Announcing final release of Dashboard v1.1.1
Downloads Available:
=
Tarball:
http://www.puppetlabs.com/downloads/dashboard/puppet-dashboard-1.1.1.tar.gz
RPM:
http://www.puppetlabs.com/downloads/dashboard/puppet-dashboard-1.1.1-1.noarch.rpm
DEB:
http://www.puppetlabs.com/downloads/dashboard/p
On May 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Jim Mercer wrote:
> Is there a method to dump the full recipe for a given target?
>
> i have a node configuration which includes a bunch of stuff, some of
> which includes more stuff, or has 'requires' statements.
>
> is it possible to get a raw dump of the whole m
I extend this a bit in some of my facts to check that the gem is available
before using it. That way if the gem can't be loaded (normally because it
isn't installed), it will still return a value that I can use in the
manifests.
Facter.add("ibmim_installed_version") do
setcode do
ibmim
Is anyone currently using Puppet to manage and/or rollout Adobe FMS?
If so, I'd be interested knowing about your config, approach, etc.
I can see where the configs can be templated. Applications installed
separately (ours are complicated with configs).If you install the
base code on a local
That did the trick perfectly. I thought you always had to specify the puppet
server in the puppet URL, I didn't realize you could leave that off and have
it autodetected.
Thank you!
--
Nathan Clemons
http://www.livemocha.com
The worlds largest online language learning community
On Tue, May 17,
On 05/17/2011 09:51 AM, Calum wrote:
> On 17 May 2011 13:59, jcbollinger wrote:
>> You cannot express such a requirement directly in Puppet. You can,
>> however, write
>>
>>ensure => "latest"
>
> That will update packages that don't "need" to be updated though -
> i.e. ones that are newer th
Is there a method to dump the full recipe for a given target?
i have a node configuration which includes a bunch of stuff, some of
which includes more stuff, or has 'requires' statements.
is it possible to get a raw dump of the whole manifest, including all
the includes?
sorta like processing yo
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Christopher McCrory wrote:
> Hello...
>
> I ran into a buglet in facter 1.5.9rc6 (from tmz repo). In normal AWS
> instances it works great. In VPC instances if doesn't work. This seems
> to be because VPC instances don't use the fe:ff:ff:... MAC addresses.
Tha
Found the error:
require 'rubygems'
require 'mygem'
Facter.add("myfacter") do
setcode do
--
This works:
Facter.add("myfacter") do
require 'rubygems'
require 'mygem'
setcode do
---
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
T
require 'rubygems'
require 'yourgemname'
That should be enough. You're going to have to start giving more info
you want more help. At the very least the gem name. Sometimes you
think you're requiring the gem correctly based on the gem name, but
the thing you need to require might not match the
I'm just about to release the OpenCSW Solaris package, but it's in experimental
anyway:
http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#markp
On 27 Apr 2011, at 22:30, Jacob Helwig wrote:
> This release addresses issues with the Puppet 2.6.x series.
>
> Bug #4884:
>
> Shell exec provider that
The Type and Provider are both in the network module, which is in my module
path. I've performed an 'include network' from the cluster class which is
where I'm trying to use them. Just for grins, I also tried copying the
entire lib/puppet structure from the network module to the cluster module so
Thanks, that worked perfectly! I had no idea key and value were reserved
words.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:16 PM, yzhk...@gmail.com wrote:
> multipaths {
> <% devices.each do |key,value| -%>
> multipath {
> wwid<%= value %>
> alias <%= key %>
> }
> <% end -%
On 16 May 2011 21:05, Chris Phillips wrote:
>
>
> On 16 May 2011 20:14, Jonathan Gazeley wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> We have configured puppet to manage its own puppet.conf on clients, and to
>> ensure that puppetd is running on all hosts. However it does not manage
>> puppet.conf on the puppetma
Long delay in replying - how would I get the facter facts to the
puppet master in order to process the erb? Any cool node classifier i
might use? Scp a yaml file from the node to the puppet master? How
would I process the yaml file and the erb once there? Any tools for
that?
Thanks for the sug
On 05/17/2011 03:45 PM, Florent Paillot wrote:
> it's not cool (IMO) to use an external bash script
I sort of agree and have so far been able to meet all my ends without
relying on concat.
The bigger problem I perceive is that the number of file resources can
explode and the agent calls the filese
On 17 May 2011 13:59, jcbollinger wrote:
> You cannot express such a requirement directly in Puppet. You can,
> however, write
>
> ensure => "latest"
That will update packages that don't "need" to be updated though -
i.e. ones that are newer than 1.7.1 but not at the latest.
> package { "sud
Thank you for your answer Felix !
I took a look at the puppet-concat module.
I should be able to achieve my goal with it but it's not cool (IMO) to
use an external bash script :/ .
A type is a better solution, don't you think ?
Florent.
Hi,
On 05/17/2011 11:19 AM, Florent Paillot wrote:
On May 17, 4:56 am, Calum wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Is there a way of ensuring a package is newer than a certain version?
>
> For instance:
> sudo only supported the includedir option from around version 1.7.1,
> and I am trying to ensure that the sudo package is newer than that.
>
> However, in P
Hi,
On 05/17/2011 11:19 AM, Florent Paillot wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need a Puppet type that act like this :
>
> class1 {
>
> mytype { "name:
> command => "command = YY"
> }
> }
>
> class2 {
>
> mytype { "name":
> command => "command = XX",
> }
> }
>
>
> On the client, it gene
On 05/17/2011 03:46 AM, Nathan Clemons wrote:
> I have two puppet configurations, one for the office and one for
> production. We have some directories in common (both for files and for
> classes) using SVN externals. So the format is like:
>
> puppet-common
>* files
>* classes
> puppet-pr
Hello all,
Is there a way of ensuring a package is newer than a certain version?
For instance:
sudo only supported the includedir option from around version 1.7.1,
and I am trying to ensure that the sudo package is newer than that.
However, in Puppet 0.25.5, it doesn't appear that you can do
pa
On 2011-05-17 09:23, Martin Alfke wrote:
On 05/17/2011 08:59 AM, Nicolas Jungers wrote:
[snip]
I recreated several time the cert without problem, but the message
stayed the same. The ssl debuging of the connection indicated that the
cert where indeed correct. It turned out that when recreatin
Hi all,
I need a Puppet type that act like this :
class1 {
mytype { "name:
command => "command = YY"
}
}
class2 {
mytype { "name":
command => "command = XX",
}
}
On the client, it generate a file :
myfile.cfg
-
command = YY
command = XX
I want to purge "myf
Hello
Currently we are using Version 0.24.x on our production system. Now we
are planing to perform an upgrade. Which version do you suggest is
stable enough for production? Can I directly upgrade from 0.24 to 2.6?
Any other consideration?
BR Rene
--
You received this message because you are su
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Aaron Grewell wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to configure a set of network interfaces, so I downloaded the
> puppet-network module from the module forge. I enabled plugin sync per
> http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/plugins_in_modules.htm and added the
> module to
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Patrick Mohr wrote:
> If it's pinned like you show, will your computer upgrade to the backports
> version if you run "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade" or do you need the
> "-t"?
Well, it should upgrade to backport version, because of just
apt-get update && apt-g
If it's pinned like you show, will your computer upgrade to the backports
version if you run "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade" or do you need the
"-t"?
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:49 PM, CoolCold wrote:
> Hello!
> I have question about Debian package management with puppet. I'm
> wondering is th
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 21:27 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Dan Bode wrote:
> > [snip]
> > If there are people familiar with puppetdoc here : Is it possible to
> > > generate clean doc for my modules with only relative links to be
> > > included in the repo?
> >
> > I do not understand this questio
On 05/17/2011 08:59 AM, Nicolas Jungers wrote:
> I ran in this problem an digged the net for a while to find a solution.
>
> I have a fresh puppet install, and most nodes run fine but some exhibit
> the following error:
>
> err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: SSL_connect
> returne
I ran in this problem an digged the net for a while to find a solution.
I have a fresh puppet install, and most nodes run fine but some exhibit
the following error:
err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: SSL_connect
returned=1 errno=0 state=SSLv3 read server certificate B: certifica
31 matches
Mail list logo
