On 05/21/2010 01:17 AM, James Turnbull wrote:
> On 21/05/10 1:44 PM, windowsrefund wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the tip. I never knew about this feature. I can see how
>> this might be useful but I'm looking for something that shows the
>> relationship of classes and defines rather than the resources th
On 05/21/2010 12:11 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> I'm really just not getting the whole point of external nodes. The
> more I look at it, the less I see the point.
>
> For starters, you have to pass arguments from your node back to your
> classes via what appear to be global variables, and then if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/05/10 1:45 PM, Joe McDonagh wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 07:07 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
>
>> Additionally, when variable scoping is revised and changed a lot of
>> these problems will go away. I believe that's planned for the
>> release after Rowlf.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/05/10 1:44 PM, windowsrefund wrote:
>
> Thanks for the tip. I never knew about this feature. I can see how
> this might be useful but I'm looking for something that shows the
> relationship of classes and defines rather than the resources that
>
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
> If you don't see a use, don't use the feature. However, when you have
> an issue and people suggest external nodes is the answer, you might
> consider listening.
Paul, I initially asked about a way to parse nodes files such that I
could upda
If you don't see a use, don't use the feature. However, when you have
an issue and people suggest external nodes is the answer, you might
consider listening.
-Paul
On Thursday, May 20, 2010, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> I'm really just not getting the whole point of external nodes. The
> more I loo
I'm really just not getting the whole point of external nodes. The
more I look at it, the less I see the point.
For starters, you have to pass arguments from your node back to your
classes via what appear to be global variables, and then if you have
multiple instances of a specific piece of softwa
On 05/11/2010 07:07 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
> Additionally, when variable scoping is revised and changed a lot of
> these problems will go away. I believe that's planned for the
> release after Rowlf.
>
> Regards
>
> James Turnbull
>
So, variable scoping... will these changes make it possib
Thanks for the tip. I never knew about this feature. I can see how
this might be useful but I'm looking for something that shows the
relationship of classes and defines rather than the resources that
result from their use.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
where [1] is the much newer and better version for that one.
cheers pete
[1] http://git.cmaisonneuve.qc.ca/?p=puppet/module-nagios;a=summary
Thanks, this looks great!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Users" group.
To post to this group, se
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:44 PM, windowsrefund wrote:
>
>
> >
> > you mean like "puppetd --graph" to produce dot files?
> >
>
> --graph doesn't seem to be valid. Can you elaborate?
>
Add --graph to your run however you invoke it (it needs something to graph),
like:
sudo puppetd --test --graph
t
>
> you mean like "puppetd --graph" to produce dot files?
>
--graph doesn't seem to be valid. Can you elaborate?
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To u
>
> you mean like "puppetd --graph" to produce dot files?
>
--graph doesn't seem to be valid. Can you elaborate?
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To u
* Does anyone have experience with puppet in the cloud?
There really is no such thing as "the cloud". It's just the latest
buzz phrase used to describe... networked computers.
I actually agree with you :) But it's the term used to reference Rackspace
and Amazon virtualization platform, so I
> * Does anyone have experience with puppet in the cloud?
There really is no such thing as "the cloud". It's just the latest
buzz phrase used to describe... networked computers.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this
>
> That makes sense, but do you then manage your puppetmaster via puppet as a
> normal client from then on? It would make me nervous.
>
I'm a big fan of this. I have several pieces carved out in my puppet
module including:
puppet::client - installs and manages the puppet client
puppet::master
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:34 PM, windowsrefund wrote:
> Despite taking great care to keep my manifests clean and logical, my
> code is growing both in size and complexity. That said, I'm starting
> to wonder if there are any tools I can use that would run through my
> entire tree and display some
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
> In this situation, the problem you need to address isn't Puppet, it's
> your infrastructure. The infrastructure you describe is going to be
> nuts to manage no matter what set of tools you are trying to use. It
> doesn't make the tools deficie
> Too bad that Dan (Bode) is not in the bunch... :-)
+1 to that.
ken.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-use
Despite taking great care to keep my manifests clean and logical, my
code is growing both in size and complexity. That said, I'm starting
to wonder if there are any tools I can use that would run through my
entire tree and display some user friendly map showing the
relationships between all the cla
In this situation, the problem you need to address isn't Puppet, it's
your infrastructure. The infrastructure you describe is going to be
nuts to manage no matter what set of tools you are trying to use. It
doesn't make the tools deficient.
Basically, if you build your house on a swamp, don't comp
exactly what I needed. Thanks much Ken.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Ken Barber wrote:
> Regular expressions - even better:
>
>
> http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/language_tutorial.html#matching_nodes_with_regular_expressions
>
> Also - what you probably want to look at is using classes fo
Douglas Garstang writes:
> > classes: [ ]
> > parameters: { }
> >
> > So if you need different Apache versions on two different nodes, your
> > node classifier could supply this for node1:
> >
> > classes: [ apache-server ]
> > parameters: { apache_version=2.0.63 }
> >
> > and this for
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Steven VanDevender wrote:
> Douglas Garstang writes:
> > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Paul Lathrop
> wrote:
> > > You are getting a bunch of misguided answers to this. I'm also
> > > perplexed by your assertion that external nodes requires you to write
>
Douglas Garstang writes:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
> > You are getting a bunch of misguided answers to this. I'm also
> > perplexed by your assertion that external nodes requires you to write
> > custom scripts to parse node manifests.
> >
> > No, you cannot put
On May 20, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Tim Stoop wrote:
>
>
> On 20 mei, 17:26, Patrick wrote:
>> What are you trying to do with the onlyif? If that works in augtool, and
>> that's what you want, just remove the onlyif.
>
> Without the onlyif, I'm still getting the error:
>
> debug: Augeas[dummy -
Regular expressions - even better:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/language_tutorial.html#matching_nodes_with_regular_expressions
Also - what you probably want to look at is using classes for your
'templates':
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/language_tutorial.html#classes
ken.
On May 20, 8
Jon Charette wrote:
I'd like to setup node templates for a variety of developer VMs that we
are looking to manage through puppet.
This may be in the documentation already, and if so, I apologize for
missing it, but is it possible to use wildcards within the node definition.
Yes, it is.
--
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
> You are getting a bunch of misguided answers to this. I'm also
> perplexed by your assertion that external nodes requires you to write
> custom scripts to parse node manifests.
>
> No, you cannot put resources directly into nodes when you are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> While I haven't used them (yet?), there are a few modules available on
> github that provide the ability to declare unmanaged hosts. Here's an
> example, but not the only one:
>
> http://github.com/duritong/puppet-nagios
>
where [1] is the much n
I'm running into an issue trying to do something like the following:
class test {
file {"test":
content => template('mytemplate1','mytemplate2'),
}
}
class test::test2 inherits test {
File["test"] { content +> template('mytemplate3'), }
}
So, basically I want the inherited class to tack on
Ok, I've got a repository of configuration files I use for my Linux
environment and would like to leverage this with Puppet (instead of
having dupes in my /module/*/files folder).
So, I've put symbolic links in the files folder pointing to the actual
config file. I'm receiving a "Failed to retrieve
I'd like to setup node templates for a variety of developer VMs that we are
looking to manage through puppet.
This may be in the documentation already, and if so, I apologize for missing
it, but is it possible to use wildcards within the node definition.
I'd like to do something like this:
Hostn
On 20 mei, 17:26, Patrick wrote:
> What are you trying to do with the onlyif? If that works in augtool, and
> that's what you want, just remove the onlyif.
Without the onlyif, I'm still getting the error:
debug: Augeas[dummy - cron-apt change mailon](provider=augeas):
Opening augeas with roo
I've setup something where I put a grants file in the data directory
of each database:
remotefile {"$db_datadir/grants":
mode => 500,
source => "db/$db_name/data/grants",
require => File["${db_datadir}"],
notify => Exec["refresh_${db_name}"]
On May 20, 2010, at 5:56 AM, Patrick wrote:
> We would like to roll out several clients with puppet. I want to make sure
> that the clients can run a long time (~years) without requiring me to login.
> Reason: It would be hard to get access to this machines as they are far away
> from my site.
On May 20, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Tim Stoop wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to do fairly simple stuff with augeas, like:
>
> augeas { "cronapt - mailon":
> context => "/files/etc/cron-apt/config",
> changes => "set MAILON upgrade",
> onlyif => "match MAILON != ['upgrade']",
> }
>
> This works i
> A Nagios server on each monitored host?
> And this should scale better than NRPE?
>
> I really cannot believe that this is the "intended" usage.
> This kind of seems to reverse the usual Nagios monitoring from a
> mainly polling to an entirely pushing scheme.
> I so far only monitor abt. 400 host
Hi Ken
On May 19, 6:23 pm, Ken wrote:
>
> As a complete diversion from your issue - I ended up moving away from
> NRPE in the end and used distributed nagios servers on each box.
> This was purely for scaling reasons due to NRPE tests holding up resources
> on the server.
A Nagios server on each
Hi all,
I'm trying to do fairly simple stuff with augeas, like:
augeas { "cronapt - mailon":
context => "/files/etc/cron-apt/config",
changes => "set MAILON upgrade",
onlyif => "match MAILON != ['upgrade']",
}
This works if I try it from the commandline:
t...@puppet-test.db:~$ sudo augto
On May 19, 6:05 pm, Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Matt Juszczak writes:
> > * Nagios: What are people doing to add hosts/services to nagios where
> > some hosts AREN'T puppet hosts? For instance, deprecated hosts that
> > were spun up prior to puppet (we won't be installing puppet on tho
We would like to roll out several clients with puppet. I want to make sure
that the clients can run a long time (~years) without requiring me to
login.
Reason: It would be hard to get access to this machines as they are
far away from my site. The clients would also not always be connected to
th
I hope you are not literally using puppet.example.com
On May 19, 2010 9:13 PM, "mathie" wrote:
Hello,
I would like to manage configs for the server that is also the
puppetmaster. I declare a simple node (just write out a file) and ran
this:
puppetd --test --graph -w 10 --server puppetmaster.ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2010 03:03 AM, mathie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to manage configs for the server that is also the
> puppetmaster. I declare a simple node (just write out a file) and ran
> this:
>
> puppetd --test --graph -w 10 --server puppetmaster.e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> So I just upgraded my master from 0.24.8 to 0.25.4. Apparently there
> is some bug with the EPEL version of rails that results in mysql "too
> many connections" with stored configs, so I just bailed from the
> packaged stuff and went to a standalone
On 19 May 2010 21:17, Peter Berghold wrote:
> I thought that as well, but didn't really want to just yet.
>
> If I go that route I guess it will mean I'll have to get around to doing
> something I've been putting off.. I've been planning to build a custom yum
> repository but that was not going
Every body does it now and then - hehehe :-). Its a shame we need to
use different interpreters to get things working in the first place
really. Lets hope in time this ruby deployment fiasco becomes cleaner.
ken.
On May 20, 1:07 am, Chad Huneycutt wrote:
> Thanks for sanity check, Ken. I just c
47 matches
Mail list logo
