On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Ashley Penney wrote:
>
> All I know is that telling users "If you download 5 modules from puppet
> forge
> make sure you go through them all, extract any duplicating resources into
> random modules that exist purely to allow you to realize packages" instead
> lead
No questions or problems today, just thought the list might like to
see that puppet is being used by a (another) site/company with a ton
of traffic:
http://blog.reddit.com/2012/01/january-2012-state-of-servers.html
I'm hoping I can persuade them to talk a bit more about how they use
puppet and wh
This is a fantastic reply and I appreciate the work you put into it. I
have just one
question. As it stands functions can only apply to partial catalogs and
not to the
full catalog. Is this a fundamental design decision that cannot be
changed? Perhaps
it would be interesting to speculate on wha
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 17:19, jblaine wrote:
> IDEA: Allow for a special YAML document to be spit out by custom ENCs
> when error conditions in the ENC are hit. It would contain information that
> can be shown in the console/reports ?
Sounds good. I am happy to look at extending the exec ENC
Yes, the code outputs nothing and calls sys.exit(1) if the host cannot be
found in our database. Running as pe-puppet, which the stock ENC runs
as from what I can tell, it runs fine and $? is 0.
[ 5 minutes later ]
Oh jeez.
I was misreading the red "Log" info for it, assuming it was the same
ol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff,
Thanks for the concise write-up, it was really helpful for parsing through all
of the different arguments.
I would like to second the idea that Aaron Grewell had earlier that some sort
of exception handling be allowed and that some other meth
Welcome to the first maintenance release for Puppet in the
new year. Since we skipped a December release, this release is rather
large.
Thanks for the help during Triage-a-thon. It was a great event. See
the Puppet Labs blog for the recap.
We have several section of release notes this month d
I ran into the same error briefly on RHEL 6 with Puppet 2.7.9. After
downgrading to 2.7.8 master, everything works as expected. There's so
few difference when running git diff 2.7.8..2.7.9, I can't see what
could possibly cause this bug. And in the process of trying to confirm
the bug and upgrading
ahah. I'm sorry, I sent you down completely the wrong path.
405 Method Not Allowed
Method Not Allowed
The requested method PUT is not allowed for the URL /production/report/
slcupuppet.slc.sharkrivertech.com.
That error was for the report processor, not the catalog retrieval. I
apologize.
This
When you run your script by hand, does it exit 0 ?
Does it do so when the user you are running the master as (pe-puppet I
believe in this case) runs the script?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:15 PM, jblaine wrote:
> If anyone has any ideas, please share. I'm at a loss.
>
> YAML from Puppet Enterp
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 15:15, jblaine wrote:
> If anyone has any ideas, please share. I'm at a loss.
> YAML from Puppet Enterprise 2.0.0 default ENC:
>
>
> ---
> name: rcf-cm-master.our.org
> parameters: {}
>
> classes:
> - core-permissions
> +++
If anyone has any ideas, please share. I'm at a loss.
YAML from Puppet Enterprise 2.0.0 default ENC:
---
name: rcf-cm-master.our.org
parameters: {}
classes:
- core-permissions
YAML from my Python ENC using PyYAML. This res
I was looking through the Puppet style guide for something unrelated,
and noticed that it explicitly discourages doing things in this exact
manner:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/style_guide.html -> Section 11.9.
Does the style guide need updated then?
Justin
On Jan 13, 4:17 pm, Gary Larizza
Welcome to the first maintenance release for Facter in the new year.
It includes contributions from the following people: Adrien Thebo,
Barrie Bremner, Gary Larizza, Jonathan Boyett, Josh Cooper, Ken
Barber, Marcus Vinicius Ferreira, Matt Dainty, Michael Kincaid, Moses
Mendoza, Pieter Lexis
This
Just for completeness:
# type --all puppet{,d,masterd}
puppet is /usr/bin/puppet
puppetd is /usr/bin/puppetd
puppetmasterd is /usr/bin/puppetmasterd
# puppet --version
2.7.9
# puppetd --version
2.7.9
# puppetmasterd --version
2.7.9
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Peter Berghold wrote:
> The
Thanks for responding.
My brain must have an excess of fuzz to not remember that method.
The old "Make the Change and See If It Breaks" technique ! :)
However, your observation of "manifest"/"manifests" was on target. My stray
directory has a final s, and to my delight, removing it had no (nega
There is only one version of puppet (agent and master) on the system. This
system was installed from bare metal this morning.
On Jan 25, 2012 4:24 PM, "Nigel Kersten" wrote:
do you have multiple versions of puppet installed?
If you're in bash:
$ type --all puppet{,d,masterd}
Do you get differ
do you have multiple versions of puppet installed?
If you're in bash:
$ type --all puppet{,d,masterd}
Do you get different versions returned for:
$ puppet --version
$ puppetd --version
On newer installs you should be using "puppet agent" instead of "puppetd"
(We moved to git-style subcommands
master and agent are on the same box. they should be the same version.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> This looks like you've got a puppet agent that is newer than the version
> of your master.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Peter Berghold
> wrote:
>
>> Just
This looks like you've got a puppet agent that is newer than the version of
your master.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Peter Berghold wrote:
> Just got done installing apache2, passenger, puppet, dashboard over the
> day...
>
> Ran my first puppetd --test and got the following:
>
> # puppet
Just got done installing apache2, passenger, puppet, dashboard over the
day...
Ran my first puppetd --test and got the following:
# puppetd --test
info: Loading facts in root_home
info: Loading facts in facter_dot_d
info: Loading facts in concat_basedir
info: Loading facts in root_home
info: Load
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> I'm looking for strong opinions on whether we should or shouldn't deprecate
> the defined() function for Telly, the next major Puppet release this year.
>
> jcbollinger put it quite well in another thread:
>
> "Use of the "defined" function i
The directory that probably represents is /etc/puppet/manifests (with an
"s")... however, not seeing your puppet installation, there is a chance
that it could be "needed" for something. The best bet is probably to
(temporarily) move it out of the way and see if things start complaining
(puppet agen
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:59:10 -0500
Nan Liu wrote:
[...]
> > i.e. Say there were two unrelated modules which said slightly
> > different but *compatible* things:
> >
> > Module a:
> >
> > file { "/foo/bar":
> > ensure => 'present',
> > owner => 'root',
> > content => "blah blah",
> > }
> >
On 01/25/2012 06:59 PM, Ashley Penney wrote:
> After all, if they've been included on the host all of those attributes
> should apply so I can't see a dangerous downside to this.
Nan provided some killer arguments (imho) in the proper cross-dependency
thread.
--
You received this message because
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Ashley Penney wrote:
> I don't have a solution but I do want to chime in and state that modules
> that
> exist just to collect together virtual resources is a horrible thing.
> We're just
> talking about working around the way Puppet works right now rather than
>
I don't have a solution but I do want to chime in and state that modules
that
exist just to collect together virtual resources is a horrible thing.
We're just
talking about working around the way Puppet works right now rather than
defining what the end solution should be.
I would be happiest with
Can anyone offer a reason for having a folder with a path of
/etc/puppet/modules/manifest ?
I think I got overzealous making /etc/puppet/modules//manifest
directories, but I am still new enough to Puppet to be unsure -- and I am smart
enough NOT to just delete it without checking with a referen
On 25/01/12 16:59, Christopher Wood wrote:
> Also, could you expound? I don't know any production scenario where it's
> desirable to have anything other than "an exact known configuration of hosts".
Well, it's one thing to have an exact known and audited configuration.
It'd be another to try and
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Felix Frank <
felix.fr...@alumni.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there was a discussion in the "can we deprecate defined() in Telly"
> thread about how we can even begin to design Forge modules without it.
>
> A recurring problem is that multiple modules rely on cer
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:53:15AM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Nick wrote:
> > But then I have to anticipate every possible value of $shell and define
> > resources for them. Anything which is not defined like this is not usable
> > within the scheme, because there will b
On Jan 25, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Nick wrote:
> But then I have to anticipate every possible value of $shell and define
> resources for them. Anything which is not defined like this is not usable
> within the scheme, because there will be no file resource to realize and
> require. And of course, it al
On 25/01/12 14:57, Nan Liu wrote:
>> To sum up, it appears that this feature is missing for a reason, but why?
>> And
>> what's the best workaround available?
>
> I'm assuming you mean if a resources exist in the catalog and not the
> question of whether a file exist on the agent since they are
I'd rather use Ubuntu LTS but that's not a valid template with my VPS
provider unfortunately. Ubuntu 11 64 bit is available and seems to work OK
for now. Debian 6 had become my standard but it would seem there was an
issue with Debian 6 and the hypervisor the VPS provider uses and last I
heard the
On Jan 25, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Brian Wong wrote:
> I have been reading about the LDAP ENC at the wiki
> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/LDAP_Nodes.
>
> I am considering using the LDAP ENC, but I have a couple of concerns
> when it comes to the implementation.
> - It seems that
I have been reading about the LDAP ENC at the wiki
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/LDAP_Nodes.
I am considering using the LDAP ENC, but I have a couple of concerns
when it comes to the implementation.
- It seems that the example using the entry attribute 'ipHostNumber'
as a pup
Unfortunately I am unable to reproduce this except outside the target
virtualized environment, currently unavailable due to resource concerns.
So far courier-imap and courier-pop restart as they should elsewhere.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Felix Frank wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 07:08
inline
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:48:27AM -0500, Peter Berghold wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>Over the last week or so I've been banging my head against the wall trying
>to get dashboard working and trying to figure out why "end of file"
>reports are happening during some of my puppet runs
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 05:14:51PM +0200, Walter Heck wrote:
> Go with Debian or an Ubuntu LTS version instead of the latest Ubuntu,
> you'll have much longer support:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(operating_system)#Releases
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian#Releases
I concur with the
Go with Debian or an Ubuntu LTS version instead of the latest Ubuntu,
you'll have much longer support:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(operating_system)#Releases
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian#Releases
Enjoy!
Walter Heck
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 16:48, Peter Berghold wrote:
> Hi folks,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Nick wrote:
> On 24/01/12 19:53, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> What if you made two functions:
>>
>> 1. declare_capability("foo")
>> This would essentially just create an empty resource, Capability[foo]. If
>> multiple modules tried to declare the same capability, it w
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Nick wrote:
> I want to assert a file exists - but in a way that doesn't have the potential
> to
> create conflicting resource definitions.
>
> I know this has been asked many times before:
>
> "How can I check whether a file exists, like 'File.exists?(file)'
>
Hi folks,
Over the last week or so I've been banging my head against the wall trying
to get dashboard working and trying to figure out why "end of file" reports
are happening during some of my puppet runs. In the process of hacking
around I've managed to trash my puppetmaster so I'm going to do s
On 24/01/12 19:53, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> What if you made two functions:
>
> 1. declare_capability("foo")
> This would essentially just create an empty resource, Capability[foo]. If
> multiple modules tried to declare the same capability, it would error, just
> like
> we do today with duplicat
On 01/25/2012 05:48 AM, Walter Heck wrote:
>>> We'd also need a way to test if a capability is being provided by the
>>> >> system as a whole. Ie, a mysql module needs to be able to check if it
>>> >> needs to include resources for a firewall, monitoring, etc.
>> > Something like defined()? ;-)
> C
45 matches
Mail list logo
