On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:07:52PM +0100, Patrick wrote:
> I have not yet seen a 1.0.2 srpm on rawhide or somewhere else. Truetype
> Fonts and the menus in 1.0.2 look quite good although I don't know if
> that should be classified as "supporting anti-aliasing". Get the tarball
> and the specfile fr
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:41:08PM -0500, Peter Larsen wrote:
> Okay - this is a followup to an issue I posted a couple of weeks back,
> but nobody could/tried to answer.
>
> I cannot get gcc to work/compile at all:
>
> [plarsen@dilbert src]$ gcc hello.c
> In file included from /usr/local/include
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 05:18:37PM -0500, Eric Bourque wrote:
> After doing an "install everything" of RH 8.0, I noticed that some files
> I needed for i18n were not present, in particular /usr/lib/locale/fr_CA
> which I need for date formatting. On RH 7.3, I had this directory (and
> many others)
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:15:01AM -0500, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> I am trying to update to the glibc errata that was just released but
> I'm having a small dependency deadlock. The problem seems to be a lib
> that is in glibc-2.2.93 named libNoVersion.so.1, which is needed by
> Applix Anywhere
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:28:54AM -0500, John Ketchum wrote:
> I'm having a problem with gcc/glibc comaptibility on systems that I have
> upgraded to RH 8.0
>
> On systems that had the standard gcc that came with 7.3, when upgraded to
> 8.0, then I installed the new glibc-2.3.2 rpms, no problem
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:08:39PM -0500, John Ketchum wrote:
> On further investigation, it turns out that this problem is specific to C++
> programs. When compiling with gcc 3.2, the linker can't find libstdc++,
> or has unresolved symbols for some other reason, without explicitly
> referrin
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:08:56PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, John Ketchum wrote:
>
> > Perhaps I am missing a required library, or it is in a non-standard
> > location, but I don't know what library to look for. In this case, though,
> > it is the system compiler (gcc3.
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:00:16AM -0500, John Ketchum wrote:
> Thank you, Jakub. That was indeed the problem. The following command line
> does the trick:
> /usr/bin/gcc -o test test.c -Wl,-dynamic-linker,/lib/ld-linux.so.2,-rpath,/lib
-dynamic-linker,/lib/ld-linux.so.2 is the default, no poin
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:53:46AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> //Application Source
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# more hello.cpp
> #include
> #include
> #include
> using namespace std;
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> wstring x(L"Hello World!");
> //cout <
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:44:30AM -0400, Nick H Johnson wrote:
> Tim wrote:
> > The 'su' command is /bin/su. Perhaps /bin dropped out of your $PATH
> > for some reason?
>
> Nope, /bin is still in my $PATH however su isn't in /bin. odd.
> thanks Tim,
> any other ideas?
rpm -q sh-utils
rpm -V sh-
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:13:32PM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> Hi Ryan
>
> Thanks for your advice.
>
> At 12:44 PM 10/13/2002 -0400, Ryan Camick wrote:
> >Otherwise, look for the rpm's on your installation CD's and install these
> >three:
> >
> >openoffice-1.0.1-8
> >openoffice-libs-1.0.1-8
> >op
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:51:13PM -0400, Gerry Kirk wrote:
> OpenOffice provides a definition for a PDF printer. I'd like to use that
> definition for creating a global PDF printer or find some other way to
> do it.
>
> I tried using the print config tool that comes with RedHat, but it seems
> to
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:51:46AM -0500, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
>
> Thomas Dodd wrote:
> > But if most pre i686 CPUS (pre PPro/PII/Athlon) run the i386 code
> > mix faster than the pentium mix, why not supply the i386 mix.
> > I woul thing there are more 486s, P/MMX, K5, K6, and Cyrix CPUs
> > sti
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:31:05PM +0700, David Sudjiman wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I just move to GRUB and have a bit dificulties.
>
> I used to use append="console=ttyS0,9600" for my lilo for my serial.. how can
> I use it on GRUB?
title foobar
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-so
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Mario Torre wrote:
> Il gio, 2002-11-07 alle 08:06, Darrel ha scritto:
> > I have no idea what has changed in gcc 3.2 that is so different I can't compile
>anything.
> >
> > --
> > #include
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> > cout << "Hello Wor
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 07:07:22AM -0700, Frank Jacobberger wrote:
> I'm getting repeated failure during install of UT2003 on RH 8.
>
> Here is a snipet: of what is the general happening. Mind you
> the install begins normally and somewhere, anywhere, this will
> occur:
>
> Backtrace:
> [ 1] ./C
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:09:44PM -0600, Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
> Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 2:24:23 PM, Ronald wrote:
> > We're having a bit of trouble with the gcc 3.2 for RH 8.0, mostly
> > having to do with interaction with gdb.
>
> I've got a bit more information, now. We generated a small
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:32:23AM -0600, nahum castro wrote:
> OpenOffice has java disabled anyone know how to
> enable?
That's because OOo in the distro is built without Java SDK
installed (we don't ship Java SDK, thus requiring it would mean
the distro is not self hosting).
You'd have to hack
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 12:03:18PM -0800, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:32:23AM -0600, nahum castro wrote:
> >> OpenOffice has java disabled anyone know how to
> >> enable?
>
> > That's because OOo in the distro is built without Java SDK
> > installed (we don
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 09:36:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 560 > ooffice
> Checking for existing user installation ... ... NOT FOUND
> Performing first-time installation for user ... ... DONE
> Starting OpenOffice.org ...
> **
> nsN
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:33:49PM -0400, AnI AnI wrote:
> some packages from RHL 8.0 (such as irb) are not available in Bugzilla.
> Is it a bug or not ?
It is not. bugzilla components are the names of source packages, not
binary packages. And rpm -q irb --qf '%{SOURCERPM}\n'
prints ruby-*.src.r
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 04:09:02PM +0200, Alessandro Polverini wrote:
> Hello,
> following the release notes instructions I did the following command:
>
> prelink --verbose --all conserve-memory
>
> It seems like it does a lot of work but after some time I get the
> following error:
>
> [...
22 matches
Mail list logo
