On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Greg Morgan wrote:
> I've searched for information on UML on the www.redhat.com site with
> google. I have not found much.
I wasn't aware there was ANY UML documentation on redhat's site. Look at
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
for more general information.
> Does
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Jay Turner wrote:
> ...
>
> UML allows you to setup a virtual machine, which you can then poke at and
> play with without risking your main setup. Think "linux within linux." If
> this is something you find interesting, then you can keep it installed on
> your machine. I t
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Greg Morgan wrote:
> ...
>
> I am looking for more on how Red Hat has designed their implementation
> of UML. One thing I find interesting is that they offer UML on just
> i686 class machines.
I don't think they have designed much, at least not publically anyway,
merely b
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Brian York wrote:
> What is the url that RHN tries to connect to
Look in /etc/sysconfig/rhn/up2date . If the reason you are asking is you
have deleted or otherwise misconfigured this file, mine is set to
https://xmlrpc.rhn.redhat.com/XMLRPC though I am running a beta OS at the
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Harold Helmich wrote:
> What are the issues with changing the channel the name in up2date from
> your current dist to the next? If I update all is that the same as
> installing new version? Can I selectively update packages this way?
> For example get the latest version o
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, M A Young wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Harold Helmich wrote:
>
> > What are the issues with changing the channel the name in up2date from
> > your current dist to the next? If I update all is that the same as
> > installing new version? Can I sel
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Colburn wrote:
> OK, RedHat will try to resolve the many flaws in RH8 with their new
> release, RH9 on April 7th.
>
> Any idea what they will charge retail for this?
Amazon will sell it to you for 31.49 GBP
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B8Y8KL
or 36.99 dollars
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Ross Macintyre wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a machine that has a corrup RPM database.
> I tried the usual
> rm var/lib/rpm/__db.00*, then
> rpm --rebuilddb
> which has worked in the past.
> This time nothing.
If rpm is getting stuck, rather than crashing, that often means some
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Tom Coady wrote:
> ...
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31] said: 550 5.0.0
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... You msut use a valid mail server
This may mean the last mail server your mail passes through before it
tries to get to a redhat server is unregist
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:05:22 +0100 (BST), M A Young wrote:
>
> > This may mean the last mail server your mail passes through before it
> > tries to get to a redhat server is unregistered, or is registered in
> > some way that upsets the redhat se
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:23:27 +0100 (BST)
> M A Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> #
> # I agree having seen that message that my suspicions were wrong, but
> # if I
> # understand your conclusion correctly; that dsl.pip
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Can anyone please sum up what the problem with dsl.pipex.com is
> compared with durham.ac.uk? Both don't resolve, but durham.ac.uk
> is accepted by mx1.redhat.com.
>
> The only difference I see is that dsl.pipex.com has a TTL of 10
> minutes.
I think it either has to be
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Mike Blatchley wrote:
> I was upgrading my IBM Thinkpad A21p system from 7.2
> to 8.0, and after I inserted disc3, the machine failed
> to mount it and refused to eject iteventually had
> to reboot machine.
The most obvious cause would be a bad CD image. Did you check you
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> Can the old Netscape Navigator RPMs from RH 7.3 be used in RH 8.0? The
> jag-offs at my bank still refuse to support Netscape 6/7/Mozilla for
> online banking.
I left it installed when I upgraded, and I don't remember any problems
on the handful of
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Balabhai Viktor Nikolaevich wrote:
> I have some troubles with installing RH8.0.
>
> My system:
> HP NetServer 4/33 LM, 486DX-33, 32MB RAM, EISA SCSI Adaptec AIC-7770
> (AHA2740),3COM Ethernet III (3c509).
>
> RH7.0 worked perfectly. But Install program of RH8.0 can not dete
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Samuel Flory wrote:
> M A Young wrote:
>
> >on drvblock.img, and see if that works. But even if it does, things may
> >get complicated later, because the minimum specification for 8.0 is 64MB
> >ram, and a pentium class processor. In particular
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Thomas Molina wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Ed Wilts wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you need to re-read the MINIMUM requirements:
> > http://www.redhat.com/software/linux/technical/
> > 128MB for graphics mode - 64MB for text.
>
> How is it I am able to install and run on a machine wi
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Thomas Molina wrote:
> > They don't say it won't work with so little memory, but presumably they
> > consider performance deterioration due to extra swapping to be
> > unacceptable, particularly with a minimum spec processor as well.
>
> Then it shouldn't be called a "require
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Jim Christiansen wrote:
> OK everyone,
>
> My @$%%# nicely running RH8 install will NOT work with geforce 4 mx440
> cards. My son's computer, a little old ecs k7sem rips along just fine when
> he sticks it in his.
>
> My motherboard is an Asus A7M266-D (duel)MP board.
>
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Declan McArdle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following on from the rpm thread of last month, I believe I have a
> corrupt RPM database.
>
> I've followed the instructions on http://www.rpm.org/hintskinks/repairdb
> but I get as far as the SEGV. (I'll log a bug with Bugzilla as per Jeff
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Jan Drewes wrote:
> ...
>
> the third problem is, that with kernel development (all subpackages) and
> development tools (all subpackages) installed, when I try to install the
> latest nvidia-drivers for my GF4TI4200, I get errors. I try to do
> "rpmbuild --rebuild NVIDIA_kern
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Raul Acevedo wrote:
> I'm having problems installing Oracle 8.1.7, using the same linux81701
> tar ball from Oracle's site I used to get it working on Red Hat 7.3.
>
> I unpack it, create the oracle user and dba/oinstall groups, but when I
> run the run the runInstaller script
On 8 Nov 2002, Brian K. Jones wrote:
> I'd be willing to come up with an FAQ based on some of my own
> experiences along with the contributions from others. I can post it
> here or on http://www.linuxlaboratory.org - I'm the webmaster there, and
> there's a section called 'Labs' where I put my no
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Brian K. Jones wrote:
> > > In /var/lib/rpm delete __db.00{1,2,3} and try again.
> >
> > I definitely nominate this for the FAQ.
>
> I think something like this belongs in the FAQ, but these kinds of answers
> piss me off, because they fail to explain *why* you need to d
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, antonio montagnani wrote:
> I have just tried to upgrade from 7.3 to 8.0 but the procedure stopped
> after checking dependencies and informed us that there was error (I
> apologize for not taking note of which error...) and that was aborted
> and that I could safely reboot
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, w wrote:
> I'm trying to rebuild mozilla-1.2 src.rpm with the --rebuild option. The
> rebuild fails, apparently due to a gcc problem:
>
> "checking whether the C compiler (gcc296 ) works... no
> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot
>
Alessandro Oliveira wrote:
> I've been away for about 2 months, and I'd like to know how it is going
> the development of the new redhat distros, have RH released any new
> public betas since psyche ?
There is now a stated release cycle of 6 months for 8.x at
http://www.redhat.com/software/whic
On 21 Dec 2002, Zaphod wrote:
> Pardon me for an incredibly stupid question, but where is the rawhide
> kernel? Is it a "kernel-source" RPM somewhere? I can't find it
> anywhere on Red Hat's ftp sites or mirrors. Specifically I want to play
> with the latest XFree86 stuff (Mike Harris are you o
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Riemer Palstra wrote:
> And the day after you write this, kernel-2.4.20-2.2 suddenly appears on
> all mirrors :)
>
> rsp., ... and what's that Phoebe thing?
It is probably about to be a new beta. The 8.1 beta is about due, it must
be about time for a beta for the next versi
Frank Jacobberger wrote:
>...
>>http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/testkernels/=20
>>for now.
>
>No you didn't. :(
Yes he did! The "equals 20" comes from a character encoding mismatch; try
http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/testkernels/
Michael Young
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL P
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:49:39PM -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > fsck will test your disk for bad blocks and allow you to map them out.
>
> Really? Which option in fsck? fsck is normally used to check and
> repair file systems, and this isn't a file syste
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Scott Taylor wrote:
> I thought I would try to perform an upgrade from the CD's, to see whether some
> errors I made might be overwritten and get fixed. (e.g. I downloaded the
> latest Mozilla which apparently does not work with Evolution, thinking that
> this would downgrad
Chris Kloiber wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 04:59, Neil Marjoram wrote:
> > I'm sorry I missed this problem, one day I will centralise my email!
> > Anyhow I have just installed Oracle 8.1.7 on RH 8.0 and it was a pain.
> > Can you retell your problem, may be I can help.
>
> Well Oracle 8.1.7 was
On 12 Nov 2002, Nadim Bitar wrote:
> I have a Dell Laptop Inspiron 8200, the CPU is supposed to be a mobile
> P4 1.8GHz but when I check /proc/cpuinfo the model name shown is
>
> Intel (R) Pentium (R) 4 Mobile CPU 1.60GHz
>
> Is this an error from the kernel? or did Dell ship me a laptop with t
Thom Paine wrote:
> Do you suppose that the purchase of an RHN subscription would get us
> access to redhat's rsync servers in addition to the instant ISO's? I was
> at around 450M of disc 1 and it died out and now I've lost the partial
> ISO. So I've hooked onto Duke to rsync them, that way I can
Brandon Hutchinson wrote:
> Does anyone want to post a URL for a blazing Red Hat 8.0 mirror? I see a
> good list at http://freshrpms.net/mirrors/psyche.html but of course most
> of those are getting beat on at the moment. Would anyone care to post
> any lesser-known fast mirrors?
You could try
http
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Margaret_Doll wrote:
> I just upgraded my systems to RedHat 8.0 including the kernel patch on
> their web page.
> The systems are at 2.4.18-17.8.0.
>
> I get the following error when I run PG 4.0 on my systems.
>
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot open
> /usr/lib/gcc
Tom Georgoulias wrote:
> Was /usr/sbin/rhn_register moved to a different package? It used to be
> part of a standalone rhn_register RPM...
No it was dropped altogether. I believe up2date automatically registers
now, but if you need to force it, use up2date --register .
Michael Young
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Chris Ricker wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Tom Georgoulias wrote:
> > When I ran up2date and gota error message about the channel my system
> > was subscribed to (it was still set to null), it specifically mentioned
> > running rhn_register to fix the problem. So that may be a
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Balandar Magister Officiarum wrote:
> I get the following error for the redhat 8.0 disk 3:
>
> /mnt/sysimage/var/tmp/nmh-1.0.4-15.i386.rpm cannot be opened due to missing
> file, bad package, or bad media.
>
> I have tried burning the ISO using different media and different
On 8 Oct 2002, John Weber wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 06:17, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Safer:
> >
> > $ md5sum /dev/cdrom
>
> Is this the supposed to be the same test as the mediacheck routine? I
> tried this on both an umounted and mounted disc #1 and in both cases it
> appears to read t
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Hesty P wrote:
> After installing RH 8.0, I ran chkrootkit and it
> reports that some LKM trojan might exist. Running:
> ./chkrootkit -x lkm
> reveals that there are 6 processes hidden from ps. Is
> this any cause for concern? I did run ethereal and
> cannot see anything out o
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BitBasher,
>
> In response to your mail of Monday, October 14, 2002 9:19:16 AM:
>
> B> If you want to check your RH 8.0 media, you can use ANY computer that
> B> supports bootable cdrom.
>
> No, this is the problem. I have checked the CD-ROM itself
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, bfd wrote:
> For those of you who get excited about these sort of things,
> there is a pocket-sized (32 MB) systems admin CD ISO for RH
> 8.0 at
>
> ftp://ftp.redhat.de/pub/rh-addons/rescue-cd/
Is this any different from the one that has been at beta/sysadm on the
ma
44 matches
Mail list logo
