Hi all,
I'm using RedHat 8 for a few weeks and try to stop the need of Windows
products. But now I have a problem which isn't that funny.
Sometimes - I cannot reproduce the problem - my Alt Gr key doesn't work
the way it should. By pressing this key to write for example an [at] I
get some spec
Hi gurus,
I am installing the home machine as I told you in previous emails with the
following 3 OSes:
Windoze ME (FAT32)
Win XP (NTFS)
RH 8 (EXT3)
I have followed your advice and put the 2 windoze oses on the same hard disk
which is a primary master. First I installed ME on a FAT32 partition the
what's the problem with his php+apache2 ??
i'm with them (and squirrelmail) and works fine ...
the conectiva linux (www.conectiva.com.br) uses apache 1.3.x ...
try to looking for a src package of conectiva 8 (updates)
see ya!
Stephen Carville wrote:
I finally have to admit that PHP and Apache 2.x
Hi,
Just thought I should tell how to do it in case anyone else runs in to
this problem.
I've tried just about everything but nothing worked.
After using SuSE for a day I switched to using their choice of
dhcp-client "dhcpcd" and after modifying /etc/rc.d/init.d/network to run
"dhcpcd -k" at
On Monday 24 March 2003 04:55 am, Sergio Durand wrote:
> what's the problem with his php+apache2 ??
> i'm with them (and squirrelmail) and works fine ...
Several minor issues. Most recently problems with attachments not
uploading correctly from IE 6.
> the conectiva linux (www.conectiva.com.br)
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 00:47, Chris Andre wrote:
> I am in need of push in the right direction.
> I have created the following additions to my /etc/fstab file
>
> /dev/hda1 /mnt/winxp vfatnoauto,owner0 0
> /dev/hda5 /mnt/lindowsauto
guess you'll need more than 2 parts on your second drive
for your linux, I suggest at least 3 parts:
/
/home (min 200 Mo)
but I suggest adding 2 more parts:
/boot (50 - 80 Mo)
/var (for preventing system from increasing log files without beeing
rotated, and/or put you www or ftp server
Hi
What exactly is the problem?
The motherboard, audio and video chipsets have all changed significantly
since 6.2 came out.
I would suggest using some older hardware.
Guy
Freddy Jensen wrote:
We are having problems installing RH 6.2 on a new Dell PC.
It almost looks like the PC hardware is
Here is an /etc/fstab entry that allows access to a share at boot:
This is supposed to be on one line but will likly be wrapped.
//server/share /home/user/share smbfs
credentials=/home/user/.credentials 1 1
where :
/home/user/.credentials
contains :
---%<...snip...
username = shareuser
passwo
Hi
If the share is on a machine running samba make sure you are typing the
password created with
the smbpasswd utility. The smb password is not nessisarily the same as
the unix password.
Guy
Stephen Mah wrote:
when I type: smb://server/share, I'm prompted for a username &
password. However,
Hi
If you have ME and XP installed and not conflicting you are ready to go.
You can use the partition with ME installed on it for files available to
all configurations.
Both XP and RH 8 can read FAT32.
Don't partition the second drive before installing RH 8.
Install RH 8 with at the very least
> But when I try to configure the RH 8.0 hard drive on my desktop,
> using the Internet Configuration Wizard, I get to where ping 192.168.1.1
> works with 0% loss -- but trying to connect a browser to
> http://192.168.1.1 gets a message saying "The connection was refused
> when attempting to conta
I'm working in an environment where management is overly sensitive to
changes. We've been developing and QA'ing on a 8.0 install basically
straight out of the box. Our fielded systems will have a minimum install
with very few extras. Certainly SSH will need to be updated. Probably
several others.
I've tried several times to get on the netfilter mailing list, but the
confirmation never works. Is that mailing list still active?
Is this or another place the best place for iptables questions?
Thanks,
Allan
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailma
On Monday 24 March 2003 10:45, Allan M. Stewart wrote:
> Is there an easy way to check only for security updates? It would be
> very time consuming to do searches on every installed RPM.
rhn.redhat.com has an interface to the applicable errata that you can sort by
security.
--
Jesse Keating RHC
Is this spam using redhat's name ? I have not heard of redhat 9 yet ?
Dear Colleague:
You may know that Red Hat Network is the best way to keep your
systems running the latest errata and always up to date. What you
might not know is that Red Hat Network passed the one million users
mark earlier t
Hi,
> Is this spam using redhat's name ? I have not heard of redhat 9 yet ?
I just recieved one myself, different wording. It appears to be
legitimate. The wording could be whether one is already a subscriber
to RHN or not. However RH 9 does sound fishy as isn't the next release
just a point r
Hi again,
I just verified it. This is legitimate, so apparently there is no 8.1,
but a 9 instead. Go to http://www.redhat.com, and in the lower right
corner in the Community box there is the same thing and a link to
click to get RedHat 9 early.
Regards,
Eric Burke
--
Psyche-list mailing
You caught me forwarding this mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marek wrote:
Is this spam using redhat's name ? I have not heard of redhat 9 yet ?
Dear Colleague:
You may know that Red Hat Network is the best way to keep your
systems running the latest errata and always up to date. What you
might not k
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:53:55 -0800, Eric Burke wrote
> Hi again,
>
> I just verified it. This is legitimate, so apparently there is no
> 8.1, but a 9 instead. Go to http://www.redhat.com, and in the lower
> right corner in the Community box there is the same thing and a link
> to click to get R
I think they want to match Mandrake's version number...
Just a thought...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric
Burke
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spam ?
Hi again,
I just verified
That's pretty impressive what would make them skip a dot release?
Will Mendez
Toaster[2]
Mmmm...XSI
www.xsibase.com
www.xsimontreal.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mike Vanecek
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
> I think they want to match Mandrake's version number...
> Just a thought...
>
I never even thought about that. The only thing there is...Mandrake is
releasing 9.1but this would at least catch them up.
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/list
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:45:35PM -0500, Allan M. Stewart wrote:
>
> I'm working in an environment where management is overly sensitive to
> changes. We've been developing and QA'ing on a 8.0 install basically
> straight out of the box. Our fielded systems will have a minimum install
> with very
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:39:27PM +0200, Marek wrote:
> Is this spam using redhat's name ? I have not heard of redhat 9 yet ?
Just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Red
Hat never pre-announces version numbers and everybody that assumed the
next version was going to b
There is also no feature list, at least I can't find one.
Will Mendez
Toaster[2]
Mmmm...XSI
www.xsibase.com
www.xsimontreal.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Eric Burke
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
Well, I do know that it's incredibly arrogant and misleading to jump from
v8.0 to v9.0 without any intermediate steps. NOBODY in the software world
does that without some serious serious feature additions. RH9 will be
nothing more than some normal updates. Xfree 4.3, a (still broken) Apache
2.0/PHP
> Marek, would you please check the headers. Did this come from Red Hat
> or from CheetaMail? If from Red Hat, why would Red Hat be using an
> outfit with a reputation for being a spamhaus? If not, it's spam.
>
>
>
I know I am not Marek...just wanted to point out the one I recieved
was from Re
I have just installed Mozilla 1.3 with GTK2 support.
My mozilla doesn't recognize Realplayer plugin (i.e. the file rpnp.so
file that is /usr/lib/Mozilla-1.3/plugins) even if I use the About
plugins: button.
And the plugin was working in 1.3b before upgrading. Shall I blame
myself for upgrading t
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> Well, I do know that it's incredibly arrogant and misleading to jump from
> v8.0 to v9.0 without any intermediate steps. NOBODY in the software world
> does that without some serious serious feature additions. RH9 will be
> nothing m
> Well, I do know that it's incredibly arrogant and misleading to jump
from
> v8.0 to v9.0 without any intermediate steps. NOBODY in the software
world
> does that without some serious serious feature additions. RH9 will be
> nothing more than some normal updates. Xfree 4.3, a (still broken)
Apa
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:39:27PM +0200, Marek wrote:
> Is this spam using redhat's name ? I have not heard of redhat 9 yet ?
A little bit of network detective work is in order...
>
> Dear Colleague:
>
> You may know that Red Hat Network is the best way to keep your
> systems running the lates
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Eric Burke wrote:
> > I think they want to match Mandrake's version number...
> > Just a thought...
> >
>
> I never even thought about that. The only thing there is...Mandrake is
> releasing 9.1but this would at least catch them up.
>
>
>
>
More like slackware 9.0 which w
Charles Curley wrote:
Marek, would you please check the headers. Did this come from Red Hat
or from CheetaMail? If from Red Hat, why would Red Hat be using an
outfit with a reputation for being a spamhaus? If not, it's spam.
from mta101.cheetahmail.com (mta101.cheetahmail.com [216.15.189.35])
--
I also received a message from "Red Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]" which
was just an add to become a Red Hat Network subscriber. But I did
receive a letter from "Red Hat Network [EMAIL PROTECTED]" It
describes a new service to RHN subscribers which will allow them to
download the newest ISO before they are
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 15:44, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> Well, I do know that it's incredibly arrogant and misleading to jump from
> v8.0 to v9.0 without any intermediate steps. NOBODY in the software world
> does that without some serious serious feature additions. RH9 will be
> nothing more than som
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:39:27PM +0200, Marek wrote:
> Is this spam using redhat's name ? I have not heard of redhat 9 yet ?
>
> Dear Colleague:
>
> You may know that Red Hat Network is the best way to keep your
> systems running the latest errata and always up to date. What you
> might not kno
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:37:03AM -0800, David Boyes wrote:
> I have the 3 CD image install disk for Redhat 8.0. I believe called ISO.
>
> All three check out on the test before install.
>
> I am installing on a 3.2gb drive that is formatted FAT32.
David - Note that a full install of RH 8 will
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:41:56PM -0600, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Sorry, do not mean to be thick, but the man iptables says,
>
>-L, --list
> List all rules in the selected chain. If no chain is selected,
> all chains are listed. It is legal to specify the
Viestissä Maanantai 24. Maaliskuuta 2003 22:44, Daevid Vincent kirjoitti:
> Well, I do know that it's incredibly arrogant and misleading to jump from
> v8.0 to v9.0 without any intermediate steps. NOBODY in the software world
> does that without some serious serious feature additions. RH9 will be
>
Hello psyche-list,
The Debian distro appears to have a modified version of the "Crack"
password testing utility that is set up for the MD5 passwords that are
recommended these days.
The Debian distribution uses a system with which I am not familiar,
and have been unable to decipher sufficiently t
Guy Fraser wrote:
Hi
If the share is on a machine running samba make sure you are typing
the password created with
the smbpasswd utility. The smb password is not nessisarily the same as
the unix password.
Guy
Stephen Mah wrote:
when I type: smb://server/share, I'm prompted for a username &
I'm no expert in the area, however, my understanding of upgrades is that the
general convention for at hop from on number to another would be a 'major'
change in a kernal/a new look/ or something that separates it from the
previous number/numners. If the hop is several numbers, then this would
indi
> Check the man pages for mount and fstab. You're looking for the
> "users" option.
>
Thanks Joe,
I will read up tonight after work..
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
I'll bet that was to undercut SuSE :)
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Daevid Vincent wrote:
Well, I do know that it's incredibly arrogant and misleading to jump from
v8.0 to v9.0 without any intermediate steps. NOBODY in the software world
does that without some serious serious feature additions. RH9 will be
nothing more than some normal updates. Xfree 4.3, a (still
HI All,
I've got a firewire disk on my RedHat 8.0 computer. If it's all plugged
together and turned on when I boot the computer, the disk comes up
and mounts just fine.
But what do we have to do make the device hot-pluggable? I don't
understand if it is kudzu's job or /sbin/plugin that is suppo
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 14:50, Jack Bowling wrote:
> I'm an RHN subscriber and I got it, too. If it is spam, it is extermely
> well done :-)) BTW, market pressure is likely the reason to jump to 9.x
> series. Mandrake is there already.
It's definitely a marketing thing. Not only Mdk but Sl
Randall J. Parr wrote:
Daevid Vincent wrote:
Well, I do know that it's incredibly arrogant and misleading to jump from
v8.0 to v9.0 without any intermediate steps. NOBODY in the software world
does that without some serious serious feature additions. RH9 will be
nothing more than some normal updat
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:40:16PM -0800, Randall J. Parr wrote:
> I DO care that this jump does not SEEM to be related to major
> kernel/lib/feature changes which triggered a major version number BUT
> does cause a very rapid accelation in the decay of version support and
> certification expira
Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:40:16PM -0800, Randall J. Parr wrote:
I DO care that this jump does not SEEM to be related to major
kernel/lib/feature changes which triggered a major version number BUT
does cause a very rapid accelation in the decay of version support and
c
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:21:53 -0800, Jack Bowling wrote
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:41:56PM -0600, Mike Vanecek wrote:
>
> > Sorry, do not mean to be thick, but the man iptables says,
> >
> >-L, --list
> > List all rules in the selected chain. If no chain is selected,
> >
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:21:00 -0600, Ed Wilts wrote
[snip]
> Please note that 8.0 will be unsupported after December 31 of this year.
> You should start planning a version 9 rollout soon (it will be publicly
> available in early April). Personally, I'm going to be migrating my
> production system
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 14:44, Marie-Thérèse Lorentzen wrote:
> I'm no expert in the area, however, my understanding of upgrades is that the
> general convention for at hop from on number to another would be a 'major'
> change in a kernal/a new look/ or something that separates it from the
> previous
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 07:09:03PM -0600, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Can you please point me to where it says RH 8.0 supports goes at the
> end of year?
http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:16:18PM -0800, Tom Ball wrote:
> As someone else commented, a release number is just that, a number
> created by marketing. Often they choose numbers based on the reasoning
This is not true, minor releases maintain binary compatibility, unless
somebody wants to contrad
What do you make of this?
http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/
Is this basically rh 8.1?
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Stephen Mah wrote:
What do you make of this?
http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/
Is this basically rh 8.1?
See the phoebe, and redhat lists
--
There is no such thing as obsolete hardware.
Merely hardware that other people don't want.
(The Second Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory <[EMAI
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 12:13, Stephen Mah wrote:
> What do you make of this?
>
> http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/
>
> Is this basically rh 8.1?
Yes, the latest beta of Red Hat Linux, 8.0.94 (code name Phoebe) will be
Red Hat Linux 9 when it is released, rather than Red Hat Linux 8.1 as
many fir
Generally Red Hat update full numbers when binary compatibility breaks
the new glibc and threads have broken alot of stuff hence i believe that
they have done the correct thing by jumping numbers.
Dennis
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 08:44, Marie-Thérèse Lorentzen wrote:
> I'm no expert in the area, h
I have been looking at getting an external USB drive for backing up
files on my home network and I see the Maxtor 3000LE (120 GB) is
selling for around $200 FRN's. I know the Linux kernel supports USB
but how well does it work? I've read some horror stories about
poorly designed devices that
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 06:55:26PM -0500, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 14:50, Jack Bowling wrote:
>
> > I'm an RHN subscriber and I got it, too. If it is spam, it is extermely
> > well done :-)) BTW, market pressure is likely the reason to jump to 9.x
> > series. Mandrake is there al
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:56:17 -0800, you wrote:
>Yes, I was aware of that BUT please understand, the change to rapid
>expiration of specific versions means we have to update more often to be
>able to stay abreast of the flood of security updates AND new updates to
Not if you move to the Enterpr
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:44:06 -0800, you wrote:
>Well, I do know that it's incredibly arrogant and misleading to jump from
>v8.0 to v9.0 without any intermediate steps. NOBODY in the software world
>does that without some serious serious feature additions. RH9 will be
>nothing more than some normal
Hello
I have the exact same problem after installing Mozilla-1.3-0_rh8_gtk2.
Another problem I started seeing after upgrading Mozilla is
mplayer-plugin leaves the video on top even after the video ends or is
closed, only way is to close all open Mozilla windows.
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 16:36, Ant
Y Makki wrote:
Hello
I have the exact same problem after installing Mozilla-1.3-0_rh8_gtk2.
Another problem I started seeing after upgrading Mozilla is
mplayer-plugin leaves the video on top even after the video ends or is
closed, only way is to close all open Mozilla windows.
On Mon, 2003-03-2
Will Mendez wrote:
>
> That's pretty impressive what would make them skip a dot release?
The cynical me says it's to force RHCE recertification.
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
** Reply to message from Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 24 Mar 2003
20:23:38 -0800
> I have been looking at getting an external USB drive for backing up
> files on my home network and I see the Maxtor 3000LE (120 GB) is
> selling for around $200 FRN's. I know the Linux kernel sup
68 matches
Mail list logo
