-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vince,
If you really want to do this, I would do the first scenario you
describe with a few key points.
1) Let puppet run
2) Have an exec in puppet that runs a job in the background that does
the following:
- Waits until all puppet instances have f
We just starting using samhain on our servers.
Since updates to our puppet manifests tend to change files on the
system that samhain monitors, I'm looking for a good way to
reinitialize the samhain database whenever puppet changes something on
the system to reduce notifications that samhain produc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think that the issue is that the define isn't actually scoped under
the class, so the inherit doesn't pick up that the file is actually
under that class at all. Does that make sense?
Try writing the same statement but move the defines outside of th
Hello all,
First, I would like to thank you for your suggestion about an 'if/case'
statement. I think that should do what I want. However, I would think
that even if defines are scoped separately from classes, that wouldn't
necessarily apply in the case that I outlined below since I used a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So, I believe (someone please correct me if I'm wrong) that defines are
actually separately scoped from the classes that contain them and cannot
currently be overridden.
The nesting that you have below is merely a convenience for writing:
define test
Hello all,
Suppose you have a resource that is created with a define such as the
following:
class test {
define myfile () {
file {
"/tmp/$name":
content => generate("/bin/echo","$name");
}
}
myfile {
"foo":
}
}
And it turns
I have a couple questions on the Dashboard:
1) It seems to assume anyone who can register an account should be able
to modify nodes, etc. Is there a way to create roles? I checked the
users table but didn't see anything obvious.
2) Is there a way to add nodes programmatically?
-scott
--
You
You know, this usually means that you don't have these settings in
your puppet.conf, as doc'ed:
Required puppet.conf settings:
[puppetmasterd]
ssl_client_header = SSL_CLIENT_S_DN
ssl_client_verify_header = SSL_CLIENT_VERIFY
-ch
On Jan 8, 7:30 pm, jb wrote:
> Thank you Silviu - I just
Thank you Silviu - I just went through a 0.25.2 installation using
passenger 2.2.8 just yesterday and had the same issues which started
this thread:
puppetmasterd[29797]: Puppet Server (Rack): Internal Server Error:
Unhandled Exception: "Host app3.chassis1 10.x.x.x) not authorized to
call fileserv
Yeah, I really don't want to patch puppet. (It's harder for me to
maintain local patches for future upgrades). Is this something that will
make it upstream?
well if a ticket is opened about the issue, the patch is sent to the
-dev list and get accepted it will make it upstream. but somebody ha
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Kenneth Holter wrote:
> Do you mean running puppetmaster on different linux servers? It would
> probably be the best solution, but I do think I prefer running multiple
> puppetmasters on one linux server if possible.. How are other people
> testing new puppetmasters?
>
> On
Discussion of Puppet usage and community
=
page:http://www.123maza.com/website-designing/businesz
=
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
T
Check out
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ReleaseNotes#deprecations
The short answer is rename module/plugins to module/libs. About module
naming there is a thread on the list started by a...@lab42 if you wish I
can give you a link. Aside from that nothing I know. PuppetBestPractice
Kenneth Holter wrote:
Do you mean running puppetmaster on different linux servers? It would
probably be the best solution, but I do think I prefer running multiple
puppetmasters on one linux server if possible.. How are other people
testing new puppetmasters?
What?! You mean your puppetmast
James Turnbull writes:
> seph wrote:
>> Hi all. My particular environment doesn't allow most of the machines to
>> make direct external connections, so I send a lot of things through
>> proxies. And now, I'm trying to figure out how to use puppet to install
>> gems, via proxy.
>
> John Ferlito h
Do you mean running puppetmaster on different linux servers? It would
probably be the best solution, but I do think I prefer running multiple
puppetmasters on one linux server if possible.. How are other people testing
new puppetmasters?
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
> Kenn
> can you recreate with
>
> #>puppetd --test --debug --trace
>
> then post the output
I don't have a debug trace, but I can tell you that I switched from
webrick to mongrel with nginx and my problem went away.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet U
> Hmm, I'm not really a fan of such a return type thing. My proposal would
> be to have the old behavior (return a string) and then if somebody
> really rather likes an array in different places, they could write a
> wrapper method which would split the string for them.
+1
Well I think eventually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> Ok, some more data from git history:
>> http://github.com/reductivelabs/facter/commit/33fb7709404e706801683e6c47ab7a0a5a1884b1
>
>> It looks like "return an array" is new behavior for exec, and maybe it
>> wasn't backported/tested for all of the ol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> What should the structure now be / where should i be moving things to
> (just rename plugins to lib seems like what's implied but ... i'm
> apprehensive :) )
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ReleaseNotes#deprecations
so it is just renaming
20 matches
Mail list logo
