Hi,
After reading the thread, to me it sounds like a problem foreman can solve.
Cheers,
Ohad
On 2/2/10, John Lyman wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out the best way to achieve the following...
>
> Inside of each node definition, I have variables for ip address,
> default router, dns server, etc.
No need to apologize; thanks for the help. I'll look into extlookup.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users
Am Tuesday 02 February 2010 schrieb mir Michael DeHaan:
> Oliver Schad wrote:
> > Is there a tool outside where I can use puppet descriptions to
> > program such jobs? Or is there a tool outside you know, that allows
> > me to program network wide jobs without puppet where I could built in
> > the
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:27 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
> > Next thing you know we'll need a rules engine and an artificial
> > intelligence.
> >
> > Yeah, we don't want to go there. But multinode deployment? Yes, we
> > want to go there.
>
> I think that's a great idea in principle, with several p
Oh, I apologize. After re-reading your original post I see you clearly stated
that. You'll have to use extlookup:
http://blog.klavsen.info/content/extlookup-puppet-extension-you-cant-live-without
You can make two calls to get the ipaddress, once in the classes and once in
your node definitio
> You could use stored configs and collect all the values for all the hosts on
> all the hosts.
This won't work in my case because I need the value from a host
*before* the host actually has puppet installed and running.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
You're right. Should have spent some more minutes thinking about it.
It's been a long day...
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
>>
>> Why not create a class or define containing your keys and run puppetd
>> only with the related tag? This would only install your ce
Hi everyone!!
I have noticed that if I am managing gem files with puppet ensuring a
specific version and the system has the gem 2 versions of that gem
installed, including the version that I am managing, puppet doesn't identify
that I have that gem installed.
For example:
package { fastt
Daniel wrote:
Why not create a class or define containing your keys and run puppetd
only with the related tag? This would only install your certificates
but it requires you pre-generate the keys and certs on the
puppetmaster.
Without the private key, a certificate is useless. :( Also, how will
Why not create a class or define containing your keys and run puppetd
only with the related tag? This would only install your certificates
but it requires you pre-generate the keys and certs on the
puppetmaster.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Neil Prockter wrote:
> Hello
>
> I often configure a
You could use stored configs and collect all the values for all the hosts on
all the hosts. So something like this:
node foo { ipaddress = 1.2.3.4 }
node bar { ipaddress = 5.6.7.8 }
class jumpstart {
@@file{ "/etc/sysidcfg.d/$hostname":
content => template("sysidcfg.erb"),
ta
Just added my company. Tried this before but it seems like Trac had
problems sending me my confirmation mail...
I'll write a Testimonial as soon as i have some free time.
On Feb 3, 5:22 pm, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We have a "WhosUsingPuppet" page up here:
>
> http://reductivelab
Oops. Looks like I jumped the gun. I have to get approval from the higher ups
so I've removed our entry for now. I'm sure they'll approve it so we can get
it back up soon.
On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Carl Caum wrote:
> Sweet. Just added my company. I'll do a testimonial when I have more t
On 2/3/10 12:11 AM, Neil Prockter wrote:
Hello
I often configure a new node that I want to be the same as an existing one.
However I'd like to run puppetd with --noop just the once to double
check the changes (I'm still responsible for them after all)
Trouble is on a new node the keys etc aren
There are companies such as the one I am contracting at do not want their
names to appear on a website or a mailing list unless agreed by the public
relations people, although Puppet may have been doing wonders for them.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Michael DeHaan
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We
Sounds good. Just added my company. I'll do a testimonial when I have more
time.
On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We have a "WhosUsingPuppet" page up here:
>
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/WhosUsingPuppet
>
> However, while this mailing list
> Next thing you know we'll need a rules engine and an artificial
> intelligence.
>
> Yeah, we don't want to go there. But multinode deployment? Yes, we
> want to go there.
I think that's a great idea in principle, with several potential
pitfalls. Do you have specific ideas about what capabili
Hi Everyone,
We have a "WhosUsingPuppet" page up here:
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/WhosUsingPuppet
However, while this mailing list has 1600+ people on it (excellent!) we
have only about 100 on the user page. We'd love to have you listed up
there! (Note: eventually I really
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Jesús Couto wrote:
> Wouldnt this tie up with things like Puppet+Capistrano, Puppet+ControlTier,
> and such, that was pointed to me when asking about application deployment?
>
If by "tie up" you mean being able to do some of the same things, indeed
yes.
However
Wouldnt this tie up with things like Puppet+Capistrano, Puppet+ControlTier,
and such, that was pointed to me when asking about application deployment?
--
Jesús Couto F.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
On Feb 2, 2:14 pm, nicholas wrote:
> def self.ca?
> return false unless Puppet[:ca]
> return false unless Puppet[:name] == "puppetmasterd"
> return true
> end
[...]
> Basically I read this as, if this class is used inside of
> puppetmasterd, then turn on the ce
> The latter case - if you set syslogfacility you don't get any log
> output to syslog at all?
Only if I set it to nothing (i.e. "syslogfacility =" with no value).
This is probably expected behavior, but I thought that maybe the
syslogfacility needed to be turned off for puppetdlog to work.
--
Y
Am Wednesday 03 February 2010 schrieb mir James Cammarata:
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:25:35 -0800, Scott Smith wrote:
> > On 2/2/10 8:18 PM, James Cammarata wrote:
> >> Symlinks wouldn't work, I'd just make them shell scripts.
> >
> > Wait, what? Checking $0 and loading client, server or doc code wo
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:25:35 -0800, Scott Smith wrote:
> On 2/2/10 8:18 PM, James Cammarata wrote:
>>
>> Symlinks wouldn't work, I'd just make them shell scripts.
>>
>
> Wait, what? Checking $0 and loading client, server or doc code would work
> just fine. :)
>
> -scott
Heh yeah, you're right,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/02/10 5:14 AM, John Lyman wrote:
> I am trying to log to a file instead of syslog, but when I set
> "puppetdlog = /var/log/puppetd.log", it still logs to syslog. If also
> set "syslogfacility =", it doesn't log anywhere.
The latter case - if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/02/10 5:14 AM, John Lyman wrote:
> I am trying to log to a file instead of syslog, but when I set
> "puppetdlog = /var/log/puppetd.log", it still logs to syslog. If also
> set "syslogfacility =", it doesn't log anywhere.
>
> Does this work for a
On 3 February 2010 21:04, Julian Simpson wrote:
Can we start by grafting together everyone's modules and trying to
namespace them?
Has there been any discussion of bundling some common modules in the
puppet distribution? It might help people get up to speed faster.
I don't think we'd want
>> Can we start by grafting together everyone's modules and trying to
>> namespace them?
Has there been any discussion of bundling some common modules in the
puppet distribution? It might help people get up to speed faster.
--
Julian Simpson
Software Build and Deployment
http://www.build-doctor
I'm building modules for the various web services I manage and I'm
running into trouble in defining the dependencies. For example, two
of my services require the same Apache module. If I define the
package resource in both modules and then try to include them both on
a single node, I get a "Dupl
Hello
I often configure a new node that I want to be the same as an existing one.
However I'd like to run puppetd with --noop just the once to double
check the changes (I'm still responsible for them after all)
Trouble is on a new node the keys etc aren't there and running as noop
they don't get
30 matches
Mail list logo
