Hi all
We're really excited about the Triage-a-thon tomorrow. It's going to
kick off at 7am PST and go to 4pm PST.
We're going to be in the Puppet Labs offices in Portland (Suite 500 411
NW Park), #puppethack channel on Freenode and available via email on the
various Puppet Lists and announcing
> like shouldn't something like this work??
>
> puppet-lvm {'setvolume':
> vg => 'myvg',
> pv => '/dev/sdb',
> fstype => 'ext3',
> name => 'mylv',
> size =>'8G',
> }
>
>
> https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet-lvm
The module is has a define like this:
defin
What happens when you run this:
puppet apply networking/manifests/init.pp -d -e 'include
networking::resolver'
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:41 PM, bhagyesh wrote:
> file/manifest/init.pp is a class but its not yet included in the
> templete so can be left alone as of now
>
> and the file /tmp/resol
file/manifest/init.pp is a class but its not yet included in the
templete so can be left alone as of now
and the file /tmp/resolve.conf dosent exist but still I am not getting
any output
On Jan 21, 3:46 am, Christopher McCoy wrote:
> Ok, so I'm looking at this again.
>
> what is in file/manife
http://saltstack.org/ http://puppetlabs.com/mcollective/
I found this link that talks about Func, Rundeck, Salt and mcollective, but
it doesn't really compare and contrast.
http://www.coloandcloud.com/editorial/func-mcollective-salt-and-rundeck/(From
a 10,000 overview Saltstack and mcollective loo
Judging from the things you wrote here, you need a bit more
understanding of how puppet works with modules. Also, I see that that
specific module implements a define called lvm::volume, so your
manifest should be implementing a resource like so:
lvm::volume {'setvolume':
vg => 'myvg',
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Aaron Grewell wrote:
>
> Are we sure it can't be fixed? What makes defined() so different from
> the code that implements require? Shouldn't "if not defined" be the
> same as "if a require would fail"? That seems to be what people are
> expecting, why not give
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:47 PM, tborthwick wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've set up a puppetmaster on red hat and a client on windows 7
> (puppet version 2.7.9 on both), and I'm getting this error when I run
> puppet agent --server --waitforcert 60 --test:
>
> info: Applying configuration version '
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Cody wrote:
> Defining all somewhat common packages in a central location becomes
> unrealistic when you no longer "control" the code that is in every
> module you use. If you obtain five modules from the forge and they
> all require a specific package and so all
Hello,
I've set up a puppetmaster on red hat and a client on windows 7
(puppet version 2.7.9 on both), and I'm getting this error when I run
puppet agent --server --waitforcert 60 --test:
info: Applying configuration version '1327098121'
err: /Stage[main]/Win_test/Package[win_test]/ensure: chang
Ok, so I'm looking at this again.
what is in file/manifests/init.pp?
you ran a puppet apply on it, but never showed us what is in it, so it
could just be class file { }
And lastly, does the file /tmp/resolv.conf already exist? If so you won't
see anything output.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM,
On Jan 20, 6:39 am, jcbollinger wrote:
> On Jan 20, 3:00 am, Dan Bode wrote:
>
> > * the big reason I keep on leaning on it is for package dependencies. Often
> > something needs an additional package installed (and it is possible that
> > other modules may have that same package dependency, an
On 20/01/12 19:05, Ashley Penney wrote:
> While this isn't what you want to hear, exactly, there's a bootstrapping tool
> that
> works fantastic with Puppet at http://www.theforeman.org/ - it's probably why
> you don't see many cobbler modules. People like me who used cobbler when
> starting out
You are correct. I do not want to hear about another tool.
I am currently working in a pro-Microsoft-anti-Anything-Else environment that
still uses a boatload of Linux servers to do all the "Ditch Digging". I have
had a tough time convincing them to use this.
I have looked at Foreman. My fir
y a i know that ! but it should show what it will do if --noop is not
applied.
On Jan 21, 1:58 am, Christopher McCoy wrote:
> --noop means no operation
> On Jan 20, 2012 3:50 PM, "bhagyesh" wrote:
>
>
>
> > whenever i run a test from client it finishes sucessfully but client
> > is not getting a
--noop means no operation
On Jan 20, 2012 3:50 PM, "bhagyesh" wrote:
> whenever i run a test from client it finishes sucessfully but client
> is not getting any configuration changes from server
>
> [root@PROXY-02 tmp]# puppetd --noop --test
> notice: Ignoring --listen on onetime run
> info: Cach
whenever i run a test from client it finishes sucessfully but client
is not getting any configuration changes from server
[root@PROXY-02 tmp]# puppetd --noop --test
notice: Ignoring --listen on onetime run
info: Caching catalog for proxy-02.carnation.in
info: Applying configuration version '132709
On 1/20/12 2:34 AM, Nick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking for a module for Cobbler, one which allows me to install a
> kickstart mirror, configure the repos, distros, profiles and systems, as well
> the basic settings.
>
> I found:
>
> - A very old thread started by Sven Muller about writing
While this isn't what you want to hear, exactly, there's a bootstrapping
tool that
works fantastic with Puppet at http://www.theforeman.org/ - it's probably
why
you don't see many cobbler modules. People like me who used cobbler when
starting out with Puppet migrated off to Foreman with time.
On
On 20/01/12 13:57, Dan White wrote:
> I am running Cobbler and Puppet together and I am not sure that a Puppet
> Module is appropriate for more than just the base settings.
>
> Cobbler manages all its internal info. To get Puppet to manage it would,
> IMO, either involve hacking Cobbler or wrappi
There are some good write ups on this topic at:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/environment.html
http://puppetlabs.com/blog/git-workflow-and-puppet-environments/
You are certainly not the first to use this type of workflow.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Dan White wrote:
> Thanks for respon
On Jan 20, 3:38 am, Nan Liu wrote:
> So there is a patch for your specific use case. We should at least
> differentiate defined vs. declared and a patch was written to split
> off defined() vs. declared():
>
> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3124
>
> The warning is simply:
>
> Puppet.warni
On Jan 20, 3:00 am, Dan Bode wrote:
> * the big reason I keep on leaning on it is for package dependencies. Often
> something needs an additional package installed (and it is possible that
> other modules may have that same package dependency, and I don't want to
> have to create a new class eve
On Jan 19, 2:17 pm, Nick Fagerlund
wrote:
> On Jan 19, 11:01 am, "R.I.Pienaar" wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > > Defined() doesn't suck! It's a 100% reliable way to check what
> > > classes and defined types are available to the autoloader. I challenge
> > > anyone
> > > to find
What would you recommend as an alternative way to handle these cases? I
suppose the mysql lib could be extended to be able to check for users (not
easily, but it could be done), but what about in the second case where I
want to check for various roles being set as classes and then use those to
dec
Thanks for responding.
This approach is similar to one of the (messy) ideas I have.
It seems to me that there are no built-in features that will let me do this, so
I am (once again) trail-blazing.
I like the idea of the Dev/Overlord PM using Puppet/(revision control) to run
the Deputy PM's. T
On Jan 20, 4:34 am, Alessandro Franceschi wrote:
> I add my 2 cents.
> The alternatives proposed in the replies are ok for me, just would like to
> express an alternative approach that I''ve used in some situations.
> It's due to different factors:
> - Many packages to manage (but not necessaril
I am running Cobbler and Puppet together and I am not sure that a Puppet Module
is appropriate for more than just the base settings.
Cobbler manages all its internal info. To get Puppet to manage it would, IMO,
either involve hacking Cobbler or wrapping Cobbler command line calls in Puppet
"ex
I am finding the documentation pretty poor on this. Can someone please
help?
I don't understand why I can't pass my variables.
On Jan 17, 10:56 am, Luke wrote:
> i would like to use the module puppet-lvm and would like to pass
> values to it.
>
> I have it setup properly as a module but I can't
Hi Dan,
A lot of people use a revision control system like SVN or Git, and each
Puppet Master independently pulls a revision of Puppet code from this
repository. You could manually control or setup some automatic method of
upgrading your QA and prod machines to certain revisions. Your Dev
pup
Hi,
I've been looking for a module for Cobbler, one which allows me to install a
kickstart mirror, configure the repos, distros, profiles and systems, as well
the basic settings.
I found:
- A very old thread started by Sven Muller about writing a cobbler provider
http://groups.google.com/grou
I add my 2 cents.
The alternatives proposed in the replies are ok for me, just would like to
express an alternative approach that I''ve used in some situations.
It's due to different factors:
- Many packages to manage (but not necessarily)
- Option to include a module in an existing module set, wh
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Nick Fagerlund
wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 19, 11:01 am, "R.I.Pienaar" wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> > Defined() doesn't suck! It's a 100% reliable way to check what
>> > classes and defined types are available to the autoloader. I challenge
>> > anyone
>> >
Hi Dan,
sorry if I come around bluntly about this, but:
On 01/20/2012 10:00 AM, Dan Bode wrote:
> * static resources in a defined resource type (avoids having to use
> classes to store all static dependencies)
>
> * the big reason I keep on leaning on it is for package dependencies.
> Often some
How about deprecating defined?(Type['title']), but allowing it to accept a
resource hash? This would definitely satisfy my use cases while alleviating
concerns about resource attribute conflicts/parse order dependencies
if defined?(
{
package['foo'] => { ensure => present }
}
) {
package
I wind up using defined more than I should probably admit. yes it is
dangerous/confusing b/c of parse order dependencies, but it is also really
useful for a few use cases
* static resources in a defined resource type (avoids having to use classes
to store all static dependencies)
* the big reason
But this is begging for trouble:
On 01/19/2012 09:22 PM, Ashley Penney wrote:
> An example:
>
> if ! defined(Mysql_user ["${user}@${host}"]) {
> mysql_user { "${user}@${host}":
> password_hash => mysql_password($password),
> require => File["/root/.my.cnf"],
> }
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
