 12:11 PM, Nate Wolfe wrote:
> We are thrilled to announce the preview release of Puppet Server, our
> newest open source project.
> Puppet Server is a next-generation alternative to our current Puppet
> master, which builds on the
> successful Clojure technology stack underlying project
I thought I had it, but I don't. I will post my code and explain what I
think it is doing. Perhaps someone can see my misunderstanding.
This is init.pp in a module called managed_preferences.
class managed_preferences {
}
define mac_managed_preferences ($application) { #application variable
We are thrilled to announce the preview release of Puppet Server, our
newest open source project.
Puppet Server is a next-generation alternative to our current Puppet
master, which builds on the
successful Clojure technology stack underlying projects like PuppetDB.
Packages are available in the Pu
Any help on this? Should I file a bug?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Sebastian Otaegui
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> did the metadata accepted change recently? I have a module that had a
> 'requirements' field populated with the puppet version, but now when I try
> to release a new module to the forge
It's a bit unintuitively named (for my values of intuition), maybe this helps?
https://docs.puppetlabs.com/references/latest/configuration.html#usecacheonfailure
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:26:22AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
> So right now, puppet is doing this because of DNS issues:
>
>
So right now, puppet is doing this because of DNS issues:
Warning: Unable to fetch my node definition, but the agent run will
continue:
Warning: getaddrinfo: Name or service not known
Info: Retrieving pluginfacts
Error: /File[/var/lib/puppet/facts.d]: Failed to generate additiona
John,
I would like to re-explain the problem I am trying to solve to make sure
that what I want to do is possible, and that it can be done in the way you
are trying to help me.
In my first post, I mentioned wanting different modules to write to the
/System/Library/User
Template/English.lproj/
On Monday, September 22, 2014 2:05:42 PM UTC-5, Vladimir Brik wrote:
> Here's roughly what I am thinking of doing (but I am wondering if there
> is a better way).
>
> site.pp:
> # this is in global area of site.pp. so that all nodes, whether
> they
> # use statlog or not i
On Monday, September 22, 2014 6:36:32 PM UTC-5, Robert Davidson wrote:
>
> When creating users from hiera, it's simple enough to make them all
> virtual using create_resources and then realize them. This does leave me
> with a question, though.
>
> How do I make sure that the assorted groups a
On Monday, September 22, 2014 11:18:55 AM UTC-5, Mike Reed wrote:
>
> Hey Nan and John,
>
> Thank you both for the replies and insight into my questions below; they
> are most helpful and very much appreciated.
>
> Based on your answers, I have few other questions that occurred to me:
>
> In res
On Monday, September 22, 2014 4:51:38 PM UTC-5, aar...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I did the following to see if it would work, and I got (for me anyway) a
> surprising result. It may be the source of some of my confusion and reason
> why I'm finding this so difficult. Note, I don't want to do this
On Monday, September 22, 2014 2:58:52 PM UTC-5, aar...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thanks Neil,
>
> In yours and Johns example you both have ${title} at the end of
> Preferences. When I tried this (after his post, I haven't tried your code
> yet), I ended up with a folder called Preferences/office_20
I'm attempting to make the jump to directory-based environments and am
curious about what to do with custom facts.
In my current config I've tried putting custom facts into a separate module
as /etc/puppet/modules/facts/{manifest,lib} and
/etc/puppet/modules/facts/lib/facter/. I haven't had any
Hi,
Received the same kind of error with a different message, using Puppet
3.7.2 with future parser;
Error: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER:
Syntax error at '[' at
/etc/puppet/environments/tst/modules/managesoft/manifests/install.pp:41:23
on node
Had the
Hi,
what I do in this case is create a fact that returns which statlog are
configured. then I do the difference (stdlib) between this and what should
the machine have. Would be something like this (caution, not tested :)):
$shouldhave=['bar','foo']
$currentlyhave=$::some_fact_with_an_array_of_
22 matches
Mail list logo
