Those files are exactly the same before and after puppet. Same time,
same checksum.
I tried to run puppet just with cron instruction, same problem.
On 18 nov, 17:43, martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A couple of questions:
> 1) what does passwd look like before and after puppet
> 2) what does
On Nov 18, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Crawford Kyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Nov 15, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>>
>>> so I'm particularly interested to hear what the
>>> major conceptual stumbling blocks were for ge
"Paul Lathrop" writes:
>> Unfortunately, this leaves the seed file, required only for the command
>> to run, lying around on disk. Now, I can protect the file with mode
>> 0400, or I can tidy it with a dependency on the exec command, but what
>> I really want is something like "refreshonly" for f
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:22 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> - you want to install via a custom installer an application, so you
>>> need to do the following:
>>> 1. copy the file and installer over
>>> 2. run installer and cleanup
>>
>>Well, myself I'd package the application in the nati
>> - you want to install via a custom installer an application, so you
>> need to do the following:
>> 1. copy the file and installer over
>> 2. run installer and cleanup
>
>Well, myself I'd package the application in the native package format,
>but I'm a bit crazy.
Take another example, then.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Paul Lathrop") writes:
>> Still, I think you'll get more mileage out of telling us what problem
>> you are trying to solve so we can help you figure out the best way to
>> solve that problem within the P
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this correct? or is better to just include all *pp files in manifest
> dir?
It is a really good idea to start using modules from the very beginning.
> My other question, is posible to add some "dependencies" between
> im
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:23:21PM -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Leon Meßner wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > i'm relatively new to puppet and to this list and have a problem
> > configuring puppet for using ldap nodes. I have a very basic testing
> > setup on FreeBSD7_0 using p
(This is somewhat awkwardly on both lists; is everyone ok moving it to
-dev?)
On Nov 18, 2008, at 6:48 AM, Ceri Storey wrote:
> [snipped description of state-based change control]
> I suppose what I'm asking, is firstly, is anyone else doing anything
> like this themselves? I imagine someone mu
I tried it on a whim and I had to have the groups option set for the user
even if I didn't want him to belong to groups beyond his primary group. So I
did something like this.
user { "arnaubria":
ensure => present,
gid=> "31401",
home => "/nfs/pic.es/user/a/a
"Kurt Bendlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Funny. Using the following script from the
> wiki(http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ExternalNodes):
>
> #!/bin/sh
> # Super-simple external_node script for versions 0.23 and later
> cat <<"END"
> ---
> classes:
> - basesystem
> parameters:
A couple of questions:
1) what does passwd look like before and after puppet
2) what does pam.conf look like before and after puppet?
(in the zone)
cheers,
/Martin
On Nov 17, 2:35 pm, Bruno B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not using LDAP or NIS. The users are managed with /etc/passwd
> file.
>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Crawford Kyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>> so I'm particularly interested to hear what the
>> major conceptual stumbling blocks were for getting started so that we
>> make sure we're smoothing that path out
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:27:24 +1300
Aj Aj wrote:
>
> You'll want to use the membership parameter to achieve this, check
> the type ref.
I've done. But I don't know how membership could help me
I've tried with both values: inclusive, minimum.
user { "arnaubria":
ensure => present,
Ceri Storey wrote:
> The problem therefore, is that currently, puppet can only say "Make X
> look like Y", not "While doing A make X look like Y and otherwise Z".
> So we could say something like:
>
> loadbalancer { $ipaddress: ensure => enabled }
> semaphore { $cluster_name: ensure => none }
>
Funny. Using the following script from the
wiki(http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ExternalNodes):
#!/bin/sh
# Super-simple external_node script for versions 0.23 and later
cat <<"END"
---
classes:
- basesystem
parameters:
puppet_server: puppet.example.com
dns_server: ns.example.co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ceri Storey wrote:
> For some background, we're essentially using puppet in much the same
> way you would use the ssh-and-a-for-loop method. I know it's well,
> fundamentally missing the point, but the thing is, there are a few
> constraints that we'r
Hi all.
For some background, we're essentially using puppet in much the same
way you would use the ssh-and-a-for-loop method. I know it's well,
fundamentally missing the point, but the thing is, there are a few
constraints that we're currently otherwise unable to satisfy.
Essentailly, we have a
Hello,
I'm hoping someone can help out. :)
Our rails deployment uses a custom compiled ruby. The app runs under a
certain named rails. So in trying to be able to manage it's gems, I
tried creating a custom provider. I took the default gem provider and
modified it like this:
commands :gemcmd
You'll want to use the membership parameter to achieve this, check the
type ref.
Regards,
Aj
On 18/11/2008, at 9:57 PM, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:24:27 -0600
> Luke Kanies wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
>>> Is delete / recreate the only solution?
>>
>> What do you
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:32:32 +0100
Thomas Bellman wrote:
>
> Arnau Bria wrote:
>
> > In the example I have notify and subscribe, but I've been playing
> > with only one, with only the other and both, and ALWAYS exec
> > "yaim_conf" is executed.
>
> You are missing the refreshonly parameter to
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:22:40 +0100
Peter Meier wrote:
>
> Hi
[...]
> it does. However exec execs every time puppet runs, unless you specify
> certain conditions. Like unless, onlyif or refreshonly.
Ok, I tried to define a unless condition, but I had no good ideas for
that (it's not as easy as r
Arnau Bria wrote:
> In the example I have notify and subscribe, but I've been playing with
> only one, with only the other and both, and ALWAYS exec "yaim_conf" is
> executed.
You are missing the refreshonly parameter to the exec type.
(Nice to see other LCG sites using Puppet, by the way. :-)
Hi
> [...]
> One or more objects that this object depends on. Changes in the subscribed to
> objects result in the dependent objects being refreshed (e.g., a service will
> get restarted). For instance:
> [...]
> Currently the exec, mount and service type support refreshing.
>
> SO exec should
Hi all,
Hi have something like:
file { "/opt/localconf/gLite3.1/yaim":
ensure => directory,
recurse => "true",
owner => "root",
group => "root",
mode=> "755",
source =>
"puppet://gri
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:24:27 -0600
Luke Kanies wrote:
Hi Luke,
> > Is delete / recreate the only solution?
>
> What do you mean?
# id arnaubria
uid=63003(arnaubria) gid=31401(grid) groups=31401(grid)
user { "arnaubria":
ensure=> present,
gid => "31401",
home
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben wrote:
> Has anyone attempted to get openvpn to work with puppets certificates?
>
You shouldn't have any issues. Puppet uses standard OpenSSL.
A recipe showing your configuration for the wiki would be great though.
*hint*.
Regards
James Turn
Has anyone attempted to get openvpn to work with puppets certificates?
I am thinking that it should work without to much fuss.
My current openvpn implementation uses the following certificates and
beside these are what i think would be the appropriate puppet ones.
openvpn server:
ca /etc/openv
28 matches
Mail list logo
