On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:47:53PM -0700, Tim Harper wrote:
>
> I want to run puppet in the cloud. The trouble is, the fqdn fact is
> quite random and looks something like "domU-12-32-19-01-B8-D1".
>
> I'm OK with deploying the cert pair and configuring puppetd to use the
> same cert on every b
On Dec 22, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Tim Harper wrote:
> When I boot up a fresh image, I'd like it to apply the "general"
> configuration. Then, I'm going to save the image for future use.
>
> Later, I'm when I boot up one of the more specialized machines (like
> www-server), I'd like it to restore t
On Dec 22, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Tim Harper wrote:
> That's half of the battle. The other half is getting the puppet
> master to select the appropriate node configuration.
>
> I'd like to create the following nodes:
>
> general
> |- www-server
> |- db-server
> |- sb-server
> |- memcache-server
>
>
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Tim Harper wrote:
>
>>
>> I want to run puppet in the cloud. The trouble is, the fqdn fact is
>> quite random and looks something like "domU-12-32-19-01-B8-D1".
>>
>> I'm OK with deploying the cert pair
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Tim Harper wrote:
>
> I want to run puppet in the cloud. The trouble is, the fqdn fact is
> quite random and looks something like "domU-12-32-19-01-B8-D1".
>
> I'm OK with deploying the cert pair and configuring puppetd to use the
> same cert on every box. Howev
I want to run puppet in the cloud. The trouble is, the fqdn fact is
quite random and looks something like "domU-12-32-19-01-B8-D1".
I'm OK with deploying the cert pair and configuring puppetd to use the
same cert on every box. However, I need to be able to select which
node configuration in the
Russ Allbery wrote:
> gary writes:
>
>> Anyone try to extend puppet-mode for emacs? I'm trying to figure out
>> how to get tags working as well as code completion and snippets
>> (snippets.el). Just getting started and my Elisp is not so great. :)
>> Maybe others have given this a start? I'd be h
gary writes:
> Anyone try to extend puppet-mode for emacs? I'm trying to figure out
> how to get tags working as well as code completion and snippets
> (snippets.el). Just getting started and my Elisp is not so great. :)
> Maybe others have given this a start? I'd be happy to submit a patch
> ag
Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> Probably because I'm used to cfengine, where all the master does is
> send the files to the clients that then do what the files say.
>
> I gather that's not how Puppet works, but looking at
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/BigPicture
> and http://reductivelabs.
Hi
>> Pay attention to the fact that inheritance in nodes is slightly
>> different than in classes. The Best thing imho is to build such
>> inheritance in the classes itself and leave any inheritance out of
>> the node definitions.
>
> Can you explain that in a bit more detail?
Some of that I e
Hello puppet-users.
I have a really strange problem since some days.
puppetmasterd is 0.24.5-2 (Debian etch)
puppetd are 0.24.4 (Ubuntu hardy desktop/server), 0.24.5-2 (Debian
etch), 0.24.5 (Darwin, 10.5.[56], Darwin 10.4 Server)
I have a class:
class ikw::sge::exechost {
include sge::sub
On Dec 22, 1:34 pm, Adam Jacob wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2008, at 4:49 AM, Eric Singer wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm the UNIX systems administrator at the company I work for and we're
> > in the planning stage of setting up LDAP and Puppet servers. For
> > high availability we're current thinking ab
On Dec 22, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Carl Caum
> wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Carl Caum
>> wrote:
>> Most plist management can be done with the defaults command.
So for future reference, it turns out system profiler (GUI or command line)
is somewhat broken in VMWare with OS X Server.
It doesn't report any hardware info at all, and spews to stderr for
SPHardwareDataType and SPMemoryDataType.
There's a simple enough workaround that I'll test before patching
For testing you could edit the facter ruby code to return hardcoded
values instead of running system profiler. I think it just adds
everything to a hash then prefixes it with 'sp' if I remember
correctly. I've edited ours to return other data.
Kyle
On Dec 22, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Carl Caum wr
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:21:23PM -0600, Evan Hisey wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Robin Lee Powell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:40:05AM +0100, Peter Meier wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> > Debug output of the client run follows. No, I didn't update the
> >> > master;
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:08:44PM +0100, Peter Meier wrote:
>
> Pay attention to the fact that inheritance in nodes is slightly
> different than in classes. The Best thing imho is to build such
> inheritance in the classes itself and leave any inheritance out of
> the node definitions.
Can you e
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Robin Lee Powell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:40:05AM +0100, Peter Meier wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> > Debug output of the client run follows. No, I didn't update the
>> > master; why would I do that? This is about functionality on the
>> > client, not the ma
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:40:05AM +0100, Peter Meier wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> > Debug output of the client run follows. No, I didn't update the
> > master; why would I do that? This is about functionality on the
> > client, not the master. Is it actually necessary that the
> > *master* have Augeas
On Dec 22, 2008, at 4:49 AM, Eric Singer wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm the UNIX systems administrator at the company I work for and we're
> in the planning stage of setting up LDAP and Puppet servers. For
> high availability we're current thinking about dedicating two of our
> lower end Linux servers fo
Ok, yeah. That's what I was thinking. I can't test this on physical
hardware since both our physical XServes are in production. I'll see
if I can get a mac mini ordered.
On Dec 22, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Crawford Kyle wrote:
> Is the client running on Mac hardware and not in a VM? Seems like
On Dec 22, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Carl Caum
> wrote:
> Most plist management can be done with the defaults command. It
> means we exec out everytime, but we could write a definition/plugin
> around it.
>
> It also has the sometimes u
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Carl Caum wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Carl Caum wrote:
>
>> Most plist management can be done with the defaults command. It means we
>> exec out everytime, but we could write a definition
Is the client running on Mac hardware and not in a VM? Seems like
system_profiler, which is used to generate default facts is failing.
Maybe it doesn't work because of virtual hardware.
On Dec 22, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Carl Caum wrote:
> Most plist management can be done with the defaults com
On Dec 22, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Carl Caum
> wrote:
> Most plist management can be done with the defaults command. It
> means we exec out everytime, but we could write a definition/plugin
> around it.
>
> It also has the sometimes u
Hello,
- "Todd Zullinger" wrote:
> Is there a problem caused, other than the loss of a few kb of disk
> space, by requiring ruby-augeas?
Clearly that is a non issue.
The issue is I'd like to choose when I put beta quality software on my systems
and not some arbitrary inflated requires fr
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Carl Caum wrote:
> Most plist management can be done with the defaults command. It means we
> exec out everytime, but we could write a definition/plugin around it.
>
It also has the sometimes undesirable side effect of converting all your
xml1 property lists to
Most plist management can be done with the defaults command. It means
we exec out everytime, but we could write a definition/plugin around it.
I'm having trouble getting puppet to run on OS X. I installed 0.24.7
on my OS X server VM using gems. After signing the certificate on the
puppetm
R.I.Pienaar wrote:
> There are also> 10 nagios types, yet we don't install nagios on
> every server, it can manage k5 stuff, yet we don't force that on
> everyone. We install it where we need it. Puppet *requires* ruby,
> it does not require augeas or nagios.
The size of pulling in nagios versus
OK, just playing around with it so far, but I think this will work.
I'm setting up a virtual machine to test it on right now. Tell me if
you think this is a good approach:
define authentication::ldap($server, $binddn, $bindpasswd, $adminuser
= "", $adminpass = "", $domain = "", $workgroup
2008/12/22 RijilV
>
> Since puppet doesn't have a concept of producers and consumers (or master
> and slaves) already, I would suggest against working yourself into that
> mindset with respect to scalability - view it as a clustered service and go
> from there.
>
Er what I ment to write was 'sin
Deadline: 6:00 PM EASTERN - December 23
You can read what the journalist is looking for. If you are interested, let
me know.
Query:
"For the blogs at VoIP-News, IT Management and Daily Wireless, I am
looking for stories about how technology has benefited your company
in 2008. I am most interes
2008/12/22 James Turnbull
> Eric Singer wrote:
> > both servers should be Puppet Master servers as well. One server
> > being primary and the other is seconday which is ready to pick up
> > incase the other fails.
> >
>
> The only documentation I know of is:
>
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/pu
Hello,
- "Peter Meier" wrote:
>
> well in .7 there is now an augeas type which uses ruby-augeas.
> So where to draw the line? When is a new type an additional but
> optional
> feature?
>
There are also > 10 nagios types, yet we don't install nagios on every server,
it can manage k5 stuf
R.I.Pienaar wrote:
> What is the rationale for the ruby-augeas requirement? Nothing in
> puppet *requires* it, surely it's an optional extra that unlocks
> some additional but optional features, it seems to be a completely
> bogus over statement of the requirements.
Just as ruby-shadow is an optio
Hello,
- "Bryan Kearney" wrote:
> > It used to be that EPEL packages were useful, this addition of beta
> quality software as a requirement changes that unfortunately.
>
>
> Yes, the requirement for ruby-augeas is optional.
Yet the EPEL RPM lists it in the Requires? so that means the EPEL
Hi
> What is the rationale for the ruby-augeas requirement? Nothing in
> puppet *requires* it, surely it's an optional extra that unlocks some
> additional but optional features, it seems to be a completely bogus
> over statement of the requirements.
well in .7 there is now an augeas type which
R.I.Pienaar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> - "Todd Zullinger" wrote:
>
>> windowsrefund wrote:
>>> Are they out there somewhere? I don't see anything on EPEL.
>> They'll be in epel-testing as soon as the next push is done.
>>
>> You could grab puppet and ruby-augeas from:
>> http://buildsys.fedoraproj
Hello,
- "Todd Zullinger" wrote:
> windowsrefund wrote:
> > Are they out there somewhere? I don't see anything on EPEL.
>
> They'll be in epel-testing as soon as the next push is done.
>
> You could grab puppet and ruby-augeas from:
> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/success
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:54 AM, James Turnbull wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Eric Singer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm the UNIX systems administrator at the company I work for and we're
> > in the planning stage of setting up LDAP and Puppet servers. For
> > high avail
Thank you
On Dec 22, 10:45 am, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> windowsrefund wrote:
> > Are they out there somewhere? I don't see anything on EPEL.
>
> They'll be in epel-testing as soon as the next push is done.
>
> You could grab puppet and ruby-augeas
> from:http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-s
Hi,
On Dec 22, 4:41 pm, "Evan Hisey" wrote:
> Fred-
>
> > Does the default node apply to all nodes, including those with their
> > own node entry or only nodes without an explicit node entry? That is,
> > will I need to make the "freebsd-box" explicitly inherit the "default"
> > node?
>
> The an
windowsrefund wrote:
> Are they out there somewhere? I don't see anything on EPEL.
They'll be in epel-testing as soon as the next push is done.
You could grab puppet and ruby-augeas from:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/success.psp if you
didn't want to wait another day or two. I
Fred-
> Does the default node apply to all nodes, including those with their
> own node entry or only nodes without an explicit node entry? That is,
> will I need to make the "freebsd-box" explicitly inherit the "default"
> node?
>
The answer as stated in
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wik
Are they out there somewhere? I don't see anything on EPEL.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fro
Hi
> This does indeed make sense and yes, you will need to 'inherit' the
> default node to have other nodes apply the settings.
well actually you have to inherit the unix class, that you overwrite the
parameters.
Pay attention to the fact that inheritance in nodes is slightly
different than in c
Fred,
This does indeed make sense and yes, you will need to 'inherit' the
default node to have other nodes apply the settings.
Trevor
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:22, Fred Clausen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are making an initial, small scale Puppet deployment to test Puppet
> and also to learn mor
Hello,
We are making an initial, small scale Puppet deployment to test Puppet
and also to learn more of how Puppet can be used in our environment.
My question is regarding the default node and how it applies when a
defined node connects - this is perhaps best explained with a few
examples, to st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Singer wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm the UNIX systems administrator at the company I work for and we're
> in the planning stage of setting up LDAP and Puppet servers. For
> high availability we're current thinking about dedicating two of our
> lower end L
Hi,
I'm the UNIX systems administrator at the company I work for and we're
in the planning stage of setting up LDAP and Puppet servers. For
high availability we're current thinking about dedicating two of our
lower end Linux servers for the LDAP implementation and I'm thinking
both servers shoul
whats the last line you see in your puppet logfiles?
I would guess its an exec or similar
Ohad
On 12/22/08, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a strange problem with running puppet as a daemon. I set it up in
> config to wake up every 15 min and looks like it every time spawns httpd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Meier wrote:
> well the master has to compile the manifest with all it's dependencies
> and it will send the evaluated manifest down to the client. IMHO
> therefore it have to know the new type.
> However I might be wrong, but afair there is any
Hi
> Debug output of the client run follows. No, I didn't update the
> master; why would I do that? This is about functionality on the
> client, not the master. Is it actually necessary that the *master*
> have Augeas when it never uses it?
well the master has to compile the manifest with all
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Peter Meier wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> > I've installed augeas-0.3.4, facter-1.5.2, and puppet-0.24.7
> > from their respective tarballs. I've installed
> > ruby-augeas-0.2.0.gem. All of these things seem to work, but no
> > matter what I do:
> >
> > err: Could
Hello,
Anyone try to extend puppet-mode for emacs? I'm trying to figure out
how to get tags working as well as code completion and snippets
(snippets.el). Just getting started and my Elisp is not so great. :)
Maybe others have given this a start? I'd be happy to submit a patch
against puppet-mode
Hi
> I've installed augeas-0.3.4, facter-1.5.2, and puppet-0.24.7 from
> their respective tarballs. I've installed ruby-augeas-0.2.0.gem.
> All of these things seem to work, but no matter what I do:
>
> err: Could not retrieve catalog: Could not find resource type augeas
> at /etc/puppet/manife
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:18:25AM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a strange problem with running puppet as a daemon. I set it up in
> config to wake up every 15 min and looks like it every time spawns httpd
> process that becomes zombie, so after some time I see a long list of
>
57 matches
Mail list logo
