IBM SCSI RAID sector errors

2003-07-22 Thread
Hi, I have the following: IBM eSeries x345 server 6 x 10K rpm Ultra 160 SCSI 36.4 GB drives (hotswappable) RAID 5 is installed with 5.10 ServeRAID version RedHat 8, with all of the latest RPM updates For some reason, after the server has been running for a period of time I get the following er

rpm upgrading

2003-07-22 Thread Matt D. Brei
I must be a bit confused on the upgrading of a package using rpm. I use rpm -Uhv but it still gives me package conflicts with * errors. Does the --replacepkgs option have to be used for this? Thanks, Matt -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/

Re: rpm upgrading

2003-07-22 Thread Tom Diehl
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Matt D. Brei wrote: > I must be a bit confused on the upgrading of a package using rpm. I use > rpm -Uhv but it still gives me package conflicts with * > errors. Does the --replacepkgs option have to be used for this? Most likely no. You will have to tell us a little more

RE: rpm upgrading

2003-07-22 Thread Matt D. Brei
I got it to work. I didn't use -Uhv. And no, I wasn't using wildcards, it was just an example (bad one at that). I was trying to update MySQL from 3.23 to 4. I installed the client tools first, then the shared, then tried the server package but got errors about perl-DBD being needed by MySQL-3.

Re: rpm upgrading

2003-07-22 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 22:02, Matt D. Brei wrote: > I got it to work. I didn't use -Uhv. And no, I wasn't using wildcards, > it was just an example (bad one at that). I was trying to update MySQL > from 3.23 to 4. I installed the client tools first, then the shared, > then tried the server pac

Re: IBM SCSI RAID sector errors

2003-07-22 Thread Anoop Chandran
hi, i have a 3 x 10k rpm Ultra 160 SCSI 36.4 GB on an ibm x220 No raid config and no hot swapping. .. i have a samba server configured on this machine, occassionally these kind of errors are reported,althhough i a haven't found any performance drop in the activity.. again i was unable to duplica