On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Aaron Grewell <aaron.grew...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Are we sure it can't be fixed? What makes defined() so different from > the code that implements require? Shouldn't "if not defined" be the > same as "if a require would fail"? That seems to be what people are > expecting, why not give it to them?
Never mind that last bit, it took me a second to realize the order of operations would make that Very Hard. A better question would be "do we have a proper replacement in the pipeline for Telly?" Perhaps exception handling for require? If not then something's better than nothing IMHO. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
