Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:05:22 +0100 (BST), M A Young wrote:
>
> > This may mean the last mail server your mail passes through before it
> > tries to get to a redhat server is unregistered, or is registered in
> > some way that upsets the redhat server. It would be useful to see the
> > headers on the bounced message and especially the "Received:" ones.
>
> No, it's a get-host-by-name lookup as demonstrated in my message
> from "Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:06:46 +0200" (Message-Id:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ).
I agree having seen that message that my suspicions were wrong, but if I
understand your conclusion correctly; that dsl.pipex.com should have an A
record as well as an MX record, then I disagree, because it would mean
that I would be unable to post to this list, and clearly I can.
Michael Young
