Re: [Puppet Users] Developing functions

Hello, You also have to put the function in the right place on the server, not just in: modules/mymodule/lib/puppet/parser/functions/ Try putting it in: /var/puppet/lib/puppet/parser/functions/ as well. At least this is what was required in 0.25.1 :) Regards, -Roy On 11/30/10 6:43 AM, Ma

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet meet-up in Vienna?

Yushu Yao wrote: > Wow, Portland is nice, but pretty far away. > > We should organize a meet-up of Puppet Users/Developers near Silicon > Valley :-) > > Anyone interested? Something like this? :) http://www.meetup.com/SiPMUG/calendar/15583720/ Regards James Turnbull -- Puppet Labs - http://

Re: [Puppet Users] Propagating local config changes from a client to the puppetmaster

gdb writes: > I'm using puppet with a centralized puppetmaster pushing config to many > client nodes. Most of the configuration files that puppet manages are > static and served via the puppet fileserver (running on the puppetmaster). > I often find myself making changes to a node's config file,

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet meet-up in Vienna?

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Benjamin Kite wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dan Bode wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Anyone have interest in a puppet meet-up in Vienna? I will be in the area > > for the holidays and would love to meet up with local puppet users to > chat > > about Puppet/Lin

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet meet-up in Vienna?

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dan Bode wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone have interest in a puppet meet-up in Vienna? I will be in the area > for the holidays and would love to meet up with local puppet users to chat > about Puppet/Linux and such. I am thinking about the 20th of December. > Vienna, Virg

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet meet-up in Vienna?

Wow, Portland is nice, but pretty far away. We should organize a meet-up of Puppet Users/Developers near Silicon Valley :-) Anyone interested? -Yushu +-+ | Yushu Yao | Ph:1-510-486-4690 | | Lawrence Berkeley National Lab | Mailstop 50B-6222 | 1 Cy

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet meet-up in Vienna?

Dan Bode wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Yushu Yao > wrote: > > A non-technical and non-related question: > > Where are most of the puppet developers based? I.e. where is the > headquarter of Puppet? > > > The employees are based out of P

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet meet-up in Vienna?

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Yushu Yao wrote: > A non-technical and non-related question: > > Where are most of the puppet developers based? I.e. where is the > headquarter of Puppet? > The employees are based out of Portland, Oregon Community members/contributors are spread throughout the

[Puppet Users] Number of procs

We upgraded to 2.6.3 and we've suddenly noticed two and sometimes three puppet processes running. They certainly look like forks... one process always has a long running time, while the others are short and disappear quickly. Is this normal? Is it new to this version or are we just noticing it for

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet meet-up in Vienna?

A non-technical and non-related question: Where are most of the puppet developers based? I.e. where is the headquarter of Puppet? -Yushu On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Dan Bode wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone have interest in a puppet meet-up in Vienna? I will be in the area > for the holidays and

Re: [Puppet Users] allowcdrom

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:30 AM, dragonfly wrote: > Hi, I am a new Puppet user and I have the following question.  On > Debian I created the following recipe: > > class ntpdate { > >        package { ["ntpdate"]: >                ensure => installed > } > > } > > > However, I had forgotten that my

[Puppet Users] puppet meet-up in Vienna?

Hi, Anyone have interest in a puppet meet-up in Vienna? I will be in the area for the holidays and would love to meet up with local puppet users to chat about Puppet/Linux and such. I am thinking about the 20th of December. regards, -Dan Bode -- You received this message because you are subscr

[Puppet Users] Re: DEPRECATION WARNING

I've downgraded down all the day to 2.2.3, and I'm still getting the messages: DEPRECATION WARNING: metaclass is deprecated and will be removed from Rails 2.3 (use singleton_class instead). (called from meta_eval at / usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/metaid.rb:4) i.e, gem list rails *** LO

[Puppet Users] Hashes in a definition

Hello all, I am a new user to Puppet (system and language) and have a question regarding hashes and iterating through them in a definition. What I am trying to do is specify a multi-dimensional hash on a particular node, pass this hash to a define, and recursively do "stuff" using the key/value p

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet 2.6.3 (kick.rb) error after install

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:54 AM, monte wrote: > Hello, I've just installed Ruby, Facter and Puppet from source > (versions listed below) and am getting the following error, when > trying to run Puppet 2.6.3: > > [r...@localhost puppet]# ruby --version > ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18 revision 29036) [i

[Puppet Users] puppet 2.6.3 (kick.rb) error after install

Hello, I've just installed Ruby, Facter and Puppet from source (versions listed below) and am getting the following error, when trying to run Puppet 2.6.3: [r...@localhost puppet]# ruby --version ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18 revision 29036) [i686-linux] [r...@localhost puppet]# ruby -ropenssl -e "puts

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet-dashboard ActiveRecord::Base (nil object)

This appears to be a problem with data that got stored in the database during the migration as I was able to duplicate the error on a fresh installation of 1.0.4. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email

[Puppet Users] Puppet-dashboard ActiveRecord::Base (nil object)

I found a bug from April of 2010 referencing this, though I would imagine this should be fixed by now. I'm having this problem with 1.0.4 after the upgrade. I'm going to start all over again and see if I can repeat the error; however, is this still a bug or did I mess up the installation I have?

Re: [Puppet Users] Depending on a class from a class?

On Nov 30, 2010, at 7:03 AM, Daniel Piddock wrote: > Is there any way for a class to depend on another class or for the > include statement to act more like a require? Two things here: If you're on 2.6.3 put your repositories class in a 'pre' stage, that way you eliminate putting an individual

Re: [Puppet Users] Depending on a class from a class?

On Nov 30, 2010, at 7:03 AM, Daniel Piddock wrote: > Hello, > > I fear that I have done something stupid in my manifests that requires > a redesign. To take an example: > > I have the global statement: > Package { > ensure => latest, > require => Class['repositories'], > } > > I then have a

Re: [Puppet Users] Propagating local config changes from a client to the puppetmaster

On Tuesday 30 Nov 2010 12:58:33 gdb wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using puppet with a centralized puppetmaster pushing config to > many client nodes. Most of the configuration files that puppet > manages are static and served via the puppet fileserver (running on > the puppetmaster). I often find myself

[Puppet Users] Depending on a class from a class?

Hello, I fear that I have done something stupid in my manifests that requires a redesign. To take an example: I have the global statement: Package { ensure => latest, require => Class['repositories'], } I then have a repositories module with init.pp containing: class repositories { case $

[Puppet Users] Propagating local config changes from a client to the puppetmaster

Hi, I'm using puppet with a centralized puppetmaster pushing config to many client nodes. Most of the configuration files that puppet manages are static and served via the puppet fileserver (running on the puppetmaster). I often find myself making changes to a node's config file, testing those c

[Puppet Users] allowcdrom

Hi, I am a new Puppet user and I have the following question. On Debian I created the following recipe: class ntpdate { package { ["ntpdate"]: ensure => installed } } However, I had forgotten that my sources.list contained a reference to the cdrom, so it failed. Rathe

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet replaces deleted files

On Nov 30, 2010, at 5:25 AM, Os wrote: >> As in using your operating systems package management. If you're running >> Debian/Ubuntu that'll be a .deb, if you're using RedHat/CentOS/Fedora >> that'll be a .rpm. > > Thanks for the advice, thats something I did not think about but > absolutly solv

[Puppet Users] Re: Managing a "complex" directory structure

On Nov 29, 6:15 pm, Lars Francke wrote: > This is the part I don't understand. The more verbose I've been the > more errors I got because of duplicate definitions etc. Which only > supports the point that I still don't "get" the Puppet model :) Wrapping up a bunch of things in a define may red

[Puppet Users] Re: How to handle runlevel with puppet?

On Nov 30, 2:37 am, Adriana wrote: > Hello, > I am testing puppet in order to see if it suits the needs of my > system. > I would like to specify the runlevel of a service the same way I would > do when doing > /sbin/chkconfig --level 2345 ntpd on . > I have understood that the "enable=>true" is

[Puppet Users] Developing functions

Hi, Today, while working on some functions in Puppet, I got back lots of unexpected results. Lots of times, it seemed like my changes in the code were not picked up when I re-ran the test-classes. Even functions that I removed from the code, after using them once or so, kept working after removal

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet replaces deleted files

> As in using your operating systems package management.  If you're running > Debian/Ubuntu that'll be a .deb, if you're using RedHat/CentOS/Fedora > that'll be a .rpm. Thanks for the advice, thats something I did not think about but absolutly solves my problem! Although I am a bit confused about

Re: [Puppet Users] How to apply recursion to user, group and mode?

On 11/30/2010 09:41 AM, Adriana wrote: > Hello, I would like to know it is possible to translate for example > the command > chmod -R 0777 /local. > As far as I know, I can write: > file { "/local": > mode => 0777, > recurse => true, > ensure => directory; > } > > but it does not

Re: [Puppet Users] Combine multiple CA certificates into a bundle

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Ohad Levy wrote: > I think you are facing https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3640#note-11 > > which would hopefully > be resolved in https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3770. > > I must admit that I did not have time

[Puppet Users] How to apply recursion to user, group and mode?

Hello, I would like to know it is possible to translate for example the command chmod -R 0777 /local. As far as I know, I can write: file { "/local": mode => 0777, recurse => true, ensure => directory; } but it does not apply the mode to all the /local subdirectories. Is there a

[Puppet Users] How to apply recursion to user, group and mode?

Hello, I would like to know it is possible to translate for example the command chmod -R 0777 /local. As far as I know, I can write: file { "/local": mode => 0777, recurse => true, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To pos

[Puppet Users] How to handle runlevel with puppet?

Hello, I am testing puppet in order to see if it suits the needs of my system. I would like to specify the runlevel of a service the same way I would do when doing /sbin/chkconfig --level 2345 ntpd on . I have understood that the "enable=>true" is equivalent to the chckconfig ntpd on but, how can I